image description

Williamstown Finance Committee Votes $100,000 Budget Cut for FY23

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The town's fiscal 2023 budget will not account for an increase in the town's health insurance costs after the Finance Committee on Wednesday directed the town manager to slash the line item for health insurance by $100,000.
 
Interim Town Manager Charlie Blanchard had budgeted for the cost increase after Berkshire Health Group announced that it needed to raise premiums it passes along to member municipal entities by 8 percent in the next fiscal year.
 
To help cushion the blow to the 31 towns and school districts it serves, the BHG board in January voted to give its members a one-month "premium holiday" in FY23 and cover the difference with the health insurance buying cooperative's reserve funds.
 
Since one month equates to about 8 percent of the year, the net bill to member municipal entities would be the same in FY22 and FY23, if they opt to rely on the one-time "holiday" rather than raise and appropriate enough money to cover the rising cost of health insurance.
 
That is a strategy employed by two of the entities who pass along health insurance costs to local taxpayers through their own assessments: the Northern Berkshire Regional Vocational School District and Mount Greylock Regional School District.
 
Berkshire Health Group's reserves, while ample, are not infinite, and in its board's January discussion it was clear that such premium holidays cannot continue indefinitely. Increases in the cost of health care, on the other hand, could continue indefinitely.
 
That means that if BHG next year imposes a 2 percent hike in premiums but does not offer a holiday, Williamstown's cost would go up by 10 percent from FY22 (the current fiscal year) to FY24.
 
Blanchard, whose term at Town Hall ends in April and who will not be around to see spikes in FY24 or beyond, nevertheless attempted to budget for the increase in FY23 without relying on the offered reserve payout from Berkshire Health Group.
 
He explained that strategy when the Finance Committee initially looked at benefits costs a couple of weeks ago and again on Wednesday night.
 
"They're indicating that the proper rate for this now is 8 percent," Blanchard said. "We've had several years with no increase at all. They're saying, 8 percent is what you need to have in there. And they're saying, to ramp this up, we're going to give you a premium holiday. We've also had premium holidays in past years, and there is one this year as well.
 
"We put in the 8 percent [in the proposed budget] because that is the level that this should be at in the future."
 
Blanchard said the $100,000 "rebate" from Berkshire Health Group would then fall to the town's free cash account, which the town historically has used to offset tax increases in future years.
 
In a year when the total tax levy is increasing for a number of other reasons, the Finance Committee members decided health insurance was one area where it could provide property taxpayers some relief in FY23.
 
"Why would we spend money that we don't have to spend?" Fin Comm member Michael Sussman asked Blanchard.
 
"Better put, why would we tax?" Fred Puddester added.
 
Blanchard favored more of a "pay as you go" approach while recognizing that his budget would, if approved, add about $100,000 to the town's free cash reserve.
 
"The concern I have is, as I mentioned, because we know at some point that has to be there to make this whole budget work with Berkshire Health Group, if they don't do that premium holiday next year, we're up that 8 percent, and if they have even a small increase of 2 percent, you're up to [10 percent]," Blanchard said. "Maybe a possibility, to recognize that future premiums will have to go up, is to put a 4 percent increase in there rather than nothing.
 
"It's really your decision. Both the McCann school and the [Mount Greylock] regional school have decided to do it that way. That is not the way I would recommend doing it."
 
Mount Greylock Regional School Assistant Superintendent of Business and Finance Joe Bergeron on Wednesday acknowledged that the preK-12 school district will, at some point, have to reckon with the 8 percent increase it is putting off in its FY23 spending plan.
 
"The net impact of the 8 percent premium increase along with the 1/12th savings on total premiums paid into the system means we're currently not budgeting in fiscal '23 for an increase, but we know that in FY24, we need to be mindful of what happens when a premium holiday evaporates and, perhaps, you see a premium increase on top of the 8 percent increase," Bergeron said. "That's something we're very mindful of, but we're trying to take advantage of the way the health group has set us up for fiscal '23."
 
Bergeron and Superintendent Jake McCandless were at Town Hall on Wednesday to present the regional school district's budget to the Fin Comm, repeating a process that played out in Lanesborough last week.
 
Bergeron, who represents the Mount Greylock district on the Berkshire Health Group Board, said BHG's reserves currently stand at about $23 million, of which the premium holiday is expected to consume about $3 million (13 percent).
 
By utilizing the entire premium holiday in the coming fiscal year, Finance Committee Chair Melissa Cragg calculated that the town's total tax levy, which would have gone up by 4.1 percent under Blanchard's budget as proposed, will instead rise by 3.7 percent.
 
"The consequence of that is that when whoever is on this board next year comes back and discusses the 2024 budget, there is going to be a big increase in that number next year, potentially, because you're losing the premium holiday, and if there is some further increase, what would be a normal yearly increase will suddenly boost this reduced number by quite a bit," said Dan Caplinger, who made the motion to have Blanchard trim the budget. "But in the meantime, we will have saved taxpayers $100,000, and that's what I'm trying to do."
 
The Finance Committee voted 9-0 to have Blanchard remove any increase in the town's FY23 budget to account for the 8 percent premium hike and instead rely entirely on the premium holiday.
 
A half hour later, the committee discussed the projected water and sewer rates for FY23.
 
The former is projected to rise 15 cents per unit, from $3.70 to $3.85 – a jump of 4 percent from FY22. The latter is expected to rise to $7.52 (from $5.95) for residents on the Hoosac Water Quality District system and to $7.28 (from $5.61) for residents on the Cold Spring Road Sanitary Sewer District.
 
Together, rates for the two enterprise funds (water and sewer) are expected to go up by 18 percent or 20 percent, depending on which sewer system a resident uses. 
 
Part of the increase is due to greater costs to deliver services. Part of it stems from Blanchard's decision to rely less on spending from reserves that has helped keep rates low.
 
The water rate actually went down by 15 cents from FY19 to FY20 and stayed level for three years. The sewer rates dropped from FY19 to FY22 – less than a percent in the Hoosac Water Quality District and 6 percent in the Cold Spring Road district.
 
In the same time period, the free cash reserve in the sewer enterprise fund has fallen from just more than $1 million on July 1, 2019, to a projected balance of $245,803 on July 1 of this year, a drop of 76 percent.
 
Longtime Fin Comm member Elaine Neeley said the town might get some pushback at town meeting about the large percentage jump from FY22 to FY23.
 
"The increase should have been more incremental," said Blanchard, who was hired last April and had no role in the FY23 budget passed at last May's annual town meeting.
 
Cragg said she agreed with Neeley that members of the town meeting may object to the rate spike.
 
"We can continue with the free ride until we run out of free cash, and then they'll get a big bill," Puddester said.

Tags: fiscal 2023,   williamstown_budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories