image description
Nearly 200 people attended Sunday evening's rally to protest a decision by a conservative Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade.
image description
image description
image description

Pittsfield Rallies for Reproductive Rights

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

 

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Nearly 200 people gathered at Park Square on Sunday in solidary with reproductive rights and to mourn the Supreme Court's overturning the landmark Roe v. Wade decision.

"My wish is that we can take this energy that's here today and all the people that didn't work out to be here today, to really take this energy and to funnel it so that we can take real action," state Rep. Tricia Farley-Bouvier said.

"And the change is not something that's going to happen in a couple of months or even a couple of years but we have to be as strong as the opposition because we know we're that we're the majority, it's just that so far, we're not the majority that votes. So we've got to get to work, we need to do it strategically and persistently."

In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday voted to reverse the 1973 decision that legalized abortion across the nation. This ruling means that there is no longer a federal constitutional right to an abortion and it undermines other right to privacy decisions including contraception, marriage and medical issues. 

"It's pretty shattering," Elizabeth Freeman Center Executive Director Janis Broderick said. "It brings us back more than 50 years."

Massachusetts is one of 35 states, including the District of Columbia, where it is still legal to have the procedure after the ruling. Abortions are potentially illegal or soon to be illegal in at least 11 states and illegal in five, according to Politico.com.

On Friday, Republican Gov. Charlier Baker signed an executive order protecting access to reproductive health care services in the commonwealth. The order gives health-care professionals protection from legal liability from professional sanctions issued under the laws of other states.

"I am deeply disappointed in today's decision by the Supreme Court which will have major consequences for women across the country who live in states with limited access to reproductive health care services," Baker said. "The commonwealth has long been a leader in protecting a woman's right to choose and access to reproductive health services, while other states have criminalized or otherwise restricted access."

Numerous officials have weighed in, with District Attorney Andrea Harrington saying the reversal "threatens the health and safety of women nationwide by limiting access to safe reproductive health care and undermining the public's trust in law enforcement."
 
"Abortion bans disproportionately harm sexual abuse, rape, incest, human trafficking, and domestic violence victims," she said. "This decision will only strip survivors of gender-based violence of their safety, dignity, and autonomy and severely jeopardizes our ability to hold criminals accountable."
 
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren called it a "five-alarm fire" and with other Democrats called on the president "to mobilize a whole-of-government response to protect abortion rights."
 
Two Republican candidates for office cheered the decision, with gubernatorial hopeful Geoff Diehl and Leah Allen, endorsed by the party for lieutenant governor, said they supported "the proper interpretation of our Constitution" by placing the question of abortion back to the states. 
 
Sunday's event was hosted by the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, the Berkshire NAACP, the Berkshire Immigrant Center, the Elizabeth Freeman Center, WAM Theatre, Tapestry Health, BRIDGE, and Berkshire Brigades.

"The right to choose I think is critical to safety and healing," Broderick said. "Clearly in rape and sexual assault cases, you can understand that, but also in domestic violence cases, sexual perversion is frequently used as a tool of control, and making someone pregnant to have a child maintains that control. So this is devastating. It traps you."

She added that this decision talks about the rights of the unborn but there is nothing done to support babies after they are born.

Berkshire NAACP President Dennis Powell is concerned that more rights are going slowly to be taken away.  

"We are in crisis mode, this entire country, and it takes all of us to wake up and realize," he said. "And there's a criminality focus that is going to be attached to this decision and we know who's going to be targeted: brown and black women and teenagers are going to be targeted but this affects all of us. It affects women and men. They're part of our family, they're part of our community so we all have to use our voice."

He said the nation needs action to force those making these decisions out of power and demand change. The first step in doing this is voting.
 
Both Powell and Farley-Bouvier also spoke about the Supreme Court's other decision that makes it easier to carry a firearm in public.

Powell fears that these two rulings may create vigilantes who go after anyone assisting in abortions.


Farley-Bouvier reported that the House of Representatives is getting a legislative package together to strengthen laws in Massachusetts. She explained that Baker's executive decision to protect abortion providers needs to be codified so it cannot be reversed.

"When it comes to the gun laws, of course, there's work that can be done," she said. "We can't undo what the court did, but we can do what we can to protect us here in Massachusetts and we're going to do it."

Harrington was also at the event and pledged solidarity. 

"I want the women and girls of Berkshire County to know that I share your anger and pain today and raise my voice with you to advocate for expanded access to safe abortions and fight against these attacks on women's constitutional rights," she said. 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Planning Board Works to Updated ADU Bylaw

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
DALTON, Mass. — The Planning Board agreed to amend its Accessory Dwelling Unit bylaw one step at a time. 
 
During a meeting last month, the board decided to focus on updating the bylaw to comply with state law before presenting the idea of including mobile/movable tiny houses. 
 
This decision was made because many aspects need to be considered when addressing tiny mobile houses, and it could potentially be a more controversial item for voters. 
 
Board members said separating the ADU bylaw from the mobile/movable tiny house regulation would prevent confusion because it would allow each issue to be addressed clearly and distinctly.
 
Amending the town's ADU bylaw to comply with the state is unlikely to be controversial to town voters. However, updating the bylaw to include moveable tiny homes is a "bigger leap," board Vice Chair Zack R. McCain III said. 
 
"That's just the nature of the town. So, we need to keep them separate," McCain said. 
 
"First, do a public hearing on this bylaw, and do not let this mobile/movable tiny house bylaw get confused with the regular ADU bylaw."
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories