Pittsfield Tax Rate May Drop But Bills Rise

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Mayor Peter Marchetti has proposed a decrease in the city's tax rate but because of rising property values, the average homeowner will see an annual increase of more than $350.

There will be a tax classification hearing during Tuesday's City Council meeting, which begins at 6 p.m.

For fiscal year 2025, the first-year mayor has put forward a residential tax rate of $17.94 per $1,000 of valuation and a commercial, industrial and personal property tax rate of $37.96 per $1,000 of valuation.  
The rates use a residential factor of 0.827103 at a shift of 1.75 to the commercial side.

The $114,615,097 levy limit for fiscal 2025 includes $2,726,686 in new growth, a 4.72 percent increase from the previous year. Pittsfield's real and personal property valuation is $5,270,539,121.

In one year, the average residential property value has increased by $27,377, the median residential property by $22,850, and the median commercial property by $12,750.

The proposed residential rate is 51 cents lower than FY24 and the proposed commercial rate decreased by $1.65. In FY25, the average single-family home is valued at $295,291 for a tax bill of $5,297.52 annually, compared to the average FY24 home valued at $267,914, which paid $4,943.01.

The 7.17 percent increase would shake up to about $30 additional dollars per month for homeowners.  The bill hike is less than FY24, which raised annual taxes by $397.82 for the average homeowner.

The median city home valued at $256,500 would see an increase of about $290.77, paying $4,601.61 annually, and the median commercial property worth $224,250 would see an increase of $135.01 annually.



A single tax rate for FY25 would be $21.69, a 95-cent decrease from the previous year.

According to data provided by the administration, Pittsfield lost two single-family homes between FY24 and FY25. The city's 11,326 single-family homes are valued at about $3.3 billion, a $309 million or 10.2 percent increase.

Pittsfield's total residential value including multi-families and condominiums is $4,283,149,542, a $414,172,205 increase from the previous year.

Data shows that the city lost three commercial properties.  

The city's 818 commercial properties worth $449,357,652 saw a 3.3 percent increase in value, the 260 industrial properties worth $154,460,407 saw a .8 percent increase in value, and the $1,820 personal properties worth $383,571,520 saw a 4.9 percent increase in value.

Last year, the tax classification was tabled because some councilors didn't want to vote before free cash was certified. The FY25 recapitulation sheet shows $2.5 million in free cash appropriated to reduce the tax rate.

The city expects to raise a total of $232,299,670.99, which includes property taxes and local receipts.


Tags: fiscal 2025,   pittsfield_budget,   tax classification,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield School Officials Want Summary of PHS Investigation

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — While it is unclear how much information will be released, School Committee members want some executive summary of the Pittsfield High School investigation into alleged staff misconduct.

On Wednesday, they requested a capsulation of the process and, if possible, the findings of Bulkley Richardson & Gelinas' investigation triggered by allegations against Dean of Students Molly West and Vice Principal Alison Shepard that surfaced in December.  

"Right now, the public has the seven of us sitting up here saying nothing was substantiated," said Mayor Peter Marchetti, who motioned for an executive summary.

"And quite frankly, part of the argument may be its cost, but how much money have we already spent and how much time have we gone down this rabbit hole to still have this black cloud hanging over our head without the public buying into anything that happened?"

As far as he is concerned, the city is "in for a penny in for a pound." The lead investigator, Judge Mary-Lou Rup, was hired at a rate of $275 per hour and paralegal services for $110 per hour.  

"And whatever legal counsel can produce, I think that we have to live with it, but to just say we're not doing it at this stage in the game I think is a mistake," he said.

Committee member William Garrity requested that discussion about the investigation's reports be put on the agenda. The district's legal counsel has reportedly advised against releasing the report even though officials pledged transparency when the scandal arose.

"I feel there is at least some balancing act that we need to figure out between protecting the privacy of the report and people being investigated and people who are part of the investigation while still maintaining the public's right to know," he said.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories