Letter: Contrast Between Parties

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

Good government is harder than it looks. Good government, like good political leadership, requires getting things done even when people fundamentally disagree, while keeping those same people on speaking terms. Good government serves all of the people, not just those who voted for it. Good government builds on laws and regulations, on debate and compromise.

Only one of our national political parties cares any more about good government. Democrats argue among themselves about particulars, but not about the goals of social justice and good government. Today's Democrats are heirs of the Roosevelts' Progressive movement — which began when the relevant Roosevelt was the Republican. They want to make the government work for the welfare of all. And not just by spending money: the last time the president submitted a balanced budget to Congress and the federal government ran a surplus, that president was a Democrat.

Good government is effective government. Speaker Nancy Pelosi could get stuff done, notably bringing home Obama's Affordable Care Act, which required working through disagreements in the Democratic caucus. They managed to do it. President Joe Biden is getting stuff done, notably the Inflation Reduction Act, infrastructure, and firearms laws — and, like President Obama, while running a no-scandal administration. There's always room for improvement, of course, but fundamentally Democrats want the government to work.


Today's Republican party does not want the government to work. Instead of passing legislation, congressional Republicans stumble leaderless through messaging stunts and irresponsible controversies about basics like honoring debts and confirming appointments. In an act of abject political cynicism, they won't even take a negotiated bipartisan "yes" for an answer to their own demands about border control.

The Republicans admit they don't want the government to solve the problem because their leader wants to demagogue it. If there is a strategy behind the bumbling chaos, it is to make the government dysfunctional, so their voters will conclude that only The Strong Man can fix it. Many of those supporters reportedly would welcome "Der Furor"  as a dictator, brushing aside mushy distractions like debate and compromise and the parts of the Constitution he finds inconvenient.

In choosing this election year between good government and chaos, we should heed the lesson of the 20th century: Fascism arrived via the ballot box. In 2024, voting for good government means voting for Democrats.

Michael Wise
Great Barrington, Mass. 

The writer is the chair of the Great Barrington Town Democratic Committee and of the Berkshire Democratic Brigades.

 

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Meeting on Potential Purchase of Housatonic Water Works

GREAT BARRINGTON, Mass. — The town will set an October outreach meeting to gain residents' feedback on draft findings from an investigation into the feasibility of the town acquiring and operating Housatonic Water Works. 
 
The decision over a town acquisition of HWW would ultimately be made by voters at a town meeting. 
 
The outreach discussion will follow several years of legal and financial study into the town's possible acquisition of the water company, due to water quality issues for many HWW customers. The town hired DPC Engineering from Longmeadow and Harwich Port to evaluate the potential operation and acquisition of HWW.
 
Town Manager Mark Pruhenski said he also hopes to clarify the role of the town manager and Selectboard in the HWW matter. 
 
"We are responsible for representing customers of Housatonic water in a pending rate case with the state Department of Public Utilities and for investigating the possibilities for a long-term solution to the ownership and operation of the company," said Pruhenski. 
 
The town Board of Health is accepting and forwarding water quality complaints to the state Department of Environmental Protection.
 
"While the Selectboard is focused on questions of potential future ownership and operation of HWW, we urge town residents to contact the Board of Health and state DEP regarding water quality," said Pruhenski.
 
View Full Story

More South Berkshire Stories