image description
Williamstown Prudential Committee members, from left, Joseph Beverly, David Moresi and Lindsay Neathawk participate in Wednesday's meeting.

Williamstown Fire District Sets February Date for Station Vote

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Fire District officials Wednesday decided to reschedule to Feb. 28 a special district meeting to approve a bond to construct a new fire station.
 
The district had hoped to put the question to voters in December but last month walked back that idea in hopes that it will have more concrete numbers to put before voters.
 
Prudential Committee Chair David Moresi, who also serves on the district's Building Committee, told his Prudential Committee colleagues that earlier on Wednesday the Building Committee voted unanimously to recommend holding the vote on Tuesday, Feb. 28, at 7 p.m.
 
"The thought is that by the end of January we should have a good sense of, potentially, some of updated financials pertaining to some contributions or what may come from some gifts or what have you," Moresi said.
 
Moresi said the Building Committee was looking for a date when it would have more information, maximize potential turnout and, if the vote is successful, move the project forward as quickly as possible.
 
"I think it's a good date," Prudential Committee member Lindsay Neathawk said. "It's the week after [K-12] school break, so people should be back in town, and it's before the college's spring break. I think it's a perfect time."
 
Alex Steele said the committee may want to consider providing child care for voters with small children. Neathawk said the likely site of the meeting, Williamstown Elementary School, would lend itself to that amenity.
 
District Moderator Paul Harsch asked whether the Prudential Committee could designate a snow date for the meeting in light of the late February date. Prudential Committee John Notsley said that in the event of severe weather, the special district meeting could be adjourned to date certain, as the town did last spring with the annual town meeting.
 
The Fire District is a separate municipal entity apart from town government with its own taxing authority. Its annual budget and, in this case, bonding capability are subject to the approval of residents who attend district meetings.
 
Generally, the district holds one annual meeting in the spring. The last special district meeting occurred in 2017, when attendees OK'd the purchase of the Main Street parcel where officials hope to build the new station.
 
The district is led by the five-person Prudential Committee, which functions in many ways like the Select Board at the town level but with more control of the district's day-to-day finances.
 
Wednesday's Prudential Committee meeting was the first with the district's newly hired treasurer, Billie Jo Sawyer.
 
In addition to the regular review of the district's financial position and approval of monthly expenditures, most of Wednesday's meeting focused on the building project.
 
Bruce Decoteau, a project coordinator hired by the Prudential Committee to advise the panel, informed the members that progress was being made on a final contract with district owner's project manager Colliers International and that the district late Wednesday received geotechnical reports on the 3.7-acre Main Street site.
 
Previously, the district's architects advised that it was waiting on that geotechnical data to make a more definitive cost estimate for the project.
 
Construction costs alone for the new 27,500 square foot station are projected to be in the neighborhood of $18 million but could more likely be more than $20 million once "soft costs" are added.
 
The Prudential Committee also voted to accept the Building Committee's unanimous recommendation to purchasing photovoltaic equipment in that estimate.
 
Moresi said the district had the option of either owning its solar panels or leasing them, but the Building Committee believed the return on investment of ownership made it a smarter financial decision.
 
The Prudential Committee agreed and voted 4-0-1 to buy, rather than lease, the panels. Steele abstained from the vote, explaining that he thought the committee needed more data before making the decision.

Tags: fire station,   prudential committee,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories