Pittsfield: Toters Are a Go

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city is toter-lly ready for a new trash system.

Call it a victory for Mayor Peter Marchetti, who was able push through in six months a new waste pickup model that had eluded his predecessors. 

The City Council approved draft five-year contracts with Casella Waste Management on Tuesday, moving Pittsfield from unlimited curbside collection to automated collection with 48-gallon toters for trash and recycling.

Recycling will begin on Sept. 13 and trash routes will start on Oct. 18 with toters provided at no cost to residents. Officials predict this will trim the trash budget by about $600,000 to $4.6 million, with $80,000 in savings embedded in the FY25 operating budget.

"There has been more communication and education, at least, about this rollout than I've seen before," Councilor at Large Kathy Amuso said.

Solid waste and recycling pickup was the main point of contention.

The contract for collection passed 8-3 with Councilor at Large Alisa Costa, Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren, and Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey in opposition and the contract for Casella's operation of the transfer station at 500 Hubbard Ave passed unanimously.

Warren explained that he is not against the contract but has issues with the procedure and some of the terms. He suggested that if the councilors "really don't scrutinize this contract," they are doing a disservice to the city.

"We need to learn by our recent mistakes. The settlement contract case where we were sued, the cannabis case, by companies based on the contract and without getting into specifics, let's just say better scrutiny of the contract would have protected city taxpayers," he said.

"And someone will say 'Well, that doesn't apply here' but there are minor errors in the contract as we talk that have not been addressed."

Last month, the council voted to refund a sum of more than $786,000 to three local cannabis dispensaries for allegedly "unreasonable" Host Community Agreement fees, a lawsuit that has popped up around the state

Warren brought up past traumas of the council chambers, pointing out that if there was an appropriate time to make a charter objection it would be with this contract.

"I am not going to support voting for this," he said. "There's no rush, we've operated without a contract for over a year."

Costa also felt that the contract seemed rushed.  Several amendments were sent to the council in advance of the meeting, including terms that were requested during a Committee of the Whole hearing.  
She had concerns about a lack of bilingual education specified in the terms and community members who were not reached, adding, "I feel like I should wear a sign when I'm downtown that says, 'Talk to me about trash.'"

"I think you did a great job in making the case for the 48-gallon toters, for automation, for the cost savings, all of that is great. Unfortunately, a lot of people don't know that and I do feel, gosh, I feel like — I can't believe I'm saying this: I agree with a lot of what Councilor Warren said," she said.



"As somebody who works in the community, and this is a community rollout, it's something really important in the daily lives of people and their quality of life, I've made mistakes in my own career of rushing and I do feel the pressure of this. We have a timeline and all that but rushing is where we make mistakes that often harm when we didn't mean to because we didn't talk to the right people, enough people."

Officials say Pittsfield's nearly 17,400 households produce about 1,800 pounds of trash each annually, collectively generating close to 20 tons as a community. The proposal aims to reduce each household's waste to 1,370 pounds annually.

For an extra $40 quarterly, households can have a second 48-gallon toter for trash and a free toter for additional recycling. The aim is to encourage recycling over throwing away solid waste.

"I don't know how much communication I can do in two weeks," Mayor Peter Marchetti said.

If the council did not approve the agreements, there would be an $80,000 deficit in the budget for public services.

"I think this is going to be one of those things, I kind of agree with the mayor, where two weeks is not going to change the communication and most people won't care about it until we ramp up our push to give everybody this information," Councilor at Large Earl Persip III said, explaining that he wants to get it rolled out before winter time.

Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey and Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi expressed concerns about the impact of 48-gallon toters on larger families.

"I have spoken about the stressors on young and growing families," she said, pointing to the prices of owning a home and rising taxes.

"If we find ourselves in a place where all of our growing families or young families are under this immense stress, I hope that we can find a better solution for them," Lampiasi said.

The council also approved a formula-based approach for water and sewer rates aimed to fairly adjust rates yearly using the Consumer Price Index Factor (CPIF) and the Operational Stability Factor (OSF) and an eight percent raise for the rates.

The average water bill for one toilet will increase by about $24 per year, rising from $295.52 in FY24 to $322.44, and the average sewer bill will increase by about $30, rising from $378.80 in FY24 to $409.12. The annual bill would total around $732.

Additional toilets would rise from about $149 in FY24 to about $161 for water and about $190 in FY24 to about $205 for sewer, totaling about $366 annually. Metered water would rise from $2.16 per cubic foot in FY24 to $2.33 for water and from $4.50 to $4.86 for sewer.

In FY24, water rates rose 12 percent and sewer rates 25 percent.


Tags: trash,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories