Pittsfield Homeless Committee Considers Clients' Pets

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — With a new shelter on the horizon, the Homelessness Advisory Committee wants to address the issue of pet ownership in temporary housing.

On Wednesday, the panel decided to create a subcommittee to brainstorm solutions for unhoused residents with furry friends.

"One of the barriers to sheltering folks, not just housing them but even sheltering folks, are pets," Chair Kim Borden said.  
"Sometimes that pet is the one stable piece in their life and for whatever reason, that can be their saving grace, that's their only companionship, but it's a barrier to them being able to go into a shelter."

A majority of apartments for rent in the city do not allow pets.

According to ServiceNet, pets are not allowed a the shelter but service animals are.

ServiceNet's Director of Shelter and Housing Erin Forbush said this has been a part of her outreach in the past and expressed that it would make more sense to have a smaller group work on the topic and bring it back to the full committee.

Director of Community Development Justine Dodds thinks it is a great idea.

"We hear consistently that there's a number of different issues that really stop people from entering shelter and it's usually pets, partners, and property," she said.

"So pets is a big thing and if there was a way to have some creative thinking about how to address that that might be something actionable and small enough that we could get some momentum off."

It was emphasized that this effort is towards pets, as service animals are permissible.

This discussion came after Forbush reported that construction of the First United Methodist emergency shelter on Fenn Street should be completed this month with an anticipated opening in May.

"The long-awaited shelter at the First United Methodist Church should be completed, the construction stuff should be completed by the end of March, this month, and then we have some furniture to buy, stuff to set up," she said.

"And I am looking to maybe a May opening, I'm not giving any specific dates because I've lived this life long enough that dates aren't always held to but that is the plan for the spring."



The shelter has been in the planning process since 2020 when its location was approved. It will replace the current shelter at the former St. Joseph's High School which is operated by ServiceNet.

In the 6,000-square-foot layout, there will be up to 45 beds, meeting rooms, common areas, bathrooms with showers, and access to a fully upgraded commercial kitchen and dining area of approximately 3,000 square feet.

About two years ago, planners hoped to welcome people into the new shelter in April 2021. It was originally aimed to open early that year but regulatory delay and the onslaught of the COVID-19 surge slowed the process.

Last year, $354,500 of American Rescue Plan Act funds were allocated for the shelter. The total cost will be more than $900,000 and is also supported by a $200,000 earmark from the state and a $200,00 contribution from the city through Community Development Block Grants.

In the meantime, the shelter at the former St. Joseph High School will be in operation.  Forbush reported that the facility is currently open 24/7 rather than closing during the day.

"Our numbers are high," she said.

The average census has been about 60 people.

"So it's been a busy winter but it's also been a busy year," Forbush explained.  "Numbers slightly go up in the winter but I'm having similar numbers in nicer weather and that was not the trend in the past. So we're able to manage that. That's going fine. The high school allows us that space."


 


Tags: homeless,   pets,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories