Mass Receives Federal Funding to Remove Lead Service Lines

Print Story | Email Story
BOSTON — The Biden-Harris Administration awarded more than $50 million in funding for Massachusetts cities and towns to help identify and replace lead service lines and prevent exposure to lead in drinking water. 
 
Following advocacy by the Healey-Driscoll Administration, federal delegation, Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell, and Treasurer Deborah Goldberg, the federal funding announced today is an increase over the $33.7 million in lead service line funding allocated in fiscal year 2023 but presents a gap between the identified funding needs in Massachusetts. The Healey-Driscoll Administration will continue to work with federal, state, and local agencies in order to fully fund the lead service line replacement program. 
 
"We appreciate the Biden-Harris Administration's willingness to engage with states on important environmental and public health issues, particularly one with such widespread and acute impacts as lead in drinking water," said Governor Maura Healey. "We're looking forward to continued collaboration with federal partners to identify more funding avenues to build on these investments so Massachusetts can continue its nation-leading work to protect the environment and public health." 
 
In February, Governor Healey, Attorney General Campbell, and Treasurer Goldberg submitted a letter to EPA Administrator Michael Regan urging him to reconsider the new grant formula that had reduced lead service line replacement funding to Massachusetts by more than $30 million. The letter identified Massachusetts' unique needs for lead remediation funding based on the high percentage of housing stock from before 1940, when the use of lead in service lines was prevalent and emphasized how the effects of this today cause disproportionate lead exposure in communities of color. Massachusetts received $65.7 million in fiscal year 2022 but was only allocated $33.7 million for 2023 and future years of the program under the EPA's new methodology. Following advocacy from Massachusetts and other states, the EPA allowed states a onetime opportunity to submit additional data,
 resulting in Massachusetts' boosted allotment of $50 million. 
 
Massachusetts has leveraged federal Bipartisan Infrastructure money to address lead service line issues, including commitments since 2022 of more than $59 million for lead remediation projects. This funding has supported needs assessments and action plans in 121 Massachusetts communities and has financed $30 million in remediation projects. 
 
The funding awarded under President Biden's $3 billion Investing in America initiative will provide significant grants through the Massachusetts Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Lead Service Line Program. Under the Revised Lead and Copper Rule set to take effect in October, the EPA is also requiring local public water systems to investigate the number of lead service lines in their water distribution system and report those findings to the state agency that oversees drinking water – in Massachusetts that is the Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP). 
 

Tags: MassDEP,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories