image description
The Williamstown Fire District's property at 562 Main St. (Route 2).

Williamstown Fire District Discusses Raising Permit Fees

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Williamstown Fire District is looking at how it can adjust its inspection fees to reflect their value and bring them in line with the prices in neighboring communities.
 
Chief Craig Pedercini on Wednesday showed the Prudential Committee a table with data he collected from 10 Berkshire County municipalities, most of which currently charge more than Williamstown for similar services.
 
For instance, the district currently charges $25 for a smoke alarm and carbon monoxide detector inspection for a single-family home at the time of sale. Of the nine communities responding to Pedercini's inquiry, only two (Lenox and Lee) charge so little. Pittsfield charges $35; the rest are between $40 and $60.
 
Pedercini proposed to the committee that it raise Williamstown's charge to $50 for that service, with $15 for additional units on a property.
 
That change actually would lower the fee currently charged for three- and four-unit residences. Currently, "triplexes" and quads are charged $100 for an inspection; under Pedercini's proposal, they would pay $80 and $95, respectively.
 
Most of Williamstown's inspection fees currently are $25. Only duplexes ($50) and multi-family residences ($100) pay more for the service.
 
Pedercini's proposal would raise all the current $25 charges to $50 and start charging $50 for some inspections that currently have no charge in the town: liquor licenses, alarm system inspections and annual inspections.
 
Again, in those cases, a fee would make Williamstown more like the majority of the communities in the survey sample, which charge anywhere from $35 to $60 for the inspections.
 
"I just think it's time we changed it a little bit," Pedercini told the committee. "Originally, when I asked for $25 it was to reimburse for gas for our vehicle."
 
"It's time-consuming," Prudential Committee member John Notsley agreed. "No ifs, ands or buts.
 
"Let's face it, these are archaic rates and have to be brought up. And it's for [the building owner's] safety."
 
Prudential Committee Chair David Moresi asked Pedercini to do a condensed version of the table he showed the committee that the district can post with a future meeting notice, allowing the public to weigh in before the panel votes on the new pricing schedule.
 
In other business on Wednesday afternoon, the committee voted 5-0 to accept a bid from WM. J Keller & Sons Construction of Castleton, N.Y., to do the early site work required at the Main Street parcel where the district plans to build a new fire station.
 
The bid came in at just less than $698,000.
 
That figure was in line with the $680,000 estimate the district had from the designer of the site work, Guntlow and Associates, according to district consultant Bruce Decoteau.
 
Prudential Committee members expressed their appreciation that Northern Construction quickly moved its material out of the area where the site work for the new station is planned. The district has been renting space on the former Lehovec property to Northern as a laydown area for the nearby Route 2 (Main Street) bridge replacement project.
 
Decoteau told the committee that Keller likely would be on site by late August doing the work to "charge" the site to prepare it for the construction to begin some time next year.
 
Moresi noted that subsequent work on the building site will fall under the responsibility of the general contractor, which the district has not put to bid. The goal of the site work is to let the ground settle while the building plans are finalized and a GC is hired so that the property will be construction ready when those milestones are reached.
 
Decoteau told the committee that the district's architects at EDM of Pittsfield have released the 50 percent design development documents and that the process for designing the new station remains on track.

Tags: fees,   fire station,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories