image description
Moderator Bryan Tanner and Town Clerk Carol JJammalo hold elements being used for the borrowing vote at Wednesday's town meeting.

Clarksburg Town Meeting OKs $1M Infrastructure Borrowing

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
CLARKSBURG, Mass. — A $1 million borrowing to fix infrastructure needs passed by a large margin on Wednesday night and the results were met with cheers. 
 
The final tally was 157-43, more than three to one in favor.
 
The approval was a win for town officials who have been talking up the need for the funds over the past year to begin to address numerous repairs of the town's aging roads and buildings, including a roof for the school and an addition on the town garage to cover expensive equipment.
 
"I'm glad it passed," said Select Board Chairman Ronald Boucher afterward. "It's like I said before, we have to do something. This is just the first step."
 
The vote hasn't been without controversy, though not as heated as the debate during the two votes that killed the proposed $19 million school project nearly two years ago. 
 
Robert Bona, who has taken aim at the town's spending in the past including the "boondoggle" school project, rose in defense of the borrowing. 
 
"I've been here for 80 years and we've seen the proudest, nicest town in this whole area," he said. He was proud his children and grandchildren had attended Clarksburg School and gone on to have professional careers. "There are people here who say, 'the hell with the school, the hell with the kids, my taxes are too high' ... 
 
"But I want to live in my house and I want to be able to be proud of where I live. And so many people are not proud of that. Shame on you. Because this town deserves that million dollars."
 
His comments were greeted with a round of applause, as were those by Carl McKinney, former town administrator and selectman.
 
"We have a community that's worth saving," McKinney said. "And if this vote fails tonight folks, I have to question our ability to even maintain this town."
 
But a number of people were wary of cost and the broad language of the borrowing and wanted assurance that it would go to the projects stipulated — and officials wouldn't come back for more. 
 
"How long before you come back and say I need more money?" said a Middle Road resident, adding that the town had allowed the buildings and roads to deteriorate. "I want to live in my house not for my house. ... I want to know that I can afford to live in this town and fix these roads."
 
One woman motioned to amend the article so it listed the projects spelled out at last week's information session; others encouraged language that would specify that only half would be used for the school. 
 
"We hear about the school and the town, but let's face it, the school building is owned by the town, it's a town building," Boucher said. "We're going to apply it to the town buildings, the infrastructure."
 
Moderator Bryan Tanner had with huddled with the Select Board before telling town meeting that the language had been passed by legal counsel and there were concerns about changing it. 
 
"If you decide to make an amendment to it, I can't guarantee that it's going to be approved either by town counsel or the state as they go through the proceedings from tonight," he said.
 
McKinney offered something of a compromise motion "that 50 percent of the debt exclusion go toward school renovation, and 50 percent to other identified town projects" that passed readily.
 
The borrowing will be done through a debt exclusion that passed on a ballot vote of 196-157 on Tuesday night. The debt exclusion means that the cost of the borrowing will not come under Proposition 2 1/2. Instead, the debt will fall off when it is paid off in five years. 
 
Passage at town meeting depended on a two-thirds vote and the larger than normal turnout prompted officials to use the same procedure as the school borrowing nearly two years ago. Voters lined up to get a perforated card with both a yes and a no on it, ripped the  card and dropped their choice into the vote box.
 
The question, Article 13 on the warrant, was also moved up to second place with the understanding that many of the attendees were there for that specific vote.
 
The process went smoothly and Tanner continued on with other articles while the votes were tabulated. The budget items, including a $4.2 million spending plan for fiscal 2020, went through with little discussion and a second two-thirds vote, to transfer $38,000 out of the school stabilization account, passed 160-0. There was an amendment to that article, No. 12, to remove "or any other amount," thereby limiting the transfer to exactly $38,000.
 
Two final articles — on one dogs and kennels and a second on large animal housing requirements and proximity to wells — were tabled after a number of questions were raised about both that could not be adequately answered at the meeting. 
 
The meeting began about 6:30 and concluded at nearly 9 p.m.

Tags: town meeting 2019,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Berkshire Community Action Council Rumors Hurt Fundraising Efforts

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

Most of you are familiar with BCAC. We are the federally designated anti-poverty agency for Berkshire County, serving nearly 12,000 families each year. We work hard to maintain the trust and respect of the communities we serve.

Overseen by the Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities, we are required to comply each year with a rigorous 78 performance standards which govern all aspects of our organization. Proudly, we can boast that we are consistently 100 percent compliant with these standards which range from our community involvement, our transparency in reporting, our administration of programs, our financial accountability and much more. This positions us as one of the best run agencies in the commonwealth. Furthermore, as part of these standards, we are required to survey the community each year to assess satisfaction with our services.

This year, as in years past, we received an overwhelmingly positive response from our community. We just closed our online survey. With 436 individuals responding, 96.7 percent of those surveyed reported that they were either satisfied or very satisfied with the services they received and for how families were treated. We pride ourselves on our accountability using less than 10 percent of our revenues each year to pay for administration.

Given this, we were shocked to hear that there are members of our community who are spreading untruthful accusations about our programs. We pride ourselves on the collaborative way we work with our partners in the community. We have always recognized that we can accomplish more when we work together. We have shared our resources with the community, not looking for recognition but for the sheer satisfaction of knowing that we are able to help close service gaps and serve more families in need of help. So, these rumors are not only hurtful but very damaging to our programming and reputation.

This year, donors have reported that they have heard these damaging rumors, and it is impacting our ability to raise funds to purchase the coats and boots for our Children's Warm Clothing program. I want to assure you that we administer our programs under the highest standards and always with the utmost respect for our families and their well-being. I am asking if anyone is concerned about rumors you have heard, to please contact me directly so that I can address these issues personally.

I can be reached at dleonczyk@bcacinc.org or call the office at 413-445-4503.

Deborah Leonczyk
Pittsfield, Mass. 

 

 

 

View Full Story

More Clarksburg Stories