image description

Mount Greylock School Committee to Hear Proposal for Fields Advisory Group

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Mount Greylock Regional School Committee's Finance Subcommittee on Thursday settled on a proposal for an advisory group to help the full committee make a decision that has stymied it for months.
 
Following a request from School Committee Chair Christina Conry, the subcommittee crafted a proposal to bring to the full panel as soon as its Thursday, June 25, meeting.
 
The proposed Athletic Infrastructure Advisory Group would be charged with delivering and providing background to the School Committee two or three options "for resolving current challenges to athletic infrastructure" at the middle/high school. The proposal as drafted gives the advisory panel a deadline of mid-October to deliver its report.
 
That time frame coincides with the date the School Committee expects to learn the value of funds donated to the district by Williams College and held in the college's endowment, which is valued annually with a fiscal year that ends on June 30.
 
"The idea of the committee is to be a research group and not to make a recommendation," said Carolyn Greene, who volunteered to chair the advisory group. "We are giving the pros and cons, and then it's up to the School Committee to decide what to do."
 
Greene said the goal is not for the advisory group to duplicate the efforts of the former Phase 2 Subcommittee, which last year produced a comprehensive plan that included a new artificial turf playing field. The district put that plan out to bid, but the project failed to move forward after the low bid came in with a price tag of $2.85 million.
 
"This is the third committee to look at this issue — maybe the fourth — and the importance of wrapping this up by October is not to be overlooked," Greene said.
 
Since the Phase 2 Subcommittee's proposal came back with bids significantly higher than expected in September 2019, the landscape has changed on a number of fronts: The School Committee has moved forward with another project funded by the Williams College gift; the economy was slammed by the COVID-19 pandemic, adding uncertainty to the value of the endowment-based gift; School Committee members who have been the strongest proponents of an artificial turf field have committed to including a specification for organic (but more expensive) Brockfill as infill instead of crumb rubber in a future bid package; and elected and appointed officials in both the school district's member towns have advised the School Committee not to make any other large allocations from the gift.
 
Much of the conversation in Thursday's Finance Subcommittee meeting dealt with the composition of the proposed committee. Greene told the group she already has reached out to several prospective members from the broader community, and the committee members agreed that, as with the Phase 2 Subcommittee, students from the high school should be included on the advisory group.
 
That Phase 2 group also included members of the Mount Greylock faculty. Superintendent Kimberley Grady said she would pass along a message to staff asking if anyone wanted to participate on the advisory group but stressed that their participation would be voluntary on a panel whose work would commence in July, during the school's summer vacation.
 
Greene recommended herself to chair the advisory group and already started doing some of the leg work for the panel, compiling an 11-page spreadsheet that attempts to track all of the questions that have been asked about the field project by members of the public and the School Committee itself — and, where possible, documents the answers that already have been provided by the Phase 2 Subcommittee and/or its consultants.
 
One item left unresolved at Thursday's Finance Subcommittee meeting is whether the advisory group it is proposing would have additional access to paid consultants in order to help fill in any blanks.
 
Grady said she would inquire how much it would cost the district to ask some follow up questions of Traverse Landscape Architects, who did the design work for the Phase 2 Subcommittee's proposal.
 
"Whatever we spend is going to eat away at the Williams gift," Greene said. "That's something to keep in mind."

Tags: MGRS,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories