Letter: Electronic Voting at Town Meeting

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the editor:

This year, for the first time in Williamstown, we're proposing the town use electronic voting for town meeting.

At the start of the meeting, I will move to use electronic voting (a version of secret ballot) for the first 15 warrant articles. Those warrant articles are financial in nature and traditionally have passed almost unanimously without much debate. We will use those warrant articles to get people comfortable with the operation of the electronic voting devices. (We have some pre-meeting test questions set up for training, too. It's a simple device to use.)

After Article 15, I will move to consider Article 27 out of order to see if town meeting will agree to buy the electronic voting devices. Voting "yes" on Article 27 will signal that town meeting wants the electronic voting devices to be available to be used by town meeting. Voting "no" on Article 27 will signal that town meeting does not want electronic voting devices to be used by town meeting. This is where we will discuss whether we want to keep using the devices.

If we agree to purchase them, I will move to use electronic voting for the remaining articles on the warrant. If that motion carries, we will continue with the warrant and electronic voting. If not, back to voice vote for motions that do not require a two-thirds vote or count.

I'm hopeful everybody will give this system a chance. It is generally a good idea to try something before you decide on it. I'd like us to make the decision based on actual evidence and experience.

There are a couple of reasons why we're trying this system out. Primarily, that it's more democratic and it's more inclusive.

Electronic voting is more democratic because it's more accurate. Think about how we vote now. When you really examine it, there are some inaccurate qualities to it.

Voice Vote: Does a voice vote really capture the quantity of votes or just the volume? Should the louder voice carry more weight than the quieter one?



Standing Vote: While broadly accurate, it is by no means exact. Our counters are only human. Think about it: Try counting bricks in a wall from 20 feet. How accurate can you be?

Electronic voting is more democratic because each person gets one vote with equal weight and we record actual counts of votes for and against.

Electronic voting is more inclusive because voices of the minority are counted and private, which removes the potential for discrimination based on your vote. Imagine you have a different opinion than your employer. Imagine you have a different opinion than your neighbors. Imagine you have a different opinion than the majority of any definition (race, religion, sexual orientation, politics, etc). Voicing your vote in public could make you feel like you're an outsider. In fact, you may feel compelled to vote in a way you don't want to or you may not vote at all. Some people avoid Town Meeting for just this reason. There's a reason we vote in private for all other elections. Your vote is your vote it should not be constrained because you're not in the majority.

As we know, our open town meeting is our local legislature, but with some differences to the more traditional legislature like Congress or the Senate. For those types of legislature, we elect representatives to represent us with their votes. We need to know how they vote to know if they are accurately representing us. We expect them to vote the way we want them to (or the way they said they would) or we vote them out of office. But what about an open town meeting? It is a legislature, but it is different. It is a direct legislative body. Each voter represents themselves. Is anybody saying that we need to know somebody's vote so we could vote them out of town if we disagree with their vote? I would hope not. So, if not to judge, what is the use of the knowing how your neighbor voted? If the information is not going to be used, why gather it? Your vote is your vote and there should be no consequence for voting it.

I believe this will make town meeting more democratic and inclusive. I think this will make town meeting more inviting to people who don't traditionally go. So, please, come to town meeting. Make a comment if you want to or just listen to the debate. Make your decision and cast your vote on the electronic voting device. Your vote is between you and your conscience. Participate publicly but vote privately. What's more democratic than that?

Town meeting is on Tuesday, May 16, at the Mount Greylock Regional School gym. Registration begins at 6 p.m. Town meeting starts at 7 p.m.

I hope to see you there!

Hugh Daley
Chair, Williamstown Select Board

 

 


Tags: town meeting 2023,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories