Williamstown Fin Comm Pushes for Higher Free Cash Reserves

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Finance Committee on Wednesday generally was pleased to see a fiscal year 2024 town budget that included no projected increase in the property tax rate.
 
But in the penultimate meeting of this year's budget review, the panel had one last request for the first-year town manager: Leave more money in the town's free cash account.
 
Robert Menicocci presented a spending plan that sees a 3.7 percent increase in the town's operating budget from FY23.
 
Thanks to a slight decrease in the town's assessment from the Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District (McCann Technical School) and a tentative 3.16 increase in the assessment from the Mount Greylock Regional School District, the town's total operating budget is up just 3.1 percent for the fiscal year that begins on July 1.
 
The "all in" town and school operating budget for the current fiscal year is $23,122,255; the FY24 plan that Menicocci presented Wednesday is $23,838,195.
 
"Given the salary increases we all want, health insurance costs and inflation, I think it's remarkable this budget comes in at 3.7 percent, and I'd support it," Fred Puddester said on Wednesday.
 
There was one aspect of Menicocci's plan that gave the committee pause. As drafted, his budget severely draws down the town's free cash reserve, taking it from nearly $1.9 million to about $95,000, according to the numbers cited at Wednesday's meeting.
 
Menicocci's budget summary document listed $1.8 million in spending that he intended to fund from free cash — the residual of higher than anticipated receipts and lower than anticipated expenses in any given fiscal year.
 
Before explaining his reasoning, Menicocci quipped that he needed to put some distance between himself and Town Accountant Anna Osborne, lest she kick him under the table from which they addressed the Fin Comm.
 
"Free cash is one of these things that is a 'secret squirrel' item that, traditionally, all cities and towns want to keep in their back pocket as their own reserve to get through the year," Menicocci said. "What we want to talk about is what is the right balance of this that we have a little held aside for emergencies, what the out year looks like in terms of our expectations around free cash. But I also think it's an opportunity to think through transparency and really be forthright around what is available to the community.
 
"I think if we do this as a collective, accepted risk, to say, ‘We know if something happens, we'll have to scurry and figure out a solution.' That's what stabilization is for. Even if we have money designated for capital expenses, we can pivot and pull back on those projects and redirect those funds back. This upcoming year, we have just shy of $1.9 million in free cash available to us. What makes sense is to be transparent about that amount and put some of the money to work for the community."
 
The biggest items on Menicocci's list of targets for the free cash were capital projects ($1.3 million), reducing the property tax levy ($250,000) and stabilization ($150,000).
 
Stabilization concerns the town manager because of research showing the town's balance of $850,000 (including last May's town meeting approval of a $50,000 deposit) is low relative to similar communities in the commonwealth. The benchmarking was not merely an academic exercise; the town's stabilization balance is one indicator credit agencies will look at when determining the town's bond rating, something the town will want to keep as high as possible as it approaches major infrastructure projects, like the recently approved fire station.
 
Fin Comm Chair Melissa Cragg suggested that Menicocci amend his proposed budget to instead leave $250,000 in the free cash account, a number that the rest of the committee members indicated they could accept.
 
Puddester, who repeated his long-standing concern about "taxing people more so we can have money in free cash," said he could live with the $250,000 balance in order to allay the concerns of the long-time town accountant.
 
On Thursday, Menicocci told iBerkshires.com that if he adds money back to free cash, it would come either from the stabilization or capital project expenditures.
 
Wednesday's meeting featured followups by Menicocci on a couple of open topics from previous meetings of the Fin Comm, which went through the budget by department over the previous four meetings.
 
On the sewer rate, Menicocci said the indication from town counsel is that the town cannot preemptively raise the rate in anticipation of a possible change in state regulation that could hit during the fiscal year. On the topic of low wages paid to town employees at the Milne Public Library, Menicocci said he decided to wait until the town receives this spring a report on a wage classification study for all town employees before adjusting salaries in one department.
 
Menicocci said he was struggling with how to address the inequities at the library.
 
"I absolutely, whole-heartedly agree that we will deal with this," Menicocci said. "The end result of how we go about it, the net is the same. It will probably happen at the same time. The one item I'm really concerned about is the equity lens. … My work experience, leading up to here, was in government but very much in the social welfare arena, and social justice was a big, big part of our daily drivers of how we thought about our work.
 
"We've laid out a process of how we want to do that. I think jumping that process, putting someone at the front of the line, doesn't help create the confidence we're trying to build in how we address these issues. Everybody's right. It's a small amount of money. It's not about that part of it. It's really about establishing the transparency and the threshold of how we're going to address equity issues going forward."
 
Osborne told the Fin Comm that the administration did bump up the hours allotted to a couple of part-time library positions to allow those employees to become eligible for benefits; Menicocci previously referred to the town's limit of 19.5 hours per week for the position as "gaming the system."
 
And Menicocci said he followed a recommendation from Cragg in the updated FY24 budget by removing a position in the Department of Public Works that has been unfilled for some time.
 
On the revenue side of the town's ledger, Menicocci offered a couple of insights — one favorable and one not.
 
The town is planning for less revenue from cannabis sales taxes ($225,000 compared to $300,000 in the FY23 budget) because of the impact from neighboring states legalizing recreational pot.
 
On the other hand, the town is projecting $650,000 of revenue from new growth of taxable property due to the conversion of much of the original Cable Mills housing project to condominiums from rental units.
 
"Sixty-one rental units, 13 of them affordable, 48 of them market rate are going condo this year," Cragg said. "The building counted as a multifamily rental building and was assessed on an accumulated value of the enterprise at a much lower value than we will enjoy when you add up all the different units and multiply them by the tax rate."
 
Assuming no change in the assessment from the Mount Greylock Regional School District after Thursday's School Committee meeting, the net of Menicocci's first budget shows an overall expenditure of $24 million with an overall revenue $24.2 million. That keeps the town's property tax rate projection at $16.17 per $1,000 of assessed value.

Tags: fiscal 2024,   williamstown_budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories