image description

Williamstown Fire District Shifts to CM at Risk Model for Fire Station Project

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — After disappointment in the response to the Fire District's first request for bids, the Prudential Committee on Wednesday decided to go with a different method to find a contractor for the Main Street station project.
 
By a vote of 4-0, the committee opted to put the project out to bid under the construction manager at risk model.
 
Earlier this year, the station was put out to bid under the "design-bid-build" model, the other process allowable under Massachusetts law for a project this size.
 
That request for proposals yielded just one bid, for $18,936,159, from Allegrone Construction.
 
The district had been operating with an estimated cost of between $16.5 million and $17 million for the station, which will replace the district's aging and cramped facility on Water Street.
 
Bruce Decoteau, who advises the district's Building Committee on the project, said there is enough money in the budget to go a little over the $17 million construction estimate (district voters authorized up to $22.5 million for the total project, including soft costs). But the $18.9 million bid was seen to be too far in excess of the estimate.
 
On Wednesday, Decoteau and John Benzinger of the district's owner's project manager, Skanska, said that while searching for a CM at risk, the district can proceed with a value engineering process that hopefully will bring costs down — a process that can continue even after a CM is named.
 
"Allegrone wanted to negotiate, but we can't legally do that," Benzinger said, referring to the commonwealth's procurement process under design-bid-build. "With a CM at risk scenario … we can value engineer with them. It's just a lot different playing field than a straight Chapter 149."
 
Benzinger said based on his communication with other professionals in the field, the district could receive four to six CM at risk candidates.
 
"I'm fairly confident we will [have candidates]," Benzinger said. "There's a group of firms out there that don't like to do hard bid work. Consigli is an example. It's not how they want to conduct their business. It's very cut throat. They'd rather be in a negotiated situation where they can be a partner with the owner."
 
Under a CM at risk model, the construction manager is a general contractor, who receives a fixed fee for their services and delivers a building for a guaranteed maximum price.
 
Decoteau and Benzinger told the Prudential Committee, which held a joint meeting with the Building Committee, that the change to a new bid method ought not throw off the station's construction timeline to a large degree.
 
The CM at risk could be on board by late June and, hopefully, shovels would be in the ground some time in September, Decoteau said.
 
"It's going to delay us getting into the ground until early September, which still works if we can get foundations in the ground and do steel and framing through the winter weather," Decoteau said.
 
A couple of value-engineering changes were discussed specifically at Wednesday's meeting: switching from a metal roof to asphalt shingles and changing the entry way from terrazzo flooring to polished concrete.
 
Prudential Committee members David Moresi, Alex Steele, Lindsay Neathawk and John Notsley participated in the single-item agenda special meeting.

Tags: fire station,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories