image description
The Health Department has come up with a plan to address health questions regarding the South Street cell tower.

Pittsfield Residents, Officials Frustrated With Cell Tower Action Plan

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Residents, City Council members, and health officials are frustrated with the unfolding situation concerning a Verizon cell tower at 877 South St.

The tower was erected in August 2020 and has since driven large amounts of public comment in the open microphone segment of City Council meetings.  

Alma Street resident Courtney Gilardi has been the primary spokesperson for the cell tower opposition and has had her 12-year-old daughter Amelia call into the meetings to speak about the symptoms she is experiencing such as nausea and sleep disturbances.

At Tuesday's City Council meeting, Health Director Gina Armstrong presented an official four-step alternative plan to address these concerns without the help of the state Department of Public Health, which offered the services of a Bureau of Environmental Health representative and then backed out.  

Wednesday night at the Board of Health meeting, Armstrong expressed that the Health Department was "disappointed" with DPH's lack of participation in the investigation after offering to help.

The action plan that was unanimously approved by the Board of Health on Monday includes:

  • A panel presentation on EMF safety from a "range of views" for the next Board of Health meeting in June;
  • compiling a summary of health concerns reported to the Health Department to include with a letter to the legislative delegation, the governor's office and DPH in support of Senate Bill 2418 to form a special commission to research the impact of EMR and RFR on consumer protection, public health, and technology in the commonwealth;
  • obtaining an engineering consultant to measure the radio frequency power transmitted from the cell tower and evaluate compliance with Federal Communications Commission radiation limits;
  • researching resources for conducting an epidemiological study of the health concerns reported from residents in this neighborhood.

"Board members and I reviewed the email communications from residents and EMF experts, the Nov[ember] 2020 New Hampshire legislature's Final 5G Investigation Commission Report and other resource material; consulted with the City Solicitor as well as Dr. Alan Woolf of Boston Children's Hospital as recommended by MDPH," Armstrong wrote in a communication to the council.

Ward 4 Councilor Chris Connell feels that, in his experience as a councilor, he has "never had to go through this much to try and get a response back from any department." Connell originally submitted a petition to investigate the cell tower concerns with Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey on Jan. 20.


"So is this a failing of the Health Department? Is this a failing of the administration? I don't know, but we're all here to serve the residents and, in my opinion, that hasn't been done," he said. "This is a situation to be taken seriously, many months ago, and actually should have been taken seriously. Why now? Because the media has played a part in this? Maybe, but I think it's disrespectful to the people we're supposed to represent."

Kavey queried Armstrong on the timeline for the action plan. She said the priority is to retain the engineering consultant to measure the radio frequency power transmitted from the cell tower.

The Health Department feels that these measurements need to be taken immediately so that any non-compliance in RF emissions can be fixed.

Next week, Armstrong's team will then be working on the letter to the legislative delegation and sending the summary of health concerns and will be working toward the panel presentation.

A Pittsfield resident who has been following this story in the media called in to voice her opposition to this plan as a whole.

"It seems in general, 'we have to research it, we have to come up with a plan, it has to be a rigorous study before they can do anything, now, maybe let's hire an engineer to check the radiation of the tower and see if it's in code' and I asked myself: 'so if it's too high, Pittsfield's going to ask them to down the power, if it's too low, let's crank it up, if it's just right, let's forget the whole thing? I don't understand the purpose of going down the road," Ann Carey of Oliver Drive said.

"And until you can figure out how to do it, simply unplug it, turn their power off, the only moral thing to do until you can assure that it's safe, that's my plea that you have a heart and you do the right thing."


Tags: cell tower,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories