image description

Pittsfield School Officials OK Paraprofessional Contract

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — An agreement has been reached between the district and unionized paraprofessional workers that ceases the use of a staffing agency to fill vacancies, increases pay, and withdraws litigation.

The School Committee last week approved a settlement agreement with the Pittsfield Federation of School Employees Local 1315 paraprofessional unit. While the vote was taken in open session, it was discussed during executive session.

"Last year, the Pittsfield Public Schools was unable to fill vacancies in some cases for students with special needs or classrooms, serving students with special needs, and in an effort to comply fully with the students' IEPs, the services of an outside agency to provide help for those classrooms was undertaken by the school department," Chair William Cameron said.

"The Federation's paraprofessional unit objected to that as basically subcontracting unit work and filed a prohibited practice charge with the Division of Labor Relations. There were then mediation sessions held between the Pittsfield Public Schools and specifically the negotiations and personnel subcommittee and the Federation and this agreement is an out is the outcome of a number of meetings that took place."

The two primary effects of the agreement are a $1.75 hourly pay increase for all members of the paraprofessional bargaining unit, a revised salary schedule for associate and bachelor's degree employees that is $3.25 greater than the current hourly rate, and an additional 75 cents an hour in the next school year.

It was pointed out that the $3.25 increase is not on top of the $1.75 increase.

The agreement also stipulates that the district will bargain for any future use of a staffing agency to fill bargaining unit positions.

With these changes, the union has agreed to withdraw its unfair labor practice charge against the district over the $1.5 million contract with a private staffing company to fill paraprofessional vacancies.



During hearings for the fiscal 2024 school budget, this was a hot topic.

"We are hopeful that with these revised salary schedules we will be able to attract employees to fill these important legally mandated positions providing services to students with special needs," Cameron said.

During the meeting, it was also announced that the district restructuring survey is being reopened. The School Building Needs Commission reconvened a year ago for a restructuring study of Pittsfield Public School's physical and educational structure.

The first run generated 416 parent and guardian responses, 385 responses from students in Grades 3-12, and 364 responses from teachers.

While reviewing the data, commission members said it was important for people who are not staff, students, parents, or guardians of PPS students and asked if it could be opened to the community.

Superintendent Joseph Curtis reported that a survey was added for residents and businesses.

"It's crucial that people from all backgrounds, all neighborhoods, all walks of life participate to the extent possible in this survey," Cameron said.

"There are major issues confronting the Pittsfield Public Schools looking ahead in future years and we need to hear from people in the city not just from people who work in the school system, although that's certainly important information, but we need to hear from people all over Pittsfield to let us know what they think our school district should look like."

Settlement Agreement Pittsf... by Brittany Polito


Tags: Pittsfield Public Schools,   union contract,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories