EPA Administrative Order Closed in Pittsfield

Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City of Pittsfield announced an environmental milestone in its commitment to water quality and sustainability. 
 
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has officially lifted the Administrative Order (AO) 11- 007, issued to the city on Feb. 11, 2011. This action recognizes the city's successful efforts to meet stringent phosphorus limits in its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and to enhance its Capacity, Management, Operation, and Maintenance (CMOM) program.
 
"The City of Pittsfield extends its heartfelt gratitude to the previous administration, community, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, and all partners involved in reaching this milestone," said Mayor Peter M. Marchetti. "Together, we have demonstrated that through dedication, innovation, and collaboration, we can achieve a sustainable and environmentally friendly future for all."
 
Over a decade ago, the EPA mandated Pittsfield to address the phosphorus levels found in the city's wastewater discharge and to rigorously evaluate and update its CMOM program. The AO also required annual CMOM update reports, ensuring continuous improvement in the city's wastewater management practices.
 
In response, Pittsfield not only meet but exceeded these requirements. The project began with extensive engineering studies and an alternatives analysis in 2011-2012, followed by pilot-testing and selection of advanced treatment technologies in 2013-2014. The engineering design and contractor selection
phase spanned from 2015 to 2018, culminating in the construction and startup phase from 2019 to 2023.
 
The centerpiece of Pittsfield's efforts is the new tertiary treatment system at the wastewater treatment plant, specifically designed to meet the NPDES permit's stringent phosphorus limits.
 
This system features a ballasted flocculation process that effectively reduces phosphorus levels to below the permitted 0.1 mg/L. Additionally, upgrades were made to the plant's secondary treatment and biosolids handling systems, ensuring a holistic enhancement of the facility's capabilities.
 
This $56 million construction project, funded through a Massachusetts DEP Clean Water Fund Loan—with substantial principal forgiveness—marked a step towards environmental stewardship. The project is believed to represent an estimated 250,000 person-hours of engineering and construction work.
 
With the closure of AO 11-007, effective immediately, Pittsfield has no further obligations under the original administrative order. The city's current NPDES permit, No. MA0101681, which became effective on November 1, 2021, incorporates CMOM requirements that are as rigorous, if not more so, than those stipulated in the AO.
 
 

Tags: cleanup,   EPA,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories