Williamstown Fin Comm, Select Board Talk Need to Grow Tax Base

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Residents carry a higher tax burden than people in surrounding towns, and the problem will only get worse unless the town sees more development.
 
That was the message from the chair of the Finance Committee during her panel's joint meeting with the Select Board last week.
 
Melissa Cragg framed her remarks with a five-page memo she wrote outlining the current conditions for Williamstown taxpayers.
 
The main takeaways: Williamstown's property tax burden per residence ranks in the top third in the commonwealth and second out of 32 communities in Berkshire County. And the town's per capita spending per resident (removing its 2,000 resident college students) is $4,143 — 15 percent higher than the county average of $3,601.
 
"Virtually all of the disparity between towns like Williamstown, Lenox, Great Barrington and West Stockbridge and the countywide average has to do with education and public safety spending," Cragg wrote.
 
She noted in Monday's meeting that she did not want or expect Williamstown to change its long-standing practice of placing a high priority on funding the public schools.
 
But Cragg did have some thoughts on the revenue side of the town's balance sheet.
 
"Taxpayers can expect their taxes to grow by whatever the budget increases," Cragg said. "Our expenses have been growing over the last 20 years at a compound annual growth rate of 3.6 percent per year. The only two things mitigating that percentage annual increase on tax bills is new growth — either in property taxes or excise taxes or some combination of both.
 
"The more property taxpayers that we have to spread this budget over, the more manageable taxable increases will be. The same thing with higher excise taxes, and where excise taxes come from are things other than property taxes like hotels, motels, cars, boats."
 
The joint meeting of the two bodies was advertised as a discussion of fiscal year 2025 budget priorities, but much of the conversation centered around how to follow Cragg's advice and grow the local tax base for fiscal years well into the future.
 
The conversation echoed a meeting the Finance Committee had last spring.
 
Fred Puddester, who serves on the Finance Committee, said the town has a reputation as being a difficult place to develop properties and needs to find out why in order to make changes.
 
"I don't think we reach out," Puddester said. "Maybe we do. I'm sure the staff does. But I don't think the boards reach out to the [developers] who are doing great work in Pittsfield and North Adams and Adams in redevelopment and find out, 'Why aren't you here?' What is it about our zoning bylaw that makes it difficult?
 
"It is hard. Trust me, I have a lot of experience in this, hard to build economically in Williamstown. … You've got to reach out to those guys and say, 'Why don't you come here?' And maybe we'll disagree with them. But at least we've got to find out why they aren't coming."
 
The Planning Board has in recent years developed multiple bylaw amendments designed to open the door to new residential development by, for example, allowing greater density. Those efforts have had mixed results at town meeting, which has the final say on zoning bylaw changes.
 
Fin Comm member Michael Sussman, alluding to the fact that many in town government see the need to grow the tax base, said those officials need to do more to convince the wider population.
 
"We're talking among ourselves," Sussman said. "The town isn't hearing this. Even though it's on Willinet, the townspeople aren't hearing this. Do we want a special town meeting or something? The people who make the decisions aren't hearing about the problems. The only way I know to do that is a special town meeting."
 
Paula Consolini of the Finance Committee suggested that the town convene a task force to look at the issues Puddester was talking about and bring its findings to the wider community, perhaps to achieve consensus around the need to promote growth.
 
Andrew Hogeland, who serves on the Select Board and represents the town to the Massachusetts Municipal Association, said Williamstown's quest for growth is not unique.
 
"This conversation is not dissimilar from what I'm hearing from people all over the state," Hogeland said. "They all want to attract economic development. They all want to build housing. They all quite don't know how to do it. We're not alone. We're also not special in that way. We're special to ourselves and special to me, but we're not special to people who live 50 miles from here.
 
"And they're our competitors for things."
 
As for the near term concern, the FY25 budget that the Finance Committee will begin considering at its Feb. 21 meeting, Town Manager Robert Menicocci offered some hints at what is to come, including a couple of bright spots, like lower than budgeted utilities costs in the current fiscal year that ends on June 30.
 
On the other hand, Menicocci said the town is looking at contractual obligations that will include a 3 percent increase in staffing costs, and the town is keeping an eye on the impact of inflation.
 
"On the revenue side, I absolutely agree that with our monolithic source of revenue, we need to diversify that," Menicocci said. "There are ways to go about that. Economic development will be one of them, for sure, and we're focusing some energy on that. We can do a little bit of it, but we'll have to be creative. We're lucky we have the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission to call upon to help us with those efforts.
 
"While doing this, we're also reaching out to our neighbors to get some projects moving around the tourism end of things and doing whatever we can to offer assistance to our neighbors to get some stalled-ish projects moving again.
 
Menicocci said new growth in the tax base in FY24 is about a quarter of what it was last year; "still better than the alternative, which is none," he added. But he said revenue from the rooms and meals tax is performing better than expected.
 
"On the downside, there's the whole cannabis situation," Menicocci said. "Definitely the impact fee is gone. It's never coming back. On the excise tax, it's down. Utilization is down. I think we see more facilities coming online in general, but we also see bordering communities in other states coming online, so that's going to have that number also coming down."
 
In general, Menicocci told the two panels what he has in the past told the Select Board: He is pressing his departments to bring forward a bare-bones budget for the next fiscal year.
 
"My direction to department heads is what was mentioned earlier: We're lean. Don't ask for anything," he said. "This is really about a maintenance budget."

Tags: fiscal 2025,   williamstown_budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories