image description

Williamstown Select Board to Seek Data on Short-Term Rental Issue

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Select Board on Monday discussed developing a town-wide bylaw on short-term rentals.
 
But it did not reach a consensus — even about whether to take up the project that the Planning Board asked the Select Board members to address 15 months earlier.
 
Four members of the five-person Select Board appeared to agree that some action was needed to create local guardrails for Airbnbs, as other communities throughout the county have done. One member said the issue needs more study and implied the Planning Board was suggesting the town solve a problem that does not exist.
 
The discussion — the second since the Planning Board's September 2022 "handoff" to the other elected body — came during a joint meeting of the two panels.
 
Planning Board Chair Peter Beck laid out the reasons why local regulation of short-term rentals make sense and emphasized that the kind of regulations the Planning Board started to develop are intended to allow residents to continue to use Airbnb revenue to supplement their income.
 
"In Williamstown, in particular, but also in other places, preserving the flexibility short-term rentals offer to our lodging capacity is important for a town with such spiky demand in lodging," Beck said.
 
Short-term rental is a burgeoning industry that allows homeowners to rent out their residences — or rooms in their residences — on a daily, weekly or monthly basis. It frequently is cited as a way to allow more tourists to visit during summer and foliage season in towns like Williamstown, where there is not enough 12-year demand to sustain more hotels and motels.
 
Although Airbnb.com is just one service that connects would-be lodgers with such accommodations, it has become synonymous with the practice of short-term rentals.
 
Beck noted the benefits of the industry for both homeowners and the tourist economy, but he also pointed to two concerns that led the Planning Board to look at creating rules in the first place.
 
"Preserving the residential character of residential neighborhoods — from a zoning perspective, this is important," Beck said. "If we're going to have neighborhoods zoned as residential where we don't allow any businesses [without a special permit], this has been a way in which kinds of businesses have begun to operate in otherwise purely residential neighborhoods.
 
"Also important for this town, but not just Williamstown, there is a concern about the number of housing units in town. There has been concern about the impact of 'long-term' short-term rentals — short-term rentals where that dwelling unit is used for short-term rental not just when people are out of town, weekends, summer weeks, things like that. Especially, this could happen where there's an investor, an LLC, living far, far away buying up what could otherwise be long-term rental stock or owner-occupied stock."
 
Current and past members of the Planning Board mentioned repeatedly in Monday's discussion that when that board has considered bylaw amendments that could allow more diverse housing options in town (accessory dwelling units, smaller lot sizes, duplexes) one of the objections raised is that new homes such changes might allow would lead to de facto hotels springing up in residential neighborhoods.
 
"Any time we're proposing bylaws like last year or this year to increase the housing stock in Williamstown, one of the first comments we hear is, 'Well, it's going to be used for short-term rentals,' " Beck said.
 
After receiving some feedback from local operators of Airbnbs and taking the first steps to develop a bylaw proposal, the Planning Board in the summer of 2022 decided that it made more sense for the town to have a general bylaw, not a zone-specific regulation of land use, and that the issue was more appropriate to the purview of the Select Board.
 
"Some towns or cities will regulate by zone," Beck said. "We weren't seeing a compelling reason to do that in Williamstown. Also, zoning bylaws are held to a higher [two-thirds] majority standard at town meeting.
 
"The last reason was, often in zoning, we'll encounter pre-existing non-conforming uses when we change the zoning, and folks who were operating under pre-existing rules can keep operating that way or at least challenge the decision in a way that's not true when you pass a town-wide regulation."
 
A key feature of the bylaw that the Planning Board began drafting and "handed off" to the Select Board in 2022 was a limit on the number of days a residence can be rented through AIrbnb in a calendar year. That is the solution many other municipalities have used to try to prevent "outside" entities from buying up housing stock and denying opportunities for it to be used by full-year residents, Beck said.
 
The 2022 Planning Board draft capped that number at 150 days, essentially allowing a home to be rented for the equivalent of 52 weekends and one month each year. But Beck said that number could be amended.
 
"If it's 150 days or 180 or even 250, it becomes unprofitable to run [the home] as a stand alone business," he said. "If you cap the days at anything less than a year, someone is going to put that business in a different town. But you can still rent [your Williamstown home] 200 days a year, and it's a great side income."
 
Select Board member Andrew Hogeland said he thought the creation of a Williamstown bylaw was "long overdue." Select Board Chair Jeffrey Johnson said at the outset of Monday's discussion that, "Leaving this room without a plan is not OK with me." Select Board member Randal Fippinger said it would be "unwise" of the town not to learn the lessons of other towns that have enacted regulations for short-term rentals. Select Board member Stephanie Boyd, who served on the Planning Board when it first worked on the issue, backed up some of the points made by Beck in his presentation.
 
Jane Patton, the longest tenured member of the Select Board, was hesitant to move forward with drafting a bylaw to send to town meeting.
 
"I do find it fascinating that there are 'so many individuals,' not one individual 10 times, coming to the Planning Board about this [short-term rental issue], but it never wafts its way to the Select Board until this conversation," Patton said.
 
"I agree we should get in front of things where we can, but I don't like it when we hear, 'A lot of people are really upset about this.' I don't feel comfortable as a member of the Select Board saying, 'Yes, let's absolutely do this,' when we don't have real hard data. Do we have any data that people are trying to come into town and buy property and do this whole corporate thing that everyone is so afraid of?"
 
Patton said she is not worried about "over-regulation" or government "overreach," per se.
 
"But this feels like we're solving something where we don't actually know the true and total context of the situation," she said. "Until I feel comfortable with that, I can't support this."
 
Patton noted that she does have an apartment above her garage that has been listed on Airbnb. But she said her family rents it infrequently and that she is "not making any money off this."
 
It was not immediately clear during Monday's meeting what data might convince Patton of the need for a bylaw.
 
"I'm assembling a shopping list of the data we would want," Planning Board member Ken Kuttner said at one point. "Number on the shopping list is how many short-term rentals in the database are rooms over someone's garage and how many of them are single, stand alone, single-family homes that are vacant except when being used by an Airbnb? That's what we're looking for, right?"
 
"This is going to sound flip, and I apologize," Patton said. "I want all of the common sense data."
 
"If I'm going to make a shopping list, I need to enumerate … " Kuttner began.
 
"I want the milk, the eggs, the bread and the butter," Patton said. "It's common sense."
 
Other members of the two boards agreed it would be helpful to compile data about occupancy rates for the nearly 200 Williamstown short-term rental sites on the commonwealth's website. It also was suggested that the researchers look for data about how many complaints about noise and other nuisance issues in town are tied to residences occupied as short-term rentals.
 
Boyd and Hogeland agreed to help compile data about short-term rentals that the Select Board can use in future discussions.
 
Although at least one member, Fippinger, expressed a hope that the board could draft a bylaw in time to get it on the warrant for this May's annual town meeting, Hogeland said he thought that would be "a stretch."
 
Planning Board member Roger Lawrence pointed out that the one zoning bylaw amendment his board has spent the year working on, to allow "cottage court" developments in town could be directly impacted by whether the town has a short-term rental control bylaw on the books.
 
"We really want to pass it," Lawrence said. "We really need it."

Tags: short-term rentals,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories