AGO Finds Williamstown Select Board Violated Open Meeting Law

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Attorney General's Office has determined the Select Board violated the Open Meeting Law by holding a "serial communication" regarding the employment status of the then-interim town manager.
 
The violation was found by the AGO during its review of emails submitted by the town in response to a different but related OML complaint.
 
Resident Janice Loux filed an April 20 complaint against the board, alleging that it violated the law when a quorum of board members discussed with interim Town Manager Charlie Blanchard the employment status of interim Police Chief Mike Ziemba.
 
In a letter to the town counsel dated Aug. 19, Assistant Attorney General Carrie Benedon writes that the Select Board did not violate the Open Meeting Law in the police chief discussion because the authority to hire a chief rested entirely with the town manager, per the town charter.
 
"A discussion is outside a body's jurisdiction where it concerns a decision over which the body has no authority," Benedon wrote. "Public bodies do not violate the Open Meeting Law when they advise an official on a decision that the official has sole authority to make outside of the public body's jurisdiction.
 
"We note that the [Select] Board did not, for example, merely delegate its own authority to appoint a Police Chief to the Town Manager. Rather, the Charter vests the full authority to appoint a Police Chief with the Town Manager, and by extension, the Temporary Town Manager, who 'perform[s] the duties of the office.' "
 
According to Loux's complaint, she learned of the discussion about the police chief through a public records request dated Feb. 16.
 
That request yielded a chain of emails between Oct. 31 and Nov. 21 that indicated all five members of the board responded (either by email or in person) to Blanchard's Oct. 31 request for feedback on his intention to offer Ziemba a three-year contract to serve as chief.
 
On Nov. 22, the Select Board extended Blanchard's employment agreement with the town and included language stating that the, " 'Interim Town Manager agrees not to appoint a police chief except upon 14 days advance written notice to the Select Board of his intent to appoint a specific named individual, which appointment shall not be effective until the expiration of such 14-day period,' " according to Benedon's letter.
 
The Attorney General's Office determined that emails on Nov. 21 between Andrew Hogeland, Hugh Daley and Wade Hasty and on Nov. 22 between Hogeland and Jeffrey Johnson show the board members discussed the extension to Blanchard's employment agreement outside of a posted meeting, as required by the OML.
 
"While we find that the Board did not violate the Open Meeting Law with respect to its discussion of hiring a permanent police chief as that topic was not within the Board’s jurisdiction, we caution the Board that various other elements of its discussion fell within its jurisdiction," Benedon's letter reads.
 
According to the Aug. 19 letter, the Select Board acknowledged there is "room for the perception that a quorum of the Board engaged in an email 'deliberation,' " but the board argued that any violation was cured by the disclosure of the offending emails to Loux and the AGO.
 
"We find that disclosing the emails to one community member and our office is insufficient to inform the public of the discussions regarding the extension of Mr. Blanchard’s employment agreement," the letter reads. "We order the Board to make the emails available to the public, either by reading them aloud at an open meeting, or by attaching the emails to the minutes of an open meeting."

Williamstown Select Board OML Violation by iBerkshires.com on Scribd


Tags: open meeting complaint,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown CPA Requests Come in Well Above Available Funds

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Community Preservation Committee faces nearly $300,000 in funding requests for fiscal year 2026.
 
Problem is, the town only anticipates having about $200,000 worth of funds available.
 
Seven non-profits have submitted eight applications totaling $293,797 for FY26. A spreadsheet detailing both FY26 revenue and known expenses already earmarked from Community Preservation Act revenues shows the town will have $202,535 in "unrestricted balance available" for the year that begins on July 1.
 
Ultimately, the annual town meeting in May will decide whether to allocate any of that $202,535.
 
Starting on Wednesday, the CPC will begin hearing from applicants to begin a process by which the committee drafts warrant articles recommending the May meeting approve any of the funding requests.
 
Part of that process will include how to address the $91,262 gap between funds available and funds requested. In the past, the committee has worked with applicants to either scale back or delay requests to another year. Ultimately, it will be the panel's job to send the meeting articles that reflect the fiscal reality.
 
The individual requests range from a high of $100,000 from the trustees of the town's Affordable Housing Trust to a low of $8,000 from the Williamstown Historical Museum.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories