DALTON, Mass. — During the special meeting on Tuesday, Fire District voters approved borrowing up to $350,000 for the purchase of a new ambulance and any related costs.
Approximately 27 voters attended the meeting at the Stationary Factory, which lasted less than 10 minutes.
The only article on the warrant overwhelmingly passed with only one voter against it.
The no vote came from Tom Betit, who expressed his concern regarding the financial decisions and actions taken by the Fire District.
He requested the status of the "imaginary ladder truck" and was directed by the moderator to reach out to the district following the meeting because the topic was unrelated to the warrant article.
He also accused the district of "giving away trucks."
"Most recently, [former chief James Peltier] gave away a $50,000 truck to the town of Bolton," Betit said.
Betit was again informed by the moderator that this was also not a topic related to the article on the warrant and should be taken up with the district following the meeting.
"I called [District Clerk and Treasurer Melanie Roucoulet] repeatedly to request information. I stopped down and talked to [Prudential Committee committee member Thomas Murray] about it. He wasn't very receptive. What's with all the secrets," Betit said.
The article explains that the vehicle he is referencing is a 1996 Stewart 1078 2 1/2-ton military vehicle obtained under the state surplus program.
The article quotes Bolton Fire Chief Jeffrey Legendre, saying, "Surplus vehicles either come from the state or federal sources. The truck we were able to get came from the Dalton Fire Department. Chief Jim Peltier could release it from his fleet since they were given a grant for a new vehicle."
Early Wednesday, Board of Water Commissioners Chair James Driscoll explained that participating in the state surplus program did not cost the district any money. The department was not using the military apparatus, so the program allowed it to be given to Bolton.
The program only has a surplus of military equipment, not ladder trucks or ambulances, Driscoll said.
No other voters stood to express concern regarding purchasing a new ambulance.
The station has two ambulances — a 2016 International and a 2019 Ford 50. However, only the Ford 50 still operates as an Advanced Life Support vehicle. It has been demonstrated both vehicles need to be replaced because of their deteriorating condition.
Based on communication with ambulance purveyors, it was previously thought it would take three-year build time and a projected cost of about $450,000 to $500,000 for a new ambulance.
However an unanticipated opportunity came up — a buyer had backed out of a vehicle order at the last minute, so an ambulance became available early.
The anticipated cost is about $345,000 to be rolled out as an Advanced Life Support unit. This includes transferring the radios and power load stretcher system from the district's old ambulance.
The remaining funds will cover the ambulance's decals.
This apparatus is an F450 series, a pickup-style, two-wheel drive, so it would have a larger motor and transmission, heavier-duty brakes, and be an all-around heavy-duty vehicle.
Additionally, the price increase that the district would face if it waited three years would no longer be a concern because the trade-in value is greater now.
The department's 2019 Ford 50 has a trade-in value of $30,000 and its 2016 International $2,500. The district will be trading in both.
Voter William Drosehn, chair of the town's Finance Committee, asked about the bond and cautioned against choosing one that is longer than the vehicle's lifetime.
Roucoulet explained that the district has a financial adviser through UniBank that will put it out to bid.
The district has yet to determine the longevity of the loan it intends to go for, but Roucoulet explained in a follow-up that she does not expect it to be longer than four years. Driscoll said whatever funds the district has left over after the purchase and decal will go toward paying off the loan.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
Berkshire High Schools Release Statement on Fan Behavior at Athletic Events
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Berkshire County superintendents, principals, and athletic directors have released a statement addressing fan behavior and sportsmanship at high school athletic contests.
Ahead of the Winter Sports Season, all Berkshire County superintendents and principals met to discuss concerns regarding conduct at school sponsored athletic events. As a result of this meeting, a message was crafted as a reminder of the expectations for conduct at all sporting events.
According to the statement:
Berkshire County superintendents, principals, and athletic directors feel that there is a need to address fan behavior and sportsmanship at high school athletic contests that are not in keeping with our schools' core values and beliefs. We believe it is imperative that all participants and attendees experience a sense of belonging at these events. This means all student-athletes, coaches, and officials should be able to carry out their duties on the field of competition without fear of verbal or physical attacks. Behavior by students, coaches, fans, or other attendees that is unwelcoming or hostile will not be
tolerated. All of our schools strive to provide inclusive and family-friendly events. In an effort to maximize the value of educational athletics, we have agreed upon the following priorities as we head into the winter athletic season:
All superintendents have committed to providing comprehensive communication to community stakeholders to ensure consistency in messages regarding conduct at sporting events.
All superintendents have committed to providing appropriate staffing at each event to supervise and monitor participants and fans.
All coaches, student-athletes, and administrators will model the expectations for good sportsmanship at each event.
All schools have agreed upon a minimum 2-week suspension period for fans removed from an event.
All schools will continue to reinforce and model MIAA guidelines.
Finally, we appreciate our school communities for supporting our athletic programs. All fans should feel welcome in all venues. Sportsmanship is the expectation. Let the players play, let the coaches coach, and let the officials officiate.
During the special meeting on Tuesday, Fire District voters approved borrowing up to $350,000 for the purchase of a new ambulance and any related costs.
click for more
The Tavern at The A is again looking for a new operator with a hopeful opening in the spring. First, it must be able to transfer the liquor license. click for more
On Tuesday, Hearthway Inc. hosted a ceremonial groundbreaking for 37 new units of supportive housing, 28 on vacant land on West Housatonic Street and nine at Zion Lutheran Church on First Street.
click for more
The owners say they are plagued by the costs of stabilizing a rundown property that should not have gotten to its current state and cite "inhibitive" taxation from the Baker Hill Road District.
click for more