Final Ruberto, Bianchi Debate Moved to Friday

Staff reportsiBerkshires
Print Story | Email Story
Daniel L. Bianchi James M. Ruberto
Update: Changed again!! Now the debate will take place in Berkshire Community College's K-111 theater at 5 p.m.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The final mayoral debate will go on — but not without some sniping between the Bianchi and Berkshire Chamber camps.

The debate between incumbent James M. Ruberto and challenger Daniel L. Bianchi has been changed to Friday, Oct. 30, at 5 p.m. at the Pittsfield Community Television studios. It is being sponsored by the Berkshire Chamber of Commerce and "Talk Berkshires" on WBRK with support from Berkshire Money Management.

The forum on business-related topics was to be held Wednesday at 6 p.m. at the Crowne Plaza and telecast live on PCTV before an audience.

Bianchi, however, declined to participate on Tuesday, citing a previous engagement. He accused the chamber of refusing to consider other dates; chamber officials responded that over the several weeks since the debate's announcement, they had offered different times and believed the Bianchi campaign had been working to clear his schedule.

In a statement, Bianchi blasted the chamber for showing "no flexibility" in changing the date, saying his campaign had invited the Berkshire Chamber to participate in an Oct. 13 debate on WBRK.

"When my campaign informed the chamber of my schedule, the Chamber and Sherman Baldwin of WBRK said that they could not switch the date because of scheduling with PCTV," wrote Bianchi. "I received confirmation from PCTV last evening that they were never contacted with any alternative dates to switch the Chamber debate even though these dates were presented to the Chamber a month in advance. I think this purposeful attempt to mislead the citizens of Pittsfield is inexcusable and I suggest the mayor debates me this Friday."


Chamber officials said they had not had a "clear message from the Bianchi campaign" until Tuesday, when he formally declined to attend.

"We had hoped for a large debate with a strong public showing in the audience but believe, regardless of time or location, it is critical that the issues of the business community in Pittsfield are debated," said Michael Supranowicz, president and CEO of the Berkshire Chamber. "While this date change is not convenient for the chamber as we already have an event planned for Friday evening, we also recognize that the voters in Pittsfield must have the opportunity to hear each candidate's perspective on a variety of issues so that they can make the most informed choice on Nov. 3."

Ruberto had agreed to appear at Wednesday's debate with or without Bianchi and confirmed he'd be at Friday's. "We appreciate the mayor's willingness to rearrange his busy schedule and we share his disappointment that the format has been changed to 60 minutes and will not open to the public," wrote Supranowicz.

This debate will be the last of five Pittsfield mayoral debates. The candidates will also meet on Thursday morning at 11:04 on the radio talk show "Up-Front" on WBEC 1420-AM with Larry Kratka.

Friday's debate will be a half-hour shorter than planned, at one hour. The format will not change: The candidates will take turns answering questions and given 2 minutes to answer, followed by a 1-minute rebuttal by the opposing candidate, and a 30-second response to the rebuttal. Each will have a 2-minute opening statement and a 3-minute closing statement.

In addition to being telecast live from 5 to 6 on PCTV Channel 18, the debate will be aired live on "Talk Berkshires" on 1340-AM and 101.7-FM. The moderator is Tammy Daniels, managing editor of iBerkshires.com.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories