A week after the U.S. central bank's policy shift, Chinese authorities unleashed their monetary policy dragon. The move caught world financial markets by surprise and launched the Shanghai Composite index up more than 9 percent in three days.

 

The People's Bank of China (PBOC) launched its largest stimulus package since the pandemic. The PBOC cut interest rates, reduced the reserve requirement ratio, and introduced structural monetary policies to stabilize Chinese markets, which went straight down for months. 

 

Wall Street analysts are overwhelmingly negative on the Chinese market. Investments in Chinese stocks by  Institutional investors worldwide are at multi-decade lows. China's faltering economy, the never-ending wall of American-led sanctions and tariffs by several nations, coupled with the U.S. election promises of even more to come have made the world's second-largest economy practically uninvestable.

 

"Doubtful at best" was the knee-jerk response to the stimulus package earlier in the week. It would not be enough to bail out the economy say the professionals (who have banked big profits on shorting Chinese financial markets). China watchers insisted that fiscal spending was required for a true turnaround.

 

Almost on cue, President Xi Jinping called for even more monetary and "necessary fiscal spending" support on Thursday in a meeting of the Politburo, the second-highest circle of power in the ruling Chinese Communist Party. That sent Chinese markets rocketing higher again and pulled up global markets, especially in Asia along with it.

 

The largest gainers have been in the commodity space, especially copper. This makes sense. A pick-up in economic growth in China, as the world's marginal buyer of commodities, will mean higher demand for everything from precious metals to soybeans, to basic materials to luxury goods.

 

Did this week signal just a short-term trading opportunity, or has China now made a cyclical low? If the latter, the impact (given that China is the world's second-largest economy) could galvanize growth worldwide, especially among emerging markets. It could also fuel global asset inflation. That would put a kink in the Fed's efforts to reduce inflation in the months ahead.

 

I suspect traders will be watching for additional moves in fiscal spending before deciding. In the short term, however, technical charts say there are more gains to come on the upside. For those who want to roll the dice, there are plenty of Chinese exchange-traded and mutual funds. One could also buy an emerging market fund that includes China.

 

In U.S. markets, U.S. jobless claims fell again last week but the data point of the week was Friday's Personal Consumption Expenditures Index (PCE) for August. The Fed's favorite inflation index came in cooler than expected with a gain of 0.1 percent, less than the forecasted 0.2 percent gain. That good news and the revised GDP report for the last quarter (a solid 3 percent growth rate) gave additional evidence of a potential soft landing for the economy. 

 

On the political front, the presidential race is a toss-up, but the thinking is that both the House and the Senate will surely be divided between the two parties. If so, the markets won't care who wins because nothing will get passed in the years ahead. Markets love that kind of situation. Just look at the last two years' stock market performance in the face of a dysfunctional divided Congress. 

 

October begins next week however the seasonal factors that usually influence the performance of the stock market in September and October have been trumped by the Fed's surprise rate cut and now the potential turnaround in the Chinese market. Stocks should continue to perform with some commodities, precious metals, and emerging markets, leading gains. Overall, I see higher levels, maybe 5,900-6,000 on the S&P 500 Index as possible.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

On the back of last week's half-point cut in interest rates by the Federal Reserve Bank, equities and many commodities rallied anticipating continued growth in the U.S. economy. Why, therefore, did bond prices plunge?

 

Normally, after the Federal Reserve Bank begins an interest rate-cutting cycle, bond prices rally, and yields fall. But not this time. Economists were scratching their heads all week looking for answers. The explanation is straightforward.

 

For weeks before the meeting, many traders were betting that the Fed would be too slow to cut interest rates. And when and if they did it would be a small cut. That delay increased the probability that the economy would dip into recession quite soon. As such, investors bought bonds, the go-to safety trade in anticipation of a hard landing. That had sent bond yields down dramatically.

 

The Fed's larger-than-expected 50 basis point cut surprised traders and reversed that trade. Suddenly, the possibility of a softer landing for the economy has been vastly improved, especially after the Fed clarified that it was ready to match that cut in November if necessary. Buy equities and sell bonds was the new order of the day.

 

Chairman Jerome Powell acknowledged that the Fed's focus has shifted from the inflation numbers to the health of the labor market and the economy. He went to great pains to convince market participants in his Q&A session after the meeting that the economy was still strong, the inflation battle was all but over, and just about everyone was going to live happily ever after.

 

That may be so, but I have a different take on the Fed's actions. We are in an election year. Workers are voters and losing your job can sour one's outlook when deciding which lever to pull in November. Those in government are keenly aware of this. If given a choice between employment or inflation, what would you choose if you were the Fed?

 

The market's reaction to the news is understandable but remember it will be at least two years before the impact of this week's interest rate cut has an impact on the overall economy. Sure, some areas might see a boost sooner but not much. In the meantime, what happens to the economy?

 

The equity market and most advisors will tell you it is up, up, and away. And they are right, at least in the short term. I expect economic growth to continue to show decent numbers and would not be surprised to see a better-than-expected growth rate for the third quarter of this year. I also expect to see additional modest progress in reducing inflation. September and October's inflation numbers, I believe will show a  cooler Consumer Price Index, Producer Price Index, and the Fed's favored index, the Personal Consumption Expenditures Index. That should bolster the Fed's confidence that they have inflation licked.

 

By December, however, I am concerned that things may change. I fear we could see declining economic growth. It will be the result of the cumulative impact of the last two years of abnormally high interest rates.  This lag effect will outweigh the interest rate cuts of September and maybe November.

 

I am not predicting a recession, but only a slowdown, a "recalibration" to use the words of Fed Chairman Powell. Wall Street's interpretation of the Fed's new recalibration policy amounts to lowering interest rates quickly (faster for shorter). If so, it will lessen the blow to growth and ease us into a soft landing. But a soft landing would still be a period of slower growth.

 

At the same time, while the rate of inflation is falling, inflation is still rising, just at a lower and slower rate. And in the background, while inflation still lingers, we have an enormous budget deficit and rising debt load that is now taking more than $1 trillion a year to service. If we add on the stated intentions of both presidential candidates to increase spending by many trillions of dollars over the next four years, we have the makings of both a rekindling of inflation and a coming debt crisis.

 

Next week, we will examine what this could mean for the economy, inflation, the dollar, and the stock market.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

The Federal Reserve Bank's half-point interest rate cut surprised investors and traders alike this week. The central bank also indicated that the markets could expect more of the same in the months ahead.

 

The main three averages soared on the news on Thursday and into Friday. New highs went a long way in dispelling my fears that the last two weeks of September would be rocky. The giant-sized rate cut may have at least delayed the downside that usually accompanies this seasonal period in the stock market.

 

It was the first FOMC meeting in a long time where Fed watchers were unsure how much the central bank would lower rates. Historically, a 25-basis point move would be the usual way the Fed begins a loosening cycle.  Anything more might evoke worries that the labor market and the economy were slowing too rapidly. That, many believed, would not be taken well by market participants.

 

Fed Chair Jerome Powell, in his Q&A session after the meeting, went to great pains to convince viewers that was not the case. "I don't see anything in the economy right now that suggests that the likelihood of a recession, sorry, of a downturn, is elevated," he said.

 

If anything, he hinted the Fed probably should have begun cutting interest rates at its last meeting. As such, the 50-basis point cut was simply a "recalibration"  of central bank policy.

 

The policy has now changed from fighting inflation to making sure the job market stays healthy. "The labor market is actually in solid condition. And our intention with our policy move today is to keep it there," he said.

 

This means to me that in addition to inflation data (such as the CPI, PPI, and PCE), investors will begin to equally weigh how well the labor market is doing. That could mean weekly unemployment claims could move markets as could monthly non-farm payroll announcements. The fact that these data points are notoriously inaccurate and prone to large revisions will be immaterial to day traders and big institutional trading desks. And like so many recent government statistics, leaks in this area are becoming everyday occurrences.  

 

In any event, markets will continue to celebrate the changing stance of monetary policy both now and into the future. A target of 6,250 on the S&P 500 Index is possible over the intermediate term, but that does not mean we go straight up from here.

 

Relief that the Fed has our back (at least on the labor front and therefore the economy)  will be a positive and bolster investor sentiment. It should also help to lessen some of the concerns about the upcoming election. As such, it should be no surprise that the Republican candidate for president has already described the Fed's actions as 'a political move.'

 

That does not mean I have changed my mind concerning the risks that markets will be volatile (both to the up and downside) between now and the end of October. It does mean that for now investors and traders alike can put the Fed in the rear-view mirror and focus on the upcoming earnings season.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

Consumers have been bludgeoned for years by higher prices. In this era of inflation, discounts disappeared as prices of everyday items climbed higher and higher each year. It has been a long time, but value is finally returning in various consumer areas.

 

This summer could be called the season of markdowns as corporations across America have become concerned that price-sensitive consumers have been trading down to cheaper goods and services. Many companies have seen sales decline as discount stores and labels have taken market share.

 

While the Federal Reserve Bank and the Biden administration applaud the progress made on inflation, the truth for the consumer on Main Street is that inflation is still rising. Sure, the headline inflation rate has been falling, but inflation itself is rising just, at a slower rate.

 

After several years of benefiting what airlines called "revenge travel," consumers are balking at astronomic ticket prices for domestic travel. Airlines have reversed course dramatically which has triggered a race to the bottom on domestic ticket prices. Some readers may already know that some big retail chains have been hawking lower prices for several weeks.

 

Even the discounters are discounting prices. Walmart has cut prices on 7,200 products to compete with rivals. Big Lots, after a hit to sales in June, intends to "significantly grow" its close-out bargain business. Retailers like Ikea, Aldi, Walgreens, and Target have also announced price cuts.

 

Auto dealers, after years of jacking up prices for new vehicles, are suddenly seeing empty showrooms and stagnant sales. In July, discounts started popping up around the country and according to Kelley Blue Book, an average of $3,383 per vehicle was lopped off prices. That was the highest level of discounts in three years.

 

Fast-food restaurants, long the haven of low-priced fare, have had some of the sharpest price hikes since the pandemic. They had risen so much that even die-hard fans of places like McDonalds abandoned their burger for food at home. McDonalds, Burger King, Taco Bell, and Starbucks to name a few, have since rolled out what they call "value meals" with great fanfare.

 

Eating at home, however, has not escaped the price crunch. Food prepared at home still saves you money with prices growing at  1.1 percent per year versus dining out at 4.1 percent annually. Yearly food inflation overall has fallen somewhat from a recent high in August 2022 to 2.2 percent in July 2024.

 

The most recent Consumer Price Index showed that the cost of food at home is up 26.9 percent over the last five years and almost 30 percent over the most recent four-year basis. The bottom line: the price level of groceries in aggregate is the highest on record. Sure, some prices are coming down, while others are still climbing.

 

In a sense, it pays to eat healthier today. Items such as apples, frozen fruits and vegetables, potatoes, rice, and pasta have seen price declines while prices for bacon, pork chops, hot dogs, juices and drinks, eggs, and butter are still rising.

 

I can tell you that after years of price increases in my local supermarkets, I automatically select store brands over name brands in most items because they are cheaper. I also have changed my habit of just shopping at one market. Instead, I frequent whatever grocery store offers the best weekly prices for protein, produce, etc.

 

Do I think price controls on food prices would work as some have suggested? Not really. Few realize that most states already have laws to restrict price gouging. They have been instituted for short times with success in times of emergencies such as floods, and other climate-related events, and even in the pandemic in some cases.

 

If inflation continues to fall as economists predict, even the most price-gouging of companies will have to relent and drop prices or lose market share to others. In the end, it is the customer and not the government who will dictate prices, and most consumers are fed up with paying for everything.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

After two years of monetary tightening, the Federal Reserve Bank is poised to begin loosening its policy. Is the event already priced in or will the stock market celebrate with new highs?

 

It may depend on how deep a cut the Fed is willing to make. In my opinion, in the long run it won't matter unless you are one of those day-to-day options traders who live or die based on the next trade. Nonetheless, in a market that may well hit a new high next week, what the Fed does and how it talks about future cuts will be important.

 

Some believe the Fed should cut one-half of a percent (50 basis points), while others are in the camp that it will only need a 25-basis point cut. Does that matter in the scheme of things? My answer is no. There are arguments on both sides of that decision. I come down on the side of a lesser cut. Anything more might signal that the Fed may be worried that growth and jobs are slowing too rapidly.

 

In addition, the U.S. central bank has preferred to use consecutive smaller cuts rather than big ones. The Fed might also be sensitive to the political environment as well. Although the Fed argues it is a non-political organization, one of the candidates, Donald Trump, has already warned Fed Chairman Jerome Powell (who he appointed) that the Fed should refrain from cutting rates until after the November elections. He said a cut would aid the incumbents in a tight race where the economy is one of the key areas of contention. The facts are that no matter what the Fed does, both sides will claim politics played a hand in the decision.

 

The last inflation data before the meeting came in mixed this week. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for August registered a 0.2 percent increase, the lowest since early 2021. That was about what economists expected although the core CPI, which excludes food and energy, increased 0.3 percent. That was higher than forecast.

 

At first, skittish traders did not take kindly to that number. In the bond market, the betting on a 50-basis point cut next week plummeted. Stocks fell in the morning but bounced back as traders realized that a 25-basis point cut was still in the cards. The Producer Price Index (PPI) came in mostly cooler for August, which cheered the markets on Thursday, and betting on a bigger cut rose once again.

 

With so many cross currents, the key macroeconomic variables I am watching for direction are the labor market, the dollar, and bond yields. Weaker job growth will be the Feds' chief concern. A weakening dollar will be good for equities unless we see our currency fall out of bed overnight as it did in August during the yen-carry trade debacle.

 

Lower yields in the bond market have provided a cushion for stocks thus far. That should continue unless and until the story changes. If the labor and growth data weaken sharply, for example, that would evoke worries of a hard landing. In that case, yields would continue to drop but so would equities for all the wrong reasons. Treasury bonds would be seen as a flight to safety, while stocks fell on recessionary fears. 

 

Beyond the economic data, the most popular show of the week was the presidential debate. It was entertaining but less informative than Wall Street would have liked. As far as the economy is concerned, nothing of substance was discussed in depth. While many may bemoan the slogan-filled nature of the race thus far, do not be surprised. It is not that kind of race.

 

Few among us are undecided. Those that are, will largely make their decision based on a particular issue. Inflation is coming down, but not enough. Growth is still robust but slowing. Jobs are still available, but there are fewer. Many other issues such as abortions, immigration, crime, etc. may be more important than economic concerns to undecided voters.

 

Unless one or the other candidate pulls ahead substantially in the weeks ahead, markets will remain volatile and in a trading range until the election. My advice is not to be pulled into the day-to-day ups and downs of the market. This week, for example, we saw spikes in sectors such as solar energy (up), insurance (down), pot stocks (up and down), and crypto (up) all based on a positive or negative sentence or two from the candidates.

 

Last week, I suggested that we could see a bounce in stocks. We did. The S&P 500 Index was up more than 3 percent while the NASDAQ gained 5 percent. But remember, as I have cautioned readers for the last few weeks, we are in a seasonally bad time for equities. The final two weeks in September are especially so, and the Fed's FOMC announcement will be on Sept. 17-18. Chances are that markets will hold on to these gains next week at least up until the Fed meeting. However, be prepared for more volatility after that if not before.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.