image description
An image from the town's Geographic Information System map shows the lot owned by the town's Affordable Housing Trust (outlined in yellow) where Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity hopes to build five homes.
image description
A preliminary site plan that Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity shared with attendees at Wednesday's forum.

Williamstown Residents Concerned over Impact of Habitat Development

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Homeowners Kayla and Derek Falkowski ask questions at a Habitat information session at the Harper Center.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Drainage was the chief concern of the residents who turned out for Wednesday's informational meeting about a planned five-home development off Summer Street.
 
Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity President Keith Davis led an hourlong meeting at the Harper Center, the first of two such Wednesday evening sessions before the non-profit gives a preliminary presentation to the Planning Board scheduled for April 9.
 
The Planning Board later this spring will be asked to approve a subdivision to allow the parcel, currently owned by the town's Affordable Housing Trust, to be broken up into five building lots of about a quarter-acre apiece with a short road off Summer Street to serve them.
 
On Wednesday, Davis deferred until April 9 specific answers about how the planned project will manage stormwater — one of the elements subject to review by the Planning Board. He told the audience of about 10 residents that Northern Berkshire Habitat's civil engineer, Charlie LaBatt of Guntlow and Associates, will have details at the April 9 session at town hall.
 
The group had some other questions for Davis, such as how long the project will take (about five years, one per house, once the road is installed), when construction will take place (volunteer builders will be on site from 8 a.m. to noon, Wednesday, Friday and Saturday) and whether street lights are planned (they're not).
 
And at least resident, Kayla Falkowski, who owns a home at the intersection of Summer Street and North Hoosac, expressed concern that their corner lot will be turned into a peninsula with roads on three sides.
 
But the main worry was water.
 
"Once you clear that [land], it's going to be a running river through my yard," said Falkowski, whose home also is downhill from the development.
 
Davis sought to assure the neighbors that the project will be engineered such that the increased impervious surface from the road and homes will not increase overland flow of water. At one point, he said that the stormwater features of the project could alleviate existing runoff from the site.
 
"The idea is to detain the water," Davis said, indicating a rain garden on the northwest corner of the site, near Summer Street. "Some of the water will go into the storm system and out to the Hoosic River. Some will be recharged into the ground. None will be on the surface.
 
Several times during the meeting, Davis told the audience, "We have to handle the water," but he explained that he is not the project's engineer and asked the residents to have patience and wait for the full presentation from LaBatt in two weeks.
 
Davis did mention at one point that the project could be cut back to four homes if the final stormwater plan calls for another detention site that would take away a building lot.
 
Residents at the information session also asked whether and how the new five-home development would be screened from existing residences.
 
"It's just OK to clear cut everything and do no landscaping?" Falkowski asked at one point. "That doesn't seem environmentally friendly."
 
Henry Sayers, who accompanied Falkowski and her husband, Derek, to the session, told Davis that the Habitat for Humanity should be a "good neighbor" and plant screening to mitigate the impact on surrounding homes.
 
Davis told the audience that screening is not a requirement of the town's subdivision bylaw, and, while the non-profit is not against the concept of screening, it likely would not be in the budget.
 
At one point, Davis suggested that Sayers could donate to Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity to make the screening possible.
 
Davis spent some time explaining both the town's need for affordable housing and the Habitat for Humanity model for creating homes, as it recently did at the corner of Cole Avenue and Maple Street on another lot donated by the town's Affordable Housing Trust.
 
To explain the town's need, Davis referred residents to the Planning Board's recently completed comprehensive plan and its existing conditions report, which found, among other things, that 27 percent of the town's households are "cost burdened," when it comes to housing, meaning that they spend more than 30 percent of their annual income on housing costs.
 
The report itself advocates for infill development, the type of development on underutilized parcels that NBHFH hopes to achieve.
 
The non-profit Davis leads, a chapter of the national Habitat for Humanity International, builds homes at a loss, relying on volunteer labor to do most of the work, including the initial owners of the homes, who are required to provide 250 hours of "sweat equity" before moving in.
 
Northern Berkshire Habitat relies on donations to make ends meet, Davis said. The last home it built, on Maple Street, lost the agency $70,000 — by design.
 
"A regular developer will build a home for $200,000 and sell it to you for $400,000," Davis said. "We build a home for $200,000 and sell it to you for $130,000.
 
"Would you sell your home to me for $130,000?" he asked rhetorically.
 
"I might have to if my basement is filled with water," answered Falkowski, drawing chuckles from the residents in attendance.
 
The next Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity information session is Wednesday, April 3, at the Harper Center at 7 p.m.

Tags: affordable housing,   habitat for humanity,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories