image description

Mount Greylock School Committee to Decide on Administration Building

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Mount Greylock's Phase 1 Subcommittee meets on Friday at Lanesborough Elementary School.
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Mount Greylock Regional School Committee will be asked Tuesday whether it wants to accept one of two bids to build a new central administration building for the pre-K-12 school district.
 
On Friday, the School Committee's Phase 1 Subcommittee reviewed the bids received for the project, which will replace offices lost when portions of the old Mount Greylock were demolished last year and provide space for public restrooms to serve the middle-high school's athletic fields.
 
One key issue in deciding Tuesday's question: Does the School Committee want to pull the trigger and install lavatory fixtures in those public restrooms now or build the space and install the plumbing to allow for full restrooms down the road.
 
That decision will decide which of the two quotes received is the low bid.
 
The two bids received by the district were very similar. Kurtz Inc. of Westfield submitted a base bid of $2.178 million; David J. Tierney Jr. Inc. of Pittsfield's base bid was $2.184 million.
 
Tierney's bid came in slightly higher — .27 percent above Kurtz's quoted price.
 
But the project was sent to bid with the fixtures in the public restroom as an add alternate, and with that factored in, Tierney is the low bidder.
 
"All in," including the fixtures, Tierney's bid is $2.49 million. Kurtz's is $2.54 million.
 
In September, when the full School Committee authorized sending the project out to bid, it had an estimated price of $2.1 million in mind for the base bid, so the two responding bidders came in more or less on target.
 
That leaves the extra expense for sinks, toilets and urinals as the big question facing the committee at Tuesday's special noon meeting at Mount Greylock.
 
The committee has discussed building the plumbed restroom space now and fund-raising to install the bathroom fixtures at a later date.
 
Phase 1 Subcommittee member Perri Petricca of Lanesborough said the district would save money by installing the bathrooms now, during the building project, rather than going back to install them later.
 
"You're never going to get this bathroom cheaper than you are right now," said Petricca, the CEO of Pittsfield-based Petricca Industries.
 
Asked by subcommittee and School Committee member Dan Caplinger for a ballpark of how much money could be saved, Petricca said the installation could cost 20 to 30 percent more if done at a later date.
 
"You could be over $400,000 in a heartbeat," Petricca said.
 
The multipurpose building, planned for an area south of the middle-high school, is one of the things the district intends to pay for from a $5 million capital gift Mount Greylock received from Williams College at the start of the addition/renovation project at the school.
 
The "legacy" Mount Greylock School Committee — the panel constituted before the district's expansion from a Grade 7-12 district and the election of a new School Committee — identified three priorities for the capital gift: a new administration building, renovation of the school's athletic fields to bring them into compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Title IX and creation of a reserve for extraordinary maintenance (new roofs, boilers, etc.) down the road.
 
The original $5 million gift has been held as part of the college's endowment fund and has grown in value since it was given in February 2016.
 
But the gift also has been tapped for expenses, including design work for the fields and multipurpose building and the construction trailers that currently house the central administration staff.
 
The district offices were housed at the former Mount Greylock. But the School Building Committee and School Committee decided at the outset of the building project not to include those offices in the new Mount Greylock because the Massachusetts School Building Authority, which helped fund the building project, would not pay for square footage for district offices.
 
Likewise, the Massachusetts School Building Authority has a limited budget for "site work" in a building project, and Mount Greylock's building project ate up the allowable exterior expenses long before addressing the playing fields.
 
The School Committee created the Phase 1 Subcommittee to address the need for a new administration building. After an exhaustive search for available existing square footage in Lanesborough and Williamstown, the School Committee decided to go with a new build on the Mount Greylock campus.
 
The athletic fields project is back on the drawing board after bids this fall came back significantly higher than anticipated. The School Committee recently decided to send the field project back out for bid, seeking a lower cost and leaving the door open for maintaining all natural grass fields rather than building a multisport artificial turf field at the school.
 
Meanwhile, the district office staff continues to operate out of converted construction trailers. Ironically, on the day the Phase 1 Subcommittee reviewed bids for a new building, the district's administrative staff was coping with a late night power outage that affected the whole Mount Greylock campus but was particularly hard on the trailers, which are not hooked into the school's backup power generator.
 
The Phase 1 Subcommittee, in consultation with architect Dan Colli of Perkins Eastman and Petricca, determined that either Kurtz or Tierney would be a good partner for the district. Colli noted that Kurtz, while in Westfield, has done projects with Perkins Eastman and work in the Berkshires and is familiar with the building inspector in Williamstown.
 
"I wouldn't worry about the fact that he's in Westfield," Colli said.
 
"Dave [Tierney] has been around a long time," Petricca said. "They do good work."
 
The subcommittee made no recommendation to the full School Committee as to which bid it should select, other than noting that the decision comes down to whether the full committee wants to complete the public restrooms now or wait until later.
 
The subcommittee Friday did decide to ask district staff to issue an request for proposals to find either and owner's project manager or a clerk of the works to oversee the construction of the proposed $2.2 million building.
 
Colli and Petricca told the subcommittee that they could expect to see responses with price tags ranging from $50,000 to $100,000. Petricca named several potential OPMs in the area, and Colli said that any firm that offers OPM services could also provide a clerk of the works if the district decides to go that route.
 
The subcommittee also heard an update from Mount Greylock Director of Buildings and Grounds Tim Sears, who is taking the lead on the district's plan to create space for storage of outdoor equipment and supplies and space for the Nordic ski team to use for waxing skis. Those are two other spaces that were lost in the demolition of the former Mount Greylock.
 
Sears reported that he has spec'd a 50-by-100-foot steel building on a concrete pad for a maintenance garage. Caplinger asked Sears to bring a proposal to the full School Committee at its regular November meeting on Nov. 14.

Tags: administrative offices,   MGRHS school project,   MGRSD,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories