image description
The School Building Needs Commission gets a rundown Tuesday on the general conditions of the city's school buildings.

Pittsfield Panel Hears Next Steps for School Restructuring Study

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The School Building Needs Commission got a look into the Pittsfield Public School's needs assessment that will take place throughout this year.

In March, the commission accepted a bid from Drummey, Rosane, and Anderson (DRA) Architects for the restructuring study after the district re-issued a request for quotes.

"When you look at the city of Pittsfield and the school system, you do want it to be equitable for everybody," School Committee member Kathleen Amuso said.

"And I believe our teachers can teach anywhere they need to teach but we want things to be equitable for our students, we want them to have the same type of buildings, the same type of services, and the academic process that everybody has."  

The month of April was spent on data collection, on-site assessments, timeline planning, and initial engagement with teachers and staff.  May will consist of community engagement events with students, families, and school staff. 

Program and facilities space comparisons will begin in June.

A final report is expected by November with a statement of interest filed with the Massachusetts School Building Authority in January 2024.

DRA representatives Carl Franceschi and Greg Smolley gave an update on the timeline and scope of the work to the panel.

All of the Pittsfield Public Schools aside from the 5-year-old Taconic High School were subject to an initial walkthrough for general condition and functionality.



Upon first look, the team found that most of the classrooms are well sized, the buildings are generally in good condition but with four needing considerable investment, most roofs are in need of attention, the fields are in very good condition though playgrounds have needs, and the parking lots and driveways are in need of repair.

Some accessibility issues and security vulnerabilities were also found, such as having only one barrier of entry as the main access to a school.

"I didn't see anything that made me pick up the phone and call [Superintendent Joseph Curtis] and say 'You really need to address this right now,'" Smolley said. "That's usually the threshold we look for."

Pittsfield High School, Conte Community School, Crosby Elementary School, and Morningside Community School were identified as needing a significant amount of TLC.

DRA plans to distribute an online survey to gauge teachers' and families' thoughts on the schools in the near future. That input will be reviewed by Curtis and will be followed by in-person teacher and staff workshops and the first community engagement event later this month.

Potential meeting dates are May 10 during the School Committee, public meetings on May 16 at Crosby (5 p.m.) and Morningside (7 p.m.,) and a public engagement meeting over Zoom on May 17.

The commission brainstormed ways to best reach students, parents, and teachers during the process.


Tags: needs assessment,   pittsfield schools,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories