image description
The bridge over Onota Brook on Peck's Road was closed last month because of its condition. The council on Tuesday approved seven utility pole installations and relocations to move the project along despite having maps they could barely read.
image description
Councilor at Large Earl Persip III objected to the barely legible maps and voted against the petitions.
image description

Pittsfield Councilor Demands Legible Maps from Project Applicants

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — One city councilor has a clear message for project applicants: "Make sure I can read your map."

Councilor at Large Earl Persip III was the lone vote in opposition to utility pole petitions from Eversource and Verizon New England on Tuesday night. The companies plan to install one new pole, relocate two existing poles, and set two anchor poles on Peck's Road for the Onota Brook bridge replacement.

The bridge was closed to traffic last month because of rapid deterioration and awaits a full reconstruction.

"I can't read the map. I don't know where the pole is going. I've said it a billion times. I say we table this until we get a map," he said.

"I can't approve anything that I can't see. I don't know where the pole is going, no one can show me where the poles are going, so I'm voting no. I've said this a zillion times to many, many people, many, many different organizations. If we can't read maps, how do we approve anything?"

Two maps were provided in the packet: one with an illegible outline of the intersection of Onota Street and Peck's Road with markers for the pole and another with a legible outline of the area. They are just drawings of the road and not an aerial photographic view.

Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales confirmed that the first provided image was illegible and that a second map was provided with the locations of the poles, street names, and the bridge location.

"This is an important project for us to complete in the process of moving these poles for the removal and then rebuilding of Peck's Road bridge," he said.

"It has taken a long time for this to be coordinated and that's why there's been a request to not push this further. It is a humble request from from me."

He said he understands that there have been difficult-to-read maps and drawings in the past but he considered this legible.  

Persip pointed out that he and Morales have had this conversation.

"If this is so important, why isn't the due diligence done to make sure we have the information?" he said.

"We've been doing this map thing for at least six years now with Eversource, with Verizon. It's not hard, we compliment when they do them good and so I'm a no-vote. There's nothing you can do here today that's going to make me a yes."

Eversource representative Nicole Scarborough reported that this should not affect any residential driveways.

"We're not going to put anything right next to somebody's driveway so it can get hit," she said. "We want to protect the poles. We want to protect the circuits and the wires that we have up there so we don't have outages."


Morales reported that ground has not been broken on the project but will be soon. The nature of the bridge renovation has changed to a total reconstruction after the Massachusetts Department of Transportation that found six areas of deterioration.

"The project, though, has started with fabricating the precast and demolition proposal," he said.

"It has changed since we had to close the building the bridge fully and that at the moment, is slated for full demolition to start end of the month."

Ward 7 Councilor Rhonda Serre didn't want to further delay the project by delaying this approval, pointing out that the road is closed and traffic has been rerouted through residential neighborhoods that aren't used to it.

She agrees that maps are a frequent problem.

"And knowing that we are ready to move forward and this project will actually — shovels will start soon, I would request that we consider finding a way to approve this tonight so that a further delay in these poles doesn't impact the reconstruction of the Pecks Road bridge any further," she said.

Morales explained that this was always a part of the process but it is coming before the council "in a rushed fashion" because of how the bridge demolition has to occur.

"Before we do that, we need to move the crane to a location where wires are in the way," he said. "So we need to first eliminate and move those wires out of the way so it is definitely a last-minute change. We were always going to move these poles but not specifically at this point in time."

Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren recognized that Persip has raised this issue many times to his agreement but in this case, he saw enough information to figure it out.

"Hopefully I'll never hear the word 'map' again," he joked.

Councilor at Large Kathy Amuso pointed out that "almost every time" Verizon is on the agenda, the council talks more about illegible maps.

"When you see these agenda items and the maps aren't clear, I'd like to you say, 'We're not even going to put it on the agenda,'" she said to President Peter White.

Persip said nobody could tell him what addresses the poles are going in front of and the council only has a general idea of the location.

"I've never been so irritated up here, I don't think," he said.

"This is such a small little thing. I agree, but it still baffles me that we are getting things like this presented to us."


Tags: bridge project,   eversource,   utility pole,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Berkshire Community Action Council Rumors Hurt Fundraising Efforts

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

Most of you are familiar with BCAC. We are the federally designated anti-poverty agency for Berkshire County, serving nearly 12,000 families each year. We work hard to maintain the trust and respect of the communities we serve.

Overseen by the Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities, we are required to comply each year with a rigorous 78 performance standards which govern all aspects of our organization. Proudly, we can boast that we are consistently 100 percent compliant with these standards which range from our community involvement, our transparency in reporting, our administration of programs, our financial accountability and much more. This positions us as one of the best run agencies in the commonwealth. Furthermore, as part of these standards, we are required to survey the community each year to assess satisfaction with our services.

This year, as in years past, we received an overwhelmingly positive response from our community. We just closed our online survey. With 436 individuals responding, 96.7 percent of those surveyed reported that they were either satisfied or very satisfied with the services they received and for how families were treated. We pride ourselves on our accountability using less than 10 percent of our revenues each year to pay for administration.

Given this, we were shocked to hear that there are members of our community who are spreading untruthful accusations about our programs. We pride ourselves on the collaborative way we work with our partners in the community. We have always recognized that we can accomplish more when we work together. We have shared our resources with the community, not looking for recognition but for the sheer satisfaction of knowing that we are able to help close service gaps and serve more families in need of help. So, these rumors are not only hurtful but very damaging to our programming and reputation.

This year, donors have reported that they have heard these damaging rumors, and it is impacting our ability to raise funds to purchase the coats and boots for our Children's Warm Clothing program. I want to assure you that we administer our programs under the highest standards and always with the utmost respect for our families and their well-being. I am asking if anyone is concerned about rumors you have heard, to please contact me directly so that I can address these issues personally.

I can be reached at dleonczyk@bcacinc.org or call the office at 413-445-4503.

Deborah Leonczyk
Pittsfield, Mass. 

 

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories