image description

Consultant Recommends Williamstown Create HR Department

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Town Hall needs to do a better job recruiting a diverse workforce and to update policies on harassment, discrimination and disciplinary actions, according to a human resources audit commissioned by the Select Board last year.
 
The board Monday reviewed recommendations from Andover-based Human Resources Services Inc.
 
Although the top line of audit's executive summary reads, "Town has a good grasp of human resources, overall," that summary also specifies a number of areas where the town's policies and procedures for personnel management could be improved.
 
The first recommendation on the list: create an HR department.
 
"Additional staffing and resources in human resources is needed to properly execute the provision of human resource management that is needed in Williamstown and to ensure compliance with state and federal laws," the summary reads.
 
The audit is one of several steps the Select Board pledged in late August in the immediate aftermath of news the town was being sued for violation of whistle-blower protection laws by a member of the Williamstown Police Department. The lawsuit since has been dropped, but the allegations it raised generated anger and fear among many town residents and became a focal point for conversations about inclusion and institutional racism in the town of 7,700.
 
The three-page executive summary lists a number of concrete steps the town should take to promote diversity in its staff.
 
"Train recruiters, staff and appointing authorities," the report reads. "Examine town advertisements. Review job requirements. Evaluate recruitment media. Use resource links. Examine workplace culture. Partner with outside groups, community organizations, etc."
 
It also includes recommendations for how better to manage the town's workforce, which includes the WPD, Department of Public Works and Town Hall staff.
 
"[Policy] areas that needed significant improvement included harassment, discrimination, social media, COVID, investigation, disciplinary action," the summary reads.
 
In addition to the executive summary, HRS provided draft revisions of the town's human resources policies to bring them up to date. Select Board Chair Andrew Hogeland said Monday that he hoped the review of those draft policies can include members of the town's Diversity, Inclusion and Racial Equity Committee, which called for the HR policy review on Aug. 17, 2020.
 
"We're looking forward to reviewing these, working with DIRE on it and bringing them to the board for final adoption, hopefully, sometime next month," interim Town Manager Charles Blanchard told the Select Board.
 
Jeffrey Johnson, who occupies the Select Board's seat on the DIRE Committee, told his colleagues Monday that the diversity group is actively seeking replacements for members who have decided not to continue on the panel after their first terms expire on June 30.
 
Johnson said he was glad to receive a copy of the list of residents who applied to serve on DIRE at its inception last year, but the search for new members will not be restricted to that list.
 
"Anybody who wants to serve on DIRE should contact any of us," Hogeland said.
 
Hogeland repeatedly Monday encouraged residents to reach out to members of the Select Board between meetings with their concerns about town government, twice mentioning that he is available to chat most Saturday mornings at the town's weekly farmer's market on Spring Street.
 
As for formal communication during the board's twice-monthly meetings, Hogeland, who just began his second term as board chair, tried out a new strategy on Monday: designating two public comment periods — one at the start of the meeting to address specific items on the agenda and one at the end for general comments unrelated to specific business before the board.
 
No one took advantage of the former on Monday. During the latter, Arlene Kirsch questioned the wisdom of limiting public participation on agenda items to the beginning of the meeting.
 
"My suggestion about public comments is that they be allowed during an agenda item," Kirsch said. "If we don't know what you're going to say, it will be hard, at the beginning of the meeting, to address that. I think the most efficient use of public comment for you all is for us to be able to comment at the point of an agenda item before you vote."
 
Hogeland pointed out that what Hirsch was suggesting approximates how the board operated before the advent of virtual meetings last year. It was easier when everyone was in the same room to know who wanted to speak on which topics, he said.
 
On a related note, Monday's meeting marked likely the final time the Select Board will meet in an entirely virtual setting for the foreseeable future.
 
Gov. Charlie Baker's executive order suspending certain provisions of the Open Meeting Law due to the COVID-19 pandemic was set to expire on Tuesday. One of the provisions of the OML that Baker suspended specifies that while public officials may participate in meetings remotely, a quorum of any board or committee's membership must meet in person.
 
Currently, there is legislation on Beacon Hill that would extend a number of pandemic-related provisions, including the "physical quorum" provision of the OML.
 
The Select Board plans to meet June 28 at Town Hall. Hogeland Monday said he hopes at some point to be able to hold "hybrid" meetings that incorporate the technology used over the last 15 months with a traditional in-person meeting format.
 
"I think having Zoom capability made a huge difference in public participation even before the [August release of the lawsuit]," Hogeland said. "I personally would like to continue that. I don't understand the technology, but apparently we don't have the equipment yet, which would let you have an in-person meeting and simultaneous broadcasting and Zoom functionality all at the same time. There's hardware and software that lets you do that. There will be a lag in getting that up to date.
 
"For me, the goal is to get to Zoom participation from home, two-way conversation from home, but there will be some sort of pause before that's actually put in place."
 
In other business Monday, the board heard a report from members Hugh Daley and Jane Patton, who are serving on the Town Manager Search Committee. Daley said the town is a little behind its original schedule for posting the position but hopes to advertise for applicants by the middle of July.
 
Patton said the search committee is welcoming comments from residents with suggestions for the job description through a dedicated email address, tmsearch@williamstownma.gov.

Tags: personnel,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories