image description
Affordable Housing Trust Chairman Tom Sheldon leads Thursday's meeting at Ruth Harrison looks on.
image description
Paul Austin of Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity follows Thursday's discussion.

Williamstown Housing Trust Decides on Two Houses at Cole-Maple Property

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Trustee Anne O'Connor, who fills the Select Board's seat on the Affordable Housing Trust board, made the case for building three houses on the property.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The trustees of the town's Affordable Housing Trust on Thursday told Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity to proceed with a plan to build two houses on a Cole 
Avenue lot the trust purchased for the purpose of creating subsidized housing.
 
The non-profit asked the trustees for direction after Habitat generated a proposal that would have sited three single-family homes on the half-acre lot — in keeping with the trustees' previously stated desire to maximize the number of units on the site.
 
That three-house plan — which would have required subdividing the existing two building lots on the property — met considerable opposition from the neighborhood.
 
Abutters first expressed their concerns to a community forum hosted by Habitat for Humanity in January and then brought the same objections before the trustees in their Feb. 1 meeting.
 
On Thursday, the trustees voted, 5-1, to direct Habitat for Humanity to proceed with a two-house approach in recognition of the concerns from abutters.
 
Trustee Anne O'Connor cast the dissenting vote after explaining that she felt it was important the body hold true to the principle of maximizing home ownership opportunities for income-eligible families.
 
Stan Parese, who voted in the majority, reminded his colleagues that neighborhood concerns were on their mind from the day they started the process of developing the lot at the corner of Cole Avenue and Maple Street.
 
"In our [request for proposals] as a trust, which predated in any formal way Habitat's response … we explicitly, as part of our criteria, set forth that we wanted density on the site while being sensitive to the neighborhood," Parese said.
 
Trustee Ruth Harrison, who attended the Jan. 19 public forum along with O'Connor and Trustee Patrick Quinn, remarked that she thought the process had gone well because the board had listened to the residents of the neighborhood.
 
Several of the trustees, including Chairman Thomas Sheldon, said they were surprised when Habitat for Humanity was able to develop a plan that fit three houses on the lot.
 
"Initially, I was very excited about the three-houses idea," Trustee Liz Costley said. "It seemed like a cool community within the larger community. Having heard other points of view, I'm excited about the idea of two houses on that lot."
 
Last week, the trustees appeared on the verge of making their decision about whether to go with two or three houses, but they were persuaded that another public meeting was needed to get more input from neighbors who did not understand the purpose of the Feb. 1 agenda item. One resident said if that purpose had been more clear, the Town Hall meeting room would have been filled with concerned citizens.
 
On Thursday, no residents who did not address the trustees on Feb. 1 rose to address the panel. The only comments from the floor came from a resident who had previously made his arguments at the Jan. 19 forum, in a letter to the trustees and at the Feb. 1 meeting.
 
Though she knew her vote was destined to be in the minority, O'Connor laid out her reasons for standing by the trust's intent to make maximum use of the property.
 
First, she reminded the meeting that, by right, the two building lots in the AHT-owned parcel could have held two duplexes, according to the town's zoning bylaw. So three three-bedroom homes on the site would not be to a stretch.
 
Then, she offered her main reason for voting against the two-house plan.
 
"I'm in favor of three houses," O'Connor said. "I know that makes me unpopular with the neighbors who are in the room. … However, I think it's a measure that's needed for the future of the community. What this speaks to is changing housing practices, changing needs in our community. We have a need for more rental properties, more small homes, more opportunities for families and seniors to have housing they can afford in this community."
 
O'Connor noted that she lives in Church Corner, a town-supported affordable housing project at the corner of Cole Avenue and Church Street, not far from the parcel in question. The Church Corner apartments, in the former St. Raphael Catholic church, have the capacity to house up to 20 people with "no ill effect on the neighborhood," she said.
 
"I feel for some of the neighbors, there's a concern: This is change, and who are these people who are going to be coming in [at Cole and Maple]?" O'Connor said. "Well, they're the same as all of us. They're going to work in our community and build their lives in our community."
 
Sheldon thanked O'Connor for offering her point of view and sharing her perspective as a resident of Church Corner.
 
"I personally prefer a two-home solution here," Sheldon said. "I do so because I do understand and respect the viewpoints of the neighbors here."

Tags: affordable housing trust,   habitat for humanity,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Sweetwood Owner Withdraws Williamstown Zoning Request

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — For the second straight year, the owners of the Sweetwood senior living facility have backed off a plan to ask the town's permission to convert some of its units to multifamily housing.
 
On Tuesday, the Planning Board, which had scheduled a public hearing to vet the proposal, learned that the landowner had withdrawn its request to petition May's annual town meeting to create an overlay district for the Cold Spring Road (Route 7) property.
 
For a couple of years, New Jersey-based CareOne, through its local representatives, have told town officials that Sweetwood's current model, which does not offer more advanced care for seniors as they age, is not sustainable.
 
The Sweetwood complex, which is adjacent to the grounds of the Mount Greylock Regional School, was built on a special permit that allows "assisted living" facilities on the property.
 
CareOne has been asking for zoning changes that would allow multifamily housing — i.e. regular apartments — at the site, a use that is prohibited in that zoning district.
 
Property owners are allowed to take zoning requests directly to town meeting, but the process still mandates that the Planning Board hold a public hearing on such requests prior to the May meeting.
 
"As we saw in a message this morning, the landowner has withdrawn their petition," Planning Board Chair Peter Beck said at the outset of Tuesday's meeting. "So we'll have nothing to act on. … We'll stay posted and see what comes next."
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories