image description
A former gas station will become a Starbucks location on Route 7 after the City Council signed off on revised plans Tuesday.

City Council OKs Starbucks on South Street

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
The new plans show the entrance and exit located in the center of the property's frontage and away from existing curb cuts.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — A proposal for a Starbucks on Route 7 was given the green light after reworking its curb cut to address traffic concerns.

The City Council approved on Tuesday a special permit for the coffee shop and drive-through at 1030 South St. after being continued in October.  

Councilors were concerned about the planned entrance and exit being close to the curb cut for Guido's Fresh Marketplace and the Hilton Garden Inn and urged the applicant to "be a good neighbor" and reconfigure it after hearing from abutters.

Since then, the entrance was moved to the center of the property.

"What we've landed on here is a driveway in the center and we've also added a separate right turn lane and left turn lane," civil engineer Timothy Power explained.

The applicants did look at pushing the curb cut farther away from the concerned businesses but ran into constraints with an existing utility pole and fire hydrant. They also looked into sharing neighbor Jiffy Lube's exit but found that they did not enough legal rights to do so.

Power said the new plan puts the curb cut as far away from the abutting existing lanes as possible and that it provides enough space for traffic flow.

"I think the conflict that we're all really concerned about is someone taking a right, obviously, out of the grocery store and maybe someone taking a left from South Street into the store," he explained.

"I think this gives enough time to see that and react and stop if that's happening for someone leaving the grocery store so we're comfortable with this design, we hope the council sees the benefit of it, and that's where we've landed."

It was passed with three conditions imposed by the Community Development Board: requiring a tracking pad to be installed at the entrance of the project to deter soil migrating offsite during construction, all lighting to be downward cast, and the applicant being subject to all other federal, state, and local laws.

Guido's owner Matthew Masiero reiterated that he is for this project but still has concerns with the revised plan.  


"I would be remiss if I didn't bring this up for the safety of my staff, my customers, their customers," he said.

While Masiero appreciates the new design, he said it only gives 60 feet of distance between the curb cuts and that the speed of the road is a problem.

"It's posted at 45 miles per hour, people travel at 55 or even faster," he explained.

Power thinks that the road, which sees 20,000 to 30,00 trips per day, is the problem and not the proposed Starbucks.

Councilors supported adding a new business to the city but agreed that speeding in that corridor needs to be addressed. 

Because it is a state-owned road, the city does not have control over it but suggested increased patrols and advocacy for larger traffic-calming measures.

"It seems like the main concern is people not driving well," Councilor at Large Peter White said. "I drive down there occasionally and I see way too much speeding."

Ward 3 Councilor Kevin Sherman would not have supported the original proposal but feels this one is better.

He recognized that the whole drag can be a "free for all NASCAR pit stop."

"We've got work to do and it's not just that corridor," Sherman said. "And I would say 90 percent of my calls are about speeding or reckless driving throughout the city of Pittsfield."


Tags: coffeeshop,   special permit,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories