September has been a story of higher-bond yields, a stronger dollar, and spiking oil prices. The higher these assets climbed, the lower the stock market fell. And now we enter October, a month that is notorious for providing negative returns at least in the first weeks of the month.

 

"Tread cautiously" was how I described September-October several weeks ago. History indicates that those are the two worst months for stocks. So far that advice has proven accurate. The stock market has had its worst decline all year and the prospects that this sell-off will continue are high despite the dead cat bounce we are enjoying right now.

 

While yields, the dollar, and oil are separate asset classes, they are interrelated when it comes to explaining the "why" of this present downturn. Let's start with the price of oil. As I explained last week, since oil is used worldwide in practically everything it is an important element in gauging future inflation.

 

 Oil is now trading above $90 a barrel and some expect it to hit $100 a barrel shortly. The spike in energy prices therefore has convinced many traders that the decline in inflation we have enjoyed may reverse and as it does bond yields need to rise to compensate for the real rate of return bond holders should demand.

 

In addition, readers may recall my warning that the U.S. Treasury needs to replenish the government's general account by auctioning more than a trillion dollars in various bonds. In anticipation of that auction program, bond traders had already pressured yields higher.

 

By the way, that avalanche of government bond issuance will begin in earnest during this quarter, so yields could continue to move higher. As it is, the U.S. 10-year Treasury is yielding 4.60 percent, its highest level since 2007 while mortgage rates have hit a 23-year high.

 

The U.S. dollar has strengthened to 10-month highs as yields have risen. Currency traders still expect that the U.S. economy will remain more resilient to higher interest rates than other economies. The combination of all three elements has conspired to pressure stocks downward.

 

By mid-week the markets were exhibiting extreme oversold readings. Sentiment as measured by the AAII Sentiment Survey gave the highest bearish reading and the lowest bullish score since May 2023. The "Fear" Index, according to CNN, was showing extreme fear.

 

These are all short-term contrarian indications that tell traders to expect a countertrend bounce. Yields fell slightly and the dollar followed suit which gave equities some breathing room to rally. Stocks could continue higher for a day or two, especially on the back of the latest Personal Consumption Expenditures Index (PCE), which is the Fed's preferred inflation measure. The PCE came in cooler than expected. The Algo traders took that to mean inflation was not as strong as the markets expect and pushed stocks higher.

 

I still think the markets have more to fall before this sell-off is said and done. The 200-Day Moving Average for the S&P 500 Index is about 125 points below at 4,200. However, stocks do not usually bounce off that line perfectly. Many times, the averages will overshoot to the downside, so that we could see 4,100 or maybe lower before we regain the 200 DMA.

 

It is a process that I am expecting to play out between now and the second week of October before we begin to rise once again. But to do so, we would need to see yields drop as well as the dollar. If things do develop the way I see it, I would be a big buyer of that pullback, but probably not in the same sectors that had been winners in the first half of the year. A declining dollar and lower yields would be beneficial to overseas markets, especially emerging market countries, as well as mines and metals, precious metals, and other sectors that have an inverse relationship with the dollar.  

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

On Saturday, Sept. 30, 2023, $24 billion in emergency funding for the nation's child day-care industry expires. Estimates are that as many as 70,000 care centers or more will close over the next year, impacting as many as 3.2 million kids. The downside for working women with young children could be even more substantial.

 

In recent columns, I have written of the gains women have made in the post-pandemic labor force. Women's workforce participation, especially women with children under 5, is higher than it has ever been (at 70.4 percent, compared to a pre-pandemic high of 68.9 percent). That brings the employment gap between men and women to record lows.

 

This progress was made possible in part by the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan of 2021. During the pandemic and its aftermath, the federal government, under the Biden administration, a congressional bipartisan bill passed one of the largest economic rescue plans in U.S. history. The legislation earmarked $24 billion in spending to bail out the faltering day-care industry. It gave wage increases to woo workers back into the sector, helped to offset rising costs, and made several more improvements to help an area reeling from the impact of COVID-19. The result was to give mothers the ability and freedom to rejoin the workforce. They did so in droves.

 

Those gains will now be threatened. The care centers that remain open will need to reduce staffing and operating hours, while raising tuition and fees. This will take time to unfold, but probably over the next six to 12 months the results of this change will be in full force.

 

A Hail Mary hope within the day-care industry is that the states might come to their rescue. The disruption could cost states $10.6 billion in tax and business revenue annually and reduce family earnings by as much as $9 billion, according to the Century Foundation.

 

This crisis is going to force parents (especially women) into working fewer hours or leaving the workforce altogether. For many others, it may mean switching to less demanding roles with obvious consequences for career advancement.

 

It will also resurrect a litany of economic inequalities that have plagued American women for decades. If they become part-time workers, they will lose employer medical benefits. And if they must once again leave the workforce it will reduce their Social Security benefits at retirement.

 

A viable child-care system is considered a public good by most Americans. Studies indicate that children who receive high-quality care become better educated and ultimately receive better-paying jobs. Unfortunately, in this country, the myth that the private sector can do a better job at this than the government has proven not to be the case.

 

Providers operate on slim margins, pay workers a lot less than most fast-food chains, and experience high turnover. Low-wage workers have plenty of other choices in this tight labor economy, which leaves care centers in many areas of the country unable to provide the services needed. 

 

Today the industry is short 40,000 positions from early 2020 levels. The end of government funding could mean as many as an additional 232,000 jobs could be lost. Day-care waiting lists are years long. And that is if you are lucky enough to live in an area that still provides child care. Even with the government funding, child-care costs have skyrocketed in this inflationary environment. Families, especially in lower-income jobs, can't pay the freight any longer. 

 

It all creates a combination that turns out to be a disaster when it comes to child development. "Child care is a textbook example of a broken market," said Janet Yellen, the U.S. Treasury secretary, back in 2021.

 

As I write this, the new battle cry of partisan politics in Washington revolves around cutting government spending. We suffered through the debt ceiling debacle because of it and now a potential government shutdown is in the making. The government appears ready to abdicate its responsibility to ensure the continued existence of child care. We will all suffer, but women most of all.

 

As the Sept. 30 expiration approaches, couples and single parents will be faced with some hard choices. Pay for the coming higher costs and reduced services of a dwindling number of child-care providers or figure another way to keep working and take care of the kids at the same time. Let's hope there are still a lot of grandparents available to fill the child-care gap.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

The financial markets were expecting a lot of good news out of the Federal Open Market Committee meeting this week. Investors were betting that not only would the Fed pause, but possibly announce an end of interest rate hikes altogether. Some even expected a timetable for future rate cuts that would be sooner than later.

 

The market was right on the pause in interest rate hikes. The U.S. central bank decided not to hike the Fed funds rate but that was about the extent of the good news. In his Q&A session after the meeting, Chair Jerome Powell reiterated his message that further rate hikes were still on the table, but they would proceed "carefully." They have already raised rates 12 times over 17 months. He also left the audience with an expectation that there would be at least one more interest rate hike, if not two, this year.

 

In addition, the dot plot chart, which represents Fed members' expectations for future changes in interest rates indicated that most members had backed off from a prospective four cuts next year to only two, maybe. Most thought an interest cut would not occur until sometime in the latter part of 2024 — if then. Part of the problem, Powell said, was the continuing strength in the U.S. economy, which is performing far better than fed officials expected.

 

When everyone is on one side of the boat (as they were before the meeting), the risk is that a disappointment could capsize the boat. That was what exactly happened as Powell came out much more hawkish than anyone expected. Traders pulled the plug on bullish trades driving the main averages down by more than 1 percent and followed through on Thursday with similar losses.

 

In the bond market, the thinking was just as dire. If interest rates were going to stay higher for longer than yields needed to adjust to reflect that new reality. 

 

Traders sold bonds across the board sending yields to 15-year highs. The yield on the 10-year, U.S. Treasury bond spiked to 4.6 percent, which sent the dollar higher and equities lower.

 

Technology was the hardest hit, but few sectors escaped the selling. Sectors that have an inverse correlation with the dollar, such as precious metals, and materials. etc., were dumped and speculative stocks took it on the chin.  Energy was one of the few bright spots with oil prices holding up in the $90/bb. range. However, higher oil prices only complicate the Fed's work. As I wrote last week, higher energy prices fuel higher inflation and the longer it stays at this level, the harder the Fed's job becomes in reducing inflation.

 

Several negative short-term events are adding to the pessimistic attitude of investors. The UAW strike, which threatens to expand, could dent economic growth. The looming government shutdown, caused by the chaotic atmosphere within the Republican party, does not inspire buyers either. The sharp climb in bond yields has also tempted more investors to seek safety.

 

The Fed's hawkish stance ruined my hopes for a bounce this week, and we are still in a weak seasonal period. I warned readers this is historically a negative time for the markets. I had expected that the SP 500 Index would at least re-test the August lows and that did occur this week (the intra-day low for that index was 4,335). Right now, the S&P 500 Index is oversold, more so than at any other time this year.

 

A relief rally on Friday was to be expected. It seemed anemic to me but could continue into next week. I advise readers to remain cautious for now and most likely into mid-October. There could be further downside, especially if we see yields and the dollar move higher.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

Over the last month, pot stocks have spiked higher. Some have doubled in price. The news that the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency may reclassify marijuana from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act to Schedule III has given new hope to this beleaguered industry and investors.

 

The effort to reclassify started 10 months ago when the Biden administration directed the Department of Health and Human Services to review the scheduling of cannabis under federal law. As a result of that review, HHS sent a letter to the DEA recommending a proposed schedule change.

 

Currently, marijuana is listed as a Schedule I drug with no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse similar to heroin or LSD. If the DEA were to reduce cannabis to a Schedule III drug, it would have the same profile as drugs such as Tylenol with codeine, anabolic steroids, or ketamine. That could be good news for pot companies selling medical marijuana. However, the new classification would only be available by prescription, and still be regulated by the federal government including possibly the FDA. And while medical marijuana might become broadly legal, most states would need to overhaul their legal and tax systems to align with the federal Schedule III restrictions.

 

It would not make marijuana legal. In addition, rescheduling the drug would do nothing to close the policy gap between state and federal cannabis laws. The reclassification is also completely different from the SAFE Banking Act, which would allow banks to provide financial services to the industry. That is still held up in Congress. Given the facts, why therefore would the stocks of some marijuana companies double in price in less than a month? The simple answer is taxes.

 

As a Schedule I substance, marijuana and the companies that produce and sell it are prohibited (by IRC Section 280E) from claiming deductions and credits for trade or business expenses that other legal businesses can claim. A rescheduling to Schedule III would be a large, and for some companies, a huge boost to their bottom lines. Expenses like rent, payroll, interest, depreciation, advertising, and so much more would be allowed to be deducted from taxes. For normal companies, these are all standard tax deductions.

 

Depending on the company, some players in the industry could see a 20-30 percent boost in their bottom-line after-tax profits, which explains why so many pot stocks have moved up in price. However, Canadian companies are not affected by these U.S. tax benefits. A potential buyer should understand that if interested in this sector.

 

Rescheduling would also allow cannabis companies to advertise in newspapers, magazines, and other media without worrying about crossing state lines. It would allow mailing advertisements as well. Research on the impact of marijuana and its many forms becomes easier and more widespread as well without the restrictions associated with a Schedule I drug.

 

On the state level, 20 states have already approved laws that exempt, or at least decouple, businesses from Section 280E of the federal tax code. These state exemptions have already saved millions for some large operators in state taxes. However, as it stands, the state-level exemptions do not affect the federal taxes owed by marijuana companies, and businesses are still not allowed to deduct these expenses toward their federal income taxes. 

 

For many states that still follow federal guidelines and therefore enforce Section 280E, a change of the federal level in scheduling would result in a cascade of changes at the state level, at least for the medical marijuana business. It is not known how, or if, a rescheduling will impact recreational marijuana use.  

 

A Schedule III designation does not need to go through Congress to become law. That is a good thing, but reclassifying marijuana would not broadly legalize, or even decriminalize the drug. The next obvious step toward those goals would be the passage of the SAFE Banking Act, which was introduced in 2017 and passed the House seven times with bipartisan support since 2019.

 

The Senate has been the holdup, but that may be changing. The Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee is expected to hold a markup session for the bill sometime next week. This markup process is a key step in advancing the bill. It allows senators to debate and consider amendments to the bill. Scuttlebutt says both sides of the aisle on the committee support the bill and, if so, that would give the Senate at large a sign that progress toward passage is in the works.

 

One caveat to these positive developments is that we are dealing with the government here. Hopes have been dashed too many times in the past for investors to blindly step into these stocks with fingers crossed only to have them broken. The nation might see a full vote on the Senate floor by this fall, or it may not, and even then, there is no guarantee it will pass, so buyers beware.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

Stocks did remarkably well this week considering the macroeconomic data. That could be signaling further upside soon for the financial markets.

 

The decline in the inflation rate over the past six months has been encouraging. However, the recent climb in oil and gasoline prices threatens to put a crimp in the trend of declining inflation.

 

As I have written many times before, oil is the fuel that powers the global economy. It is involved in every stage of production and as such, its price has an enormous influence on the rate of inflation. Thanks to production cuts by OPEC-plus over the last few months, the price of oil has risen from roughly $65 a barrel to over $90 a barrel.

 

It was inevitable that this recent strength in oil would begin to show up in the macroeconomic data. It did. This week, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the Producer Price Index (PPI) for last month came in higher than expected. The culprit in both cases was the higher price of oil.

 

Producer prices in the U.S. increased by 0.7 percent in August, which was the highest level since June of last year.  Within the index, energy prices increased by 10.5 percent. The CPI also increased by 0.4 percent on the back of higher gasoline prices.

 

While that was bad news for inflation, the economic picture got a boost as retail sales jumped 0.6 percent. That was much higher than the estimate for a 0.2 percent gain. But much of that increase was due to higher gasoline prices. If you exclude auto and gas, sales increased by only 0.2 percent.

 

Jobless claims also came in lower than expected indicating that jobs are still plentiful in the overall economy.

 

From a global perspective, the U.S. remains the place to put your money and the U.S. dollar reflects that sentiment as the greenback continues to gather strength.

 

Next week (on Sept. 19-20), is the next Federal Open Market Committee meeting (FOMC), The markets are betting that the Fed will hold off on another interest rate hike. Despite the stronger August inflation data, the feeling is that the Fed will hold off and wait to see more data before deciding on a rate rise possibly in November.  

 

The risk for stocks next week is if the FOMC decides to raise rates again. That would throw the markets a real curve ball and likely send markets back on their heels. I give that a low probability given that the Fed would have already marched out several officials to disabuse investors' expectations of a pause.

 

As I have been writing, I expect a bounce shortly. It could take the S&P 500 Index up 1-2 percent or so. I am looking for the high end of this range, given that a pause by the Fed should be received favorably by world markets. It could also bring some relief to overseas markets that have been suffering under the weight of the strong dollar.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.