Conte/Crosby SOI Greenlit by School Building Needs, School Committee

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The School Building Needs Commission and the School Committee authorized the superintendent to submit a statement of interest for a combined elementary build on the site of Crosby Elementary School.

Now the SOI needs support from the City Council, which will be decided later this month ahead of the April 12 deadline.

The proposal rebuilds Conte Community School and Crosby on the West Street site with shared facilities, as both have outdated facilities, insufficient layouts, and need significant repair. A rough timeline shows a feasibility study in 2026 with design and construction ranging from 2027 to 2029.

Following the SOI, the next step would be a feasibility study to determine the specific needs and parameters of the project, costing about $1.5 million and partially covered by the state.  There is a potential for 80 percent reimbursement through the Massachusetts School Building Association.

The SBNC took the vote on Tuesday and the School Committee on Wednesday — both unanimous.  The City Council is expected to vote on March 26.

After a site visit to both schools, committee members spoke to the risks that Conte’s open space plan poses.

Chair William Cameron pointed out one attendee commenting that there was "No way you could defend a shooter in this building."

"We’re talking about access here, which is obviously very important as a security issue but those schools, given what's happened in the United States since Columbine in 1999, how common this has become, these horrific incidents, those buildings are particularly vulnerable, it seems to me," he said.

"That the students in the classroom or the instructional areas, they're vulnerable in a way that would not be the case in say, Crosby or any of the other elementary schools where you have corridors and classrooms and doors that that shut."

Member William Garrity said an open-space layout is also difficult for students on the autism spectrum.

"I think we really, really, really, really, really need to do something with Conte and Crosby. Just going through I think, from personal experience being on the autism spectrum, the open-concept classroom just sounds ridiculous to me. I know it's really strong language there but just as a person that can get distracted by a lot of noise, I don't think I would ever learn in that environment and there's many, many, many other students like that and I think it's something we need to move past," he said.

"I think open concept classrooms had its moment in the '70s and '80s or whenever it was developed and I think we need to bring back classrooms with four walls and I think this is the way to go forward."

Superintendent Joseph Curtis said veteran teachers who had been incredibly committed to open-space schools chose to move to another district school without the layout because they "wanted a classroom with four walls."


"I started off my career in open space, went to school in open space in Springfield, and I've been a principal in open space," he said. "It does have an impact, there's no question and just some simple thoughts can lead you to that conclusion."

Silvio O. Conte Community School is an open-concept, 69,500-square-foot facility that opened in 1974. Located on West Union Street, it is not far from the proposed site on West Street.

The school was built with no walls separating the classrooms and today, temporary walls that do not reach the ceiling separate the learning areas but allow noise to travel. Originally meant to be an unlocked school that can be accessed by the community, Conte's main office is located on the second floor and is "highly unusual" for modern-day standards that require significant security.

Crosby is about 69,800 square feet and opened in 1962. It was built as a junior high school, so several aspects had to be adapted for elementary use.

"Crosby being a true junior high school and its layout and Conte and Morningside not having walls was an experience for some of the elected officials that took the tour," Curtis told the SBNC.

"There were some there that didn't realize that Conte and Morningside didn’t have walls so it was good to have them in the facilities."

He pointed out that if they were to renovate Crosby, they would still be left with a renovated junior high school rather than an elementary school.

During the tour, Curtis pointed to broken windows that cannot be fixed because the glazing contains asbestos and the higher level layout that separates administrative offices and service provider areas from the classrooms.  

School attendance zones are a point of discussion for the entire school district and for this project.

Currently, eight attendance zones designate where a student will go to elementary school. Part of the vision is to collapse those zones into three with hopes of building a plan that incorporates partner schools in each attendance zone.

The West Side zone can potentially have both partner schools, Crosby and Conte, on the same site.  These partner schools could share several common spaces including the gym, cafeteria library, and potential administrative offices which could result in a reduction in costs for maintenance.

This plan has the potential to house grades pre-kindergarten to first grade in one school and Grades 2 to 4 in another with both having their own identities and administrations.

Curtis pointed to the district restructuring study that is currently underway, explaining that the MSBA will look favorably on the larger efforts.

"It does ask if we have invested in a master facilities plan which we have," he said.

"So that signals to them that it's not simply the superintendent with a desire receives authorization and then just goes to the website and submits the statement. That there is bigger thinking around this investment that has implications beyond the building investment itself."


Tags: school building committee,   school project,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: What's Happening With Dalton's Finances?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

What's the problem? We are approaching our tax levy limit. As a result of rapid increases in spending over the last four years, Dalton's buffer before we reach our tax levy limit has dropped from $1,200,000 to $772,000 in 2023, which is OK, and likely to be approximately $140,000 in 2026, which is very concerning. If it gets to $0, the town of Dalton will have to cut services and reduce spending in many ways.

What is the levy limit? Proposition 2.5, which is part of Massachusetts law, says that the maximum amount a town can tax its residents (the levy limit) is 2.5 percent of the total assessed overall value of the homes in Dalton plus new growth. New growth in this town has been small for several years. In 2024 the total assessed value of all property was $895,322,865 so the total amount the town could raise from taxes is approximately $22.4 million. In 2024 the total amount of revenue collected was $21.2 million, which means we had $864,000 buffer that we could collect before reaching the levy limit. Each year the assessed value of homes increases, which in turn increases the levy limit and helps Dalton meet its ever-increasing obligations. Over the last four years, the increase in our town's expenses has been outpacing these increases, cutting into our buffer.

Does a Proposition 2.5 override save us? A Prop 2.5 override is intended for large capital purchases. It's like a mortgage, but town governments call them bonds. We did overrides for the new school, repairs to Town Hall and Dalton Division Road, which were then covered by bonds. But overrides are not helpful for annual expenses like salaries, benefits, supplies or any other expense. An override may help us not hit our levy limit, but it is still money that must be raised through taxes to pay for the debt, so it still appears in your taxes.

Speaking of taxes, do you know that if this year's proposed budget passes Dalton's resulting rate of approximately $18.13, which combines the town and fire district tax rates, will likely be one of the highest rates in Berkshire County? Do you know that if a new building is built that costs $15 million this would require a Proposition 2.5 override that would result in an average annual increase in our taxes of approximately $250 per household? If this bothers you, when the time comes you should vote!

What can we do?

Attend the annual town meeting on May 5 at 7 p.m. at the Wahconah Regional High School and VOTE. It might be a long evening but your vote on each item is extremely important in controlling costs and increasing the tools our town government has for the future.

To prepare for the meeting every Dalton resident who is concerned about their taxes and their town should read the annual Town Report, which contains all the financial and policy items that you will be asked to vote on at the meeting. The report will be dropped off at your door by the Boy Scouts on Saturday, April 19. If the report is not clear or, like many others, you have questions, I hope you all will feel comfortable stopping by and talking with me about them. Getting ahold of me is easy. I will be at my campaign office in the old bank across from the Town Hall each weekday from 4:30-6:00. I can also be reached on Facebook at William Drosehn Candidate or instant message me.

Please vote yes on Article 27 for the Capital Planning Committee.

Thank you!

William Drosehn

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories