Williamstown Select Board Finalizes Charge for Charter Review Panel

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Select Board on Monday approved the marching orders for the first comprehensive charter in more than six decades.
 
It also sought to temper expectations about the scope of the Charter Review Committee that the board hopes to appoint next month.
 
"This is not just the charter," said Andy Hogeland, who drafted the charge with Jeffrey Johnson. "This is the state laws and bylaws that affect the structure of town government – so not a substantive thing but a mechanical, structural review is our focus.
 
"We added in here a couple of sentences that this review is not about non-structural things. This is not about diversity, equity, sustainability. Those are legitimate things. If they come into this committee, we're going to refer them out to committees where they more properly should be looked at like the Comprehensive Plan Committee or DIRE or the Affordable Housing Trust or the Planning Board. I think it will be easy to be distracted by having way too many social issues come up, and this really isn't designed to handle those.
 
"This is more about, ‘If you have an issue, how would you go about deciding it?' rather than deciding it."
 
The charge approved unanimously on Monday night calls on the committee to discuss "how well the structures of government are working and identify options for modifying the structure that might improve the functions of government."
 
Among the topics suggested for discussion by the Charter Review Committee: whether Williamstown should consider a representative town meeting form of government instead of its current open town meeting format; how authority is divided between the Select Board and town manager; and whether the charter should allow for recalls and/or referendums.
 
Hogeland and Johnson have agreed to serve on the review committee, and the Select Board is seeking five more members of the community to make a seven-person body. Hogeland Monday reiterated that the board wants applications or nominations to serve on the committee submitted to Town Manager Robert Menicocci by Monday, Aug. 15.
 
The charge calls on the review committee to compile a draft report by January 2024 with the possibility of any changes to the charter to be sent to town meeting that May.
 
What that town meeting might look like is a question for a different Select Board initiative.
 
On Monday, Randal Fippinger updated his colleagues on his efforts to review the operation of the town meeting to see how the current open meeting format can better serve residents.
 
Fippinger said he has been engaging newly elected Moderator Elisabeth Goodman and that he plans to get input from past moderators and the town clerk before eventually holding a public hearing to see what if any changes have buy-in from the community at large.
 
Among the possible changes Fippinger mentioned on Monday are breaking the annual meeting into two different sessions to prevent marathon meetings like June's, when complex zoning bylaw amendments were taken up relatively late when some meeting members may not have been able to fully engage, using electronic voting devices (clickers) to tally votes in order to both speed the process and allow members a measure of anonymity and providing child-care for residents with young children who want to participate.
 
Fippinger noted that one issue with the "multiple meetings" solution is the cost to set up for the event in either Williamstown Elementary School's gymnasium (its traditional location) or Mount Greylock Regional School's gym, where the 2022 meeting took place. He said he and Goodman are exploring other potential locations, specifically noting Mount Greylock's auditorium.
 
The auditorium has a capacity of 445 people. The WES gym's capacity is 800 people; Mount Greylock's gym has a capacity of 1,500. At June's meeting, 327 of the town's 4,906 registered voters checked in.
 
The Select Board made quick work of a relatively light agenda. It approved Mendicocci's appointment of Barbara Robertson to fill a vacant seat on the Conservation Commission and OK'd the 14th running of the annual Williamstown Community Chest 5K Fun Run and 1-mile Walk on Sept. 17 at 8:30 a.m.
 
And the board discussed its continuing effort to assess the role of the Diversity, Inclusion and Racial Equity Committee the board created in 2020.
 
Fippinger, who occupies the Select Board's seat on the DIRE Committee, reported some of the responses he received from community members during a listening session at Saturday's grand opening celebration of the Chef's Hat restaurant on Simonds Road.
 
"We had a lot of feedback that some people said they liked the smaller Dire Committee because it felt more intimate and could get more work done," Fippinger said. "A lot of people appreciated being able to see both DIRE and the Select Board at sessions like the Chef's Hat and the [Aug. 2] National Night Out event. They encouraged both committees to do more of that."
 
Fippinger reported that the current members of the DIRE Committee were interested in seeing the Select Board appoint new members to the diversity panel and noted that it could not hold its planned Aug. 1 session due to the lack of available members to form a quorum.
 
The Select Board has expressed a hesitancy about making new appointments before a review of the committee's purpose and process is completed.
 
Select Board Chair Hugh Daley, who has been leading the board's efforts to review the DIRE Committee's charge, said he understood that the panel's current members might feel in limbo while the process plays out.
 
"I think we need to talk about coming up with the beginnings of a draft purpose document to start giving us something to talk about," Daley said. "In order to bring this to a conclusion, we do have to actually commit to a charge. Odds are it has some new language in it."
 
Daley and Johnson were tasked with developing a draft for the DIRE Committee's charge along with members of the latter committee.

Tags: charter review,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories