Election 2009: Bianchi Would Convene Education Forum

Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Mayoral candidate Dan Bianchi announced Thursday that as part of his vision for improving education in Pittsfield, he will host an education forum within the first 100 days of being elected. 

Bianchi will invite members of the school administration and School Committee, faculty and parent representatives, along with Department of Education officials and Mass School Building Needs Commission to participate. The forum will serve as a venue to talk about the priorities for improving the Pittsfield Public Schools, including what is working and an in depth discussion about renovating school buildings coupled with a detailed discussion about how MCAS and other factors are affecting student performance.

Bianchi said student academic performance, including how students do on MCAS tests and whether the school is meeting AYP, is affected by two broad sets of influences: school factors and non-school factors. The first entails what happens in school, and thus what is within the control of the school district itself. The second entails conditions outside the schools, such as the demographic profile of the students and the community, and infrastructure needs at our schools.

"Throughout this campaign, I have been talking to residents about their concerns regarding school choice and how that impacts a classroom, a school and a neighborhood; the lack of supplies, technology and textbooks available to students; and the pressures that we are placing on faculty and students in third grade and above as they prepare for MCAS," Bianchi said.

"Residents of Pittsfield have real concerns and I want to bring all parties to the table to talk about these very important issues and how they are related to one another. We need to determine whether there is a direct correlation between the three Pittsfield elementary schools which were not put on the building needs agenda and their failure to meet AYP this year. An education forum, as I am suggesting, will give us an opportunity to increase awareness and develop a meaningful program and list of priorities that will benefit school age children from the very beginning of their education, where learning begins," Bianchi added.

"It is no secret that the MCAS has been the subject of much controversy in Mass. For the first time since testing began, more than half of Massachusetts schools are out of compliance with federal achievement standards, a finding that raises warning flags for local educators but also sparks questions about whether the national benchmarks are inappropriate. MCAS are on the minds of many school age children and their families and we need to work with parents to make them part of the process," he said.

"Teachers have stepped up and gone above and beyond in Pittsfield, which is why MCAS scores have gone up and school drop-out rates have gone down. My opponent's claim that he has had something to do with both of these important successes is unfair and misguided," added Bianchi.

"From the very beginning, I was in favor of renovating our two existing high schools, unlike my opponent who has used the office of mayor to move the one 'mega high school' project to the front burner despite the Mass State Building Commissions recommendation that state funding for such a 'giant' would not be available. This is another example of the mayor being out of touch with the residents."
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories