Lenox board rejects Curtis Building cell antenna proposal

Print Story | Email Story
The Lenox Housing Authority voted at its Wednesday, Oct. 2 meeting not to go forward with a proposal to put cellular antennas on the chimneys of the Curtis Building and cell equipment in the basement, according to Chairman Edward J. Roche Jr. Roche declined to say why the LHA made this decision, but said the board reserves the right to revisit the issue in the future. Abutters and residents in the Curtis had met and circulated a petition against the project, that week and the week before. AT&T Wireless originally proposed the installation to give coverage to downtown Lenox. The Curtis would link up with a proposed extension of the cell tower at the Lenox Fitness Center. The Zoning Board of Appeals asked, at the Sept. 10 hearing on the proposal, that the LHA request the special permit for the antennas at the Curtis. Robert McNinch explained that the the LHA planned to put the project out to bid, and AT&T might not win the bid. The LHA, as the owner of the building, should make the proposal. Roche simply said the LHA did not wish to make the request for proposal (RFP) for this project. AT&T will withdraw this petition if the LHA does not go forward. Marty Nee, a spokesman for AT&T Wireless, said A&T would look at alternative sites in the Lenox downtown area. AT&T has not entered into any formal negotiations yet; it was too soon for him to say what sites might be considered. AT&T will go forward with the proposal to extend the fitness center tower by 20 feet, from 120 to 140 feet. This tower will cover Route 7 & 20 north and south of the fitness center, but will not cover the downtown area well, Nee said. Antennas typically cover 1 to 3 miles, but the distance varies dramatically depending on the character of the landscape. AT&T came before the ZBA Oct. 8. Sept. 25 Edward Acker, who lives next to the Curtis, held a meeting in the Town Hall to address the proposed cell antennas on the Curtis roof. He hoped to hold the meeting at the Curtis, but the Curtis is a private residence; public meetings are not allowed there. Of the 25 people who came to this meeting, 12 were Curtis residents. Many Curtis residents did not know about AT&TÕs proposal, Acker said; it had been in the newspapers, but they had not been individually notified. He added that the LHA effectively provides the building for events like fire drills. Bill Curry, a physicist from Chicago, came to the meeting to discuss microwave radiation Ñ the kind emitted by cell antennas. Curry is an expert on microradiation who travels and lectures on the effects of cell towers. Acker said he brought a meter and took the participants out to the Lenox Fitness Center tower, to monitor its activity. They took readings a the fitness club and at the Arcadian Shop across the street. The tower was very active, Acker said. Curry told Acker he would not want to live nearby. Residents of the LHA were chiefly worried, not about radiationÕs possible long-term effect on the brain, but about its possible short term effect on health devices: hearing aids, electric wheelchairs, and pacemakers. Many residents of the LHA are elderly or disabled, and use these things. Microwave radiation demonstrably interferes with all of them, Acker said; cell phones are not allowed in hospitals. Acker and several LHA residents began circulating a petition opposing the Curtis cell tower proposal. Acker said he asked to put up posters at the Curtis, and pass out flyers; this is not allowed either. As of the following Wednesday, the petition had nevertheless gathered 100 signatures. 40 were LHA residents Ñ out of approximately 60 apartments in the building. Acker said he also had help from June MacFarland. The MacFarlands brought Sarah Clarke, a health activist, to the Sept. 10 ZBA hearing, to discuss the possible dangers of living or working near a source of cellular radiation. Clarke in turn helped Acker to get in touch with Curry. Acker added that a woman called him to say she had moved out of her house in Boston after three cell towers went up in the area; she began having headaches and memory problems. Nee said if the LHA had chosen to go forward with its proposal, AT&T would have addressed any concerns the residents had about the radiation. AT&T has never had any problems at any of its tower sites, he said. ÒWe have them on the roofs of most hospitals in the greater Boston area.Ó Hospitals are high buildings, and they use their own radio frequencies to communicate over radio. AT&T is licensed to offer coverage throughout the Berkshires, Nee said. They are expanding their coverage throughout the county.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Clarksburg Select Board Accepts School Roof Bid, Debates Next Steps

By Tammy Daniels iBerkshires Staff
CLARKSBURG, Mass. — The Select Board last week accepted a bid by D.J. Wooliver & Sons to do the flat roof on the elementary school. 
 
Wooliver was the lowest bid at about $400,000 but cautioned that the cost may rise depending on the conditions once the work started. The work will depend on town meeting approving a borrowing for the project and a possible debt exclusion.
 
But how much borrow and whether the work will be worth it has been a conundrum for town and school officials. The condition of the school has been a major topic at meetings of the board and the School Committee over the past few months. 
 
Town officials are considering putting the question to the voters — try to piecemeal renovations or begin a new study on renovating or building a new school. 
 
In the meantime, the leaking roof has prompted an array of buckets throughout the school. 
 
"Until they actually get in there and start ripping everything up, we won't really know the extent of all the damage per se so it's really kind of hard to make a decision," board member Colton Andrew said at last week's meeting, broadcast on Northern Berkshire Community Television.
 
Board member Daniel Haskins wondered if it would be better to patch until a town made a decision on a school project or do a portion of the roof. But Chair Robert Norcross disagreed. 
 
View Full Story

More North Adams Stories