image description
A homeowner near Lally Beach is asking for better signage and enforcement at the small town beach on Pontoosuc.

Lanesborough Board Mulling 'Residents Only' Sign at Beach

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Lally Beach lies at the end of a narrow residential street. 

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — A town resident wants signage at the public beach to encourage more orderly usage. 

Michael Lally, who resides on Sunrise Street, said he has taken care of the Pontoosuc Lake beach for years and wants to know why the sign stipulating that it is for town residents only is no more.

The Lanesborough Lally Public Beach is located at the end of Sunrise Street and he's calling for "residents only," "closes at dusk" and "no smoking" signage.

From Lally's observation, about 80 percent of beachgoers are not from Lanesborough.

"Every town has 'Town Residents Only' [at their beach]," he said to the Select Board on Monday.

"We used to have that in Lanesborough also and the sign has disappeared and I want to know why it has disappeared and I want to know what the problem is with having that sign put back up."

While the board members said they heard his frustration, they also want to make sure the signage won't be "toothless."

"Let's do it right because your request is a reasonable one," Select Board member Michael Murphy said, adding that he appreciates all that Lally does and wants to see what can be done to accommodate his request.

Select Board member Timothy Sorrell, the former police chief, could not remember any such a sign being there in his 30 years with the town but was informed that there was one about 15 years ago. He pointed out that the beach just got a "swim at your own risk" sign.

"I think one of our issues is, I feel your pain, we have nobody to enforce 'Lanesborough residents only,'" Sorrell said.

"Plus, right wrong, or indifferent, with all the Airbnbs, we can have somebody saying, 'I'm staying in an Airbnb and they told me that I can use the beach,' so I don't know how we go about doing something like this."

Lally said he would like signage to support police officers' enforcement when they arrive at the beach for undesirables but Murphy said it is up to the police to determine whether people need to leave or not. The board also said it is unfair to imply that "undesirables" are only in other communities, to which Lally agreed.

"A sign with no real authority isn't going to give the Police Department any authority to do anything either," Sorrell said.

Murphy, who grew up in Pittsfield, pointed out that there are no signs limiting the beaches there to residents, and people from surrounding communities are encouraged to use them.

Lally said it is different because Pittsfield is a city and parking is minimal for the town's small beach, which lies in a very residential area.

 "They have adequate parking. We don't have adequate parking," he added. "There's a big difference."



Sorrell thinks that the only enforcement that the town has is parking.

"We can't just kick people off of town property because we want to kick them off. If they're causing a disturbance, they can be asked to leave," he said.

"I think our best thing is to maybe, hate to do it to the people, but have the PD swing by and if their car is illegally parked then we have them ticketed or tell them they've gonna move. I mean, right now that's the only muscle we have to be honest with you."

To the board members' knowledge, there is nothing in the town's bylaws that prohibit non-residents from using the beach.  

They suggested talking to the town counsel to see if this is something that has to be taken to the annual town meeting. If it was a bylaw or an ordinance, it would have some teeth.

The board also has to figure out what board or committee is in charge of the beach.

"I think let's do it right. If that's the request, let's do it right," Sorrell said.

To Lally's request for a "closes at dusk" sign, Sorrell said such signs should be placed in all of the town's parks and recreation spaces. He cited the person who was camping in the Bill Laston Memorial Park.

Lally said he would like to see a "no smoking" sign because he gets wafts of cannabis and cigarette smoke in his windows from the beach. For this, it was recommended that he call the police who can issue a civil citation for cannabis smoking in public.

Murphy clarified that the Select Board is pretty much in agreement with him but want to do it right, directly, and efficiently.

In other news, the Select Board voted to increase the police detail cruiser fees to $50 a day from $25 a day.

Chief Robert Derksen explained that the cruiser rate is an administrative fee for any potential wear and tear on the vehicle and fuel that is used.


Tags: Pontoosuc,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories