image description
The preferred field option: No. 3 at the top would be a new multi-purpose field. The field labeled 1 is the current John T. Allen football/soccer/lacrosse field. The white, L-shaped block is the proposed central office and storage.

Mount Greylock Transition Committee Sees New Projected Costs for Fields

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Dan Colli of Perkins Eastman in Boston describes the options to the Mount Greylock Transition Committee.
 
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Mount Greylock Regional School Transition Committee on Thursday got some sobering news about the cost estimates for site work it plans to fund from a $5 million capital gift the district received from Williams College.
 
Architect Dan Colli of Perkins Eastman reported that before the district even considers adding a new multi-purpose field and bleachers to the west side of the school, the district's priority items require a budget a little north of $3.7 million.
 
That's concerning both because the committee has targeted a goal of $1.5 million for a building endowment fund and because many in the community were hoping the school could add another football/soccer/lacrosse field to take pressure off the current John T. Allen Field.
 
The new grass multi-purpose field alone would add nearly $280,000 to the project, bleachers for the field would run $139,000, lighting $383,000 and a press box (with a lift) would cost $242,000. That would make the base price of a new field a little more than $1 million. Make that field artificial turf, and the cost would be closer to $2 million, according to estimates provided by the Boston-based architect.
 
Committee members seemed unwilling to discuss anything that would bring the total project's cost in at more than $3.5 million.
 
"I agree that $3.5 million is our number," Al Terranova said. "I'm torn because we're spending tens of millions of dollars on this [addition/renovation project]. We should build something comparable to that building.
 
"Do what you want, but we can't touch that $1.5 million. That's the Holy Grail. Someone is going to be sitting here 10 years from now when the boiler goes."
 
Of the $3.7 million in Perkins Eastman's baseline project estimate, $1.5 million is for a new building that will house the district's central administration and storage space both for athletic equipment and Mount Greylock's buildings and grounds department.
 
There is no space either for the superintendent's office or equipment storage in the new Mount Greylock because neither uses are ones in which the Massachusetts School Building Authority would participate.
 
From Day 1 of the current $64 million building project, the district has known that the central office, long housed at Mount Greylock, would have to move off-site.
 
Likewise, the district has a couple of four-wheelers and other vehicles for grounds maintenance that "need a home," Colli told the committee.
 
"The MSBA doesn't worry about a rural school might have versus an urban school," Colli explained. "Everyone gets the same."
 
In the same vein, the MSBA puts a cap on the amount of site work that can be included in a building project as costs eligible for reimbursement under the state program. Mount Greylock reached its cap before it got into items like the parking lot or the athletic fields. The former is being funded from an owner's contingency line item in the building project budget; the latter has been targeted by the committee as an expense to be applied to the Williams gift.
 
Included in the $3.7 million figure is $238,000 for accessibility site work on Mount Greylock's current baseball, softball and multi-purpose fields. That includes parking, paths and viewing areas at the fields. An additional $153,000 is designated for site prep and demolition, including the removal of the current non-Americans with Disabilities Act-compliant bleachers and press box at John T. Allen Field.
 
No matter what else the district does, there are two items that are imperative, with or without the Williams gift: finding a home for the central office and addressing the current ADA issues on the athletic fields.
 
As a matter of law, when you spend a certain percentage of the property's value on making improvements to a public facility, you are required to bring the entire facility up to code.
 
"We secured a variance from the [commonwealth's] Architectural Access Board and have to address [field accessibility] in a three-year time period," Colli told the committee.
 
Colli took the committee through several options that were considered for configuring the field and the administration building before arriving at the preferred option.
 
Committee members offered some additional feedback about the orientation of the planned pre-fab building, but most of the discussion centered around the cost and, specifically, how to bring it in line with plan to leave $1.5 million in a building endowment.
 
The cost estimates presented on Thursday were higher than those presented in an initial study presented to the Mount Greylock Regional School Committee in September 2017, but the 2017 numbers included just the field work, at a maximum cost of $2.8 million. At the time, the committee was estimating it could address the central administration space for about $500,000.
 
Back then, the committee was still thinking it could buy or rent existing space for the superintendent. That option that has since been discarded because of the projected cost of modifications to any of the potential off-site buildings.
 
"The purchase price always looked like, 'Maybe,' but when you looked at making it a municipal building, there were code compliance issues that skyrocketed it," Transition Committee Chairman Joe Bergeron said.
 
Chris Dodig, who has been the Mount Greylock (and now Transition) Committee's point person on working with architects on proposals to use the Williams College gift, agreed with Terranova that the $1.5 million reserve target still is an important goal.
 
"It's important to recognize that [the Perkins Eastman designs] are a work in progress, and we as a committee will have to sharpen the pencils and decide what we really want," Dodig said.
 
"I think it's better to use $3.3 million or $3.4 million as a number we feel comfortable spending. … $3.7 million isn't that far from $3.4 million, and I hope we can get there."
 
No matter what path the Transition Committee chooses on the project, the central administration will have to go somewhere in the fall, and on Thursday, Superintendent Kimberley Grady told the committee that on Friday she would start the procurement process on the double-wide trailers she will need for her staff.
 
Grady, who recently was chosen to be the PreK-12 district's full-time superintendent, also discussed the plan for moving the middle/high school into Mount Greylock's new three-story academic wing over the summer.
 
Grady said the district has hired Methuen-based Diamond Relocation to work on the site from June 21 to 28 to pack and move everything being reused from the current school building.
 
"We'll be out of the building altogether on June 28, turning it over to the building project [for demolition]," Grady said. "Only essential personnel will be in the building June 25-28."
 
Space for Mount Greylock and central office operations that routinely continue in July and August has been found at the district's other two buildings, Williamstown Elementary and Lanesborough Elementary, and at Williamstown's Town Hall.
 
"We'll have on the district website where people can be reached," Grady said. "We should be able to receive messages and forward calls through the summer months."
 
In other business on Thursday, the Transition Committee met for about 40 minutes in executive session to discuss strategy with respect to negotiations with nonunion personnel, Grady, and to discuss strategy regarding pending litigation.
 
When it returned to open session, Dodig made a motion that passed unanimously.
 
"I will move that we authorize our attorney, Christopher Strang, to send a letter to our OPM and construction company for the purpose of protecting our rights moving forward and moving to a timely completion of our building project," Dodig moved.
 
The Transition Committee is scheduled to meet again on Thursday.

Tags: ballfield,   MGRHS school project,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories