image description
An architect's rendering of plans for a new track and field at Mount Greylock Regional School that is expected to be completed next spring.

At Last: Mount Greylock Field Project on Track

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — After seven years, controversy about the choice of surface, dozens of meetings by several committees and several disappointments from over-budget cost estimates and bids, Mount Greylock Regional School appears to finally be getting a track and multi-sport playing field.
 
By a vote of 5-0, the School Committee on Thursday decided to accept the recommendation of its Field and Track Project Committee to enter negotiations with William. J. Keller and Sons Construction of Castleton on Hudson, N.Y., to build the field and eight-lane track on the west side of the middle-high school campus.
 
"This is really exciting," Carolyn Greene said after the vote in a Zoom meeting. "This is actually going to happen."
 
Greene served on the School Committee back when it was just a district for Grades 7 through 12 and when Williams College in February 2016 gave Mount Greylock a $5 million capital gift at the outset of the district's campaign to build a new middle-high school.
 
Since then, the new Mount Greylock has been built, the Lanesborough and Williamstown school districts merged to create a fully regionalized preK-12 district and the field project has gone through numerous iterations — starting as an artificial turf field that could potentially have a track added and ending as a grass field with a track to support the sport with the highest participation rate at the middle-high school.
 
Technically, the motion passed by the School Committee on Thursday was to negotiate with Keller and, if necessary, move on to the second lowest of three bidders who responded to the district's most recent request for proposals.
 
Both Keller and Troy, N.Y.'s, Rifenburg Contracting came in at or near the figure the Field and Track Project Committee identified as necessary to stay on budget for the project.
 
Assistant Superintendent Joseph Bergeron told the School Committee it was "highly unlikely" that the administration would need to go to the second choice.
 
"If something catastrophic happened and [Keller was] unable to supply the necessary bonds or they turned around said, 'Just kidding,'" Begeron said. "There's nothing left around price or what the project is that is left uncertain here. It's probably just a procedural matter.
 
"But I think it's healthy to declare that we have two bidders who would be within our budget and all three bidders are qualified to do the work."
 
In answer to a question from Steven Miller, Bergeron outlined a few items that the district might choose to put back in the project if funds are available as it develops. Among the items on the wish list: going back to asphalt for walkways that are currently gravel in the project specs and installing a concrete pad that could hold bleachers and, perhaps, a press box at a later date.
 
"We're still a ways away from knowing whether, within the available funding, we'd be able to afford that," Bergeron said. "We're months away from knowing where we are in the construction work.
 
"If we accept this contract and move forward, we should start to have conversations about how we can afford those things, what kind of fund-raising we should do and so on. The point where those things would [be built] is late spring/early summer next year, so we have a little bit of a runway."
 
Greene said Thursday that the district has received some pledges for private contributions toward the project. The main sources of funds are the remaining balance in the Williams College capital gift, $800,000 borrowing authority from the district's member towns of Lanesborough and Williamstown and a $100,000 Community Preservation Act grant from Williamstown.
 
John Benzinger of Skanska USA Building told the School Committee that the contract with Keller could be signed by Monday or Tuesday of next week. Benzinger's colleague Aaron Singer told the panel that he would expect to see Keller's heavy equipment on the campus late next week or "the 13th [of November] would probably be the latest.
 
"They're going to hit the ground running hard and hopefully get a lot of work completed before the winter sets in," Singer said.

Tags: MGRS,   track & field,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories