It was a good week in the equity market. The bounce back from the 8 percent sell-off at the beginning of the month is but a distant memory. Does that mean we are in the clear for further gains?

 

Maybe. So far, the financial markets have seen a "V" shaped recovery from the lows of Monday a week past. Technically, that is a rare occurrence after a downdraft of that magnitude. And yet, that is exactly what has happened thus far.

 

The gains have been helped by a spate of good corporate earnings, with 80 percent of S&P 500 companies beating estimates. A few benign macroeconomic readings suggested continued economic growth, a lessening of inflation, and a still strong if moderating, labor market. What's not to like about that?

 

It appears the yen-carry trade has been relegated to the back burner. Japanese stocks have recovered most of their losses and the yen has weakened versus the dollar every day this week.

 

On the geopolitical front, the awaited response to Israel's assassinations of several Middle Eastern terrorist chieftains has not materialized. Iran appears to have telegraphed that while it is still considering a response, much will depend on whether a Gaza cease-fire agreement can be hammered out by the combatants.

 

Both the Producer Price Index and the Consumer Price Index for July came in on target or even a little cooler depending on how you parse the numbers. July retail sales were a big surprise rising 0.4 percent, double the consensus of a 0.2 percent increase. That put to bed worries over faltering consumer spending.

 

And once again this week, unemployment claims came in less than expected at 227,000, down from the 234,000 the week prior. Given the data, economists are now calling the disappointing non-farm payroll number of two weeks ago an anomaly possibly caused by fallout from Hurricane Beryl.

 

There is also a bit of excitement and consternation surrounding the election campaigns of both candidates. This is the season of promises where politicians dangle new and tasty carrots before the electorate. Donald Trump has floated the idea of making social security benefits tax-free while arguing that he should have more control over central bank decisions.

 

Kamala Harris unveiled her economic policy initiative on Friday. She is promising to slap price controls and other penalties on price gouging in the grocery industry and make it harder for food producers to acquire distribution businesses like supermarkets and grocery stores. 

 

She also wants to cut taxes for the middle class and expand affordable housing. Both candidates are now talking about making tip income tax-free as well. In the meantime, government Medicare officials have also negotiated lower prices for 10 drugs including some in cancer, blood clots, and diabetes areas for the first time. It may represent a turning point to rein in healthcare costs and could save billions of dollars a year in Medicare payments. Harris is promising to expand this effort in the years to come.

 

On Aug. 22, the yearly Economic Policy Symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyo., will kick off. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell will speak next Friday. Investors will be sure to parse every word of his speech to get his latest thoughts on the interest rate front.

 

Marketwise, we have officially recouped all the downside which occurred at the beginning of the month. Staying invested and/or buying the dip proved to be the right thing to do. There may be more volatility ahead since August into September is seasonally the worst period for the markets. My advice is to keep your eyes on the long term, which seems to be fairly rosy.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

"Be careful what you wish for" is an often-used quote. In the case of the financial markets, all year long, traders and the Fed wished for a slower economy, less employment, and therefore a decline in inflation. Now that we have it, the markets don't like it.

 

Earlier in the week, the bulls could not have asked for a more dovish Federal Open Market Committee meeting. While the central bank maintained its higher-for-longer stance, it hinted that September could see the first of several interest rate cuts. Jerome Powell, the chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank, said it will depend on economic data over the next several weeks. "If that test is met, a reduction in our policy rate could be on the table as soon as the next meeting in September."

 

But it would not only be the inflation data that the Fed would be eyeing. The Fed has now shifted to a more balanced approach between maintaining employment and reducing inflation. Powell admitted that at this point cutting interest rates "too late or too little could unduly weaken economic activity and employment."

 

In the meantime, other central banks have already cut interest rates. The Bank of England was the latest bank to reduce their interest rates on Thursday. Both traders and the Fed, have been watching the labor market for clues to the health of the economy.

 

As Powell explained in the FOMC Q&A session on Wednesday, "I don't think of the labor market in its current state as a likely source of significant inflationary pressures. So, I would not like to see material further cooling in the labor market." However, that is exactly what occurred one day after that meeting.

 

On Thursday, last week's report on jobless claims rose to an 11-month high with unemployment benefits filings hitting 249,000, up from 236,000 last week. Those numbers are still small compared to the overall number of employed in the nation, but the trend is not your friend if you are worried about a softening labor market and a hard landing for the economy.

 

It didn't help that on the same day the deteriorating health of the manufacturing sector came under the spotlight. Manufacturing has been weak for months. The sector has been below 50 on the ISM Manufacturing PMI, which is the cut-off between a weakening sector and one that is healthy. The ISM Manufacturing PMI for July showed a decrease to 46.8 versus 48.8 expected. The market interpreted that data point as a sure sign of a weakening economy.

 

Coupled with the jobless claims data and the ISM numbers, Friday's non-farm payroll data was also a disappointment. Job gains registered a mere 114,000, which was below the consensus of 175,000 expected. The unemployment rate also spiked higher to 4.3 percent from 4.1 percent in June. Wage growth also slowed to 3.6 percent from 3.9 percent year-over-year.

 

Suddenly, in the space of three days, the mood of the markets swung from Wednesday's "The Fed has it covered" with their wait-and-see data stance, to the "Fed has waited too long to cut."

 

Fed critics have argued for some time that when you begin to see the labor market roll over, it is already too late to avoid a sharp decline in economic activity. Many economists agree with the Sahm Rule, named after a former Fed economist, Claudia Sahm, who believed that when the unemployment rate rises 50 basis points from its low of the past year a recession is almost always underway. That has now happened.

 

The debt market took note by driving the yield on the benchmark 10-year, U.S. Treasury bond below 4 percent first the first time since February. Traders are not only convinced that the Fed will need to cut interest rates soon but are also worried that when they do, it will be too little, too late to stave off a recession. That triggered a rush for safety. Between the drop in yields and the poor manufacturing data, the stock market swooned giving back all of the gains for the week and then some.

 

If you recall my writing a month or so ago, I acknowledged at the time that everything was coming up roses as far as the economic environment was concerned. Nonetheless, my Spidey sense told me to be cautious in July and expect a sell-off. I have found that intuition is sometimes as valuable as a spreadsheet full of data in this business.

 

As for this weeks' recession scare, I come down on the side that one or two data points stacked up against a lot of numbers indicating continued growth in the economy fails to convince me we are heading for a hard landing. But if one needed a trigger to take profits, a recession scare is a good excuse.

 

In any case, the volatility in July has now rolled over into August. This week, stocks have gyrated in both directions, gaining and losing more than 1-2 percent a day in all three averages as well as in the small-cap arena. It is the kind of action one normally sees at the bottom and top of markets and indicates a change in the trend.

 

The S&P 500 Index racked up a 5 percent loss, while the NASDAQ lost double that in July. So far this month, which is usually a bad month for the markets anyway (as is September), we are extending those losses.

 

Last week, I wrote that the pullback was not yet over, but I did expect a bounce, and we got that last week. I believe there may be a bit more downside ahead with a total decline of as much as 7 percent from the high on the S&P 500. We may see that by the end of this week, and I may be conservative. A full 10 percent correction would not surprise me either.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

July, as promised, has turned out to be a month where financial markets have been buffeted by fireworks on various fronts. A gambit of data from inflation to economic growth combined with a new American brand of populism has led to some unexpected market consequences.

 

The good news first. In the second quarter, gross domestic product grew well above economists' expectations at an annualized pace of 2.8 percent, compared to forecasts of 2 percent growth. The "core" Personal Consumption Expenditures Index (PCE), which excludes food and energy, grew by 2.9 percent in the second quarter. That was above estimates of 2.7 percent but significantly lower than the 3.7 percent gain in the prior quarter.

 

On Friday, the monthly PCE data came in as expected edging up 0.1 percent month-over-month in June following a flat reading in May. However, the core index was a bit higher than forecasts at 0.2 percent versus expectations of a 0.1 percent increase. While still an increase, it is the slowest pace of inflation since March 2021. It is doubtful that the data will convince the Fed to change monetary policy sooner than the market expects.

 

On the political front, my prediction that President Biden might relinquish his candidacy in favor of his vice president, Kamala Harris, proved to be true. The impact on the financial markets has been negligible thus far, but the odds of a Trump win have gone down somewhat. As a result, the fervor to buy areas of the market that might benefit from a Republican sweep has subsided a little.

 

I believe that to make investment decisions at this point on who will win or lose the elections is largely fools' gold. Far better that we focus instead on something more tangible like the expectations that the Federal Reserve Bank will likely begin to cut interest rates at their next meeting in September.

 

We will know more about this in the coming week when the FOMC meets again on July 30. While there is only a 6 percent chance that the Fed will cut interest rates at this month's meeting, the odds are almost 100 percent that they will cut interest rates in September. That bet is what has investors buying small-cap stocks, which benefit the most from the loosening of monetary policy.

 

In the meantime, stocks have done what I predicted. The S&P 500 Index declined by 5 percent or so with NASDAQ falling almost double that amount. However, the Great Rotation that I discussed in my last column is alive and well.

 

The Russell 2000 small-cap index outperformed as did other forgotten areas like financials, real estate, and industrials. On the downside, the darlings of the market over the past months, FANG and AI companies were clobbered as did the technology sector overall.

 

You might think that if some sectors were up, while others were down, the overall market would balance out. Not so. Market capitalization is the key. Over the years, the growing weight of this handful of tech stocks in just about all of U.S. equity indexes has been extreme. The entire market cap of the Russell 2000 Index, for example, is equal to the market cap of just one of the FANG stocks. As such, no matter how much small caps gain, they can never make up for the declines in the technology sector.

 

In the short term, where FANG and AI technology go, so goes the markets. On the surface, the carnage in some stocks was nasty, but in the grand scheme of things a mere bump in the road considering the gains we have enjoyed thus far in the stock market this year.

 

The question you may be asking is whether the selloff is over. I sense that we still have more to go, but we could bounce first before rolling over again. This volatility could last until the Fed meeting late next week. At that point, with possibly more visibility on rate cuts, the market could find support.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

As temperatures climb to record highs throughout the nation, the financial markets feel their brand of heat as election fever takes hold with a vengeance.

 

Suddenly, value stocks, which have taken a back seat to the FANG/AI equity gang for months, are coming back into vogue. Semiconductor stocks, which have led the tech market higher for years had their deepest sell-off since 2022. Even Nvidia is suffering a bout of profit-taking.

 

Some are calling it the 'Great Rotation' where traders are taking profits on the concentration trade consisting of a handful of large-cap mega stocks and diving into financials, industrials, materials, and even regional banks. But the prize for the greatest bounce off the bottom had to be the market's unwanted stepchild, the Russell 2000. This small-cap index logged a 12 percent gain in just five days before profit-taking set in.

 

To be fair, some of this rotation has more to do with the expectation that the Federal Reserve Bank will cut interest rates in September. The odds of that occurring among Wall Street bond players are now just short of 100 percent. As such, it is an accepted principle that small-cap stocks benefit the most from lowering interest rates. That is because many of these companies do not make money and must borrow to stay afloat. Lower interest rates also help commodities, especially precious metals, which explains why gold hit an all-time high this week before profit-taking.

 

However, the decline in overseas markets, in China plays, in semiconductor and tech stocks, while gains in cyclical areas, financials, and others can be attributed to the political arena rather than any macroeconomic data or what the Fed said or didn't say. Back in June, I wrote, "We are entering the season where election politics begin to matter to the stock market. It may be that political uncertainty may begin to trump economics." That season is clearly upon us.

 

In quick succession the markets have witnessed the Biden debate debacle, the Supreme Court immunity ruling, Democrat demands that President Biden drop out of the race, the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, and the selection of J.D. Vance as Trump's running mate, former President Trump's nomination at the Republican National Convention, and the release of a Bloomberg interview with Trump that underscored his intent to place 100 percent tariffs on Chinese goods and a warning to Fed President Jerome Powell not to cut interest rates before the election.

 

And if that wasn't enough to keep the algos and computer programmers busy devising new algorithms for their day trading, rumor has it that the effort by Democrats to replace Joe Biden as their candidate may be gathering strength again now that President Biden has come down with COVID. Many on Wall Street believe we could see an announcement of a Biden drop-out in favor of Kamala Harris this weekend.

 

The implications of a Trump versus Biden (or Harris) presidency appear to be monumental on the surface if you listen to the candidates. Regulations might change, which could be good or bad depending on what sectors are impacted. I expect the media, who are in the business of selling more newspapers and as many clicks as possible, will embellish every campaign promise, and every policy suggestion with a whole series of "what-ifs." They need to do that to keep you reading and listening. As for the polls, forget them. The polls are notoriously inaccurate and are simply another method politicians are using to advance their numbers.

 

If you have not done so, I urge you to read my series of columns on regime change and this era of populism that we are now entering in full force. I believe it will help put all the political events of the last few weeks into perspective. It will also give you some guidance on what to expect going forward in the financial markets.

 

The present environment will only become more heated and volatile into November. As such, I must remind readers that campaign promises are not facts. Nor is hope, like despair, an investment strategy. After managing money through a good number of presidential elections, I can state categorically that buying or selling investments based on who wins or loses elections in the U.S. is a bad, bad idea. To do so only guarantees one loser — you.

 

As for the markets, over the last few weeks, my advice was to expect a selloff in the stock market in mid-July. The only question to ask at this point is how deep of a correction are we in for. It doesn't have to be a straight-down plunge. We could bounce and then roll over, bounce again and so on until we see an overall decline of 5 percent-6 percent plus. It could be more, but we will need to wait and see.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

The Consumer Price Index was cooler than expected in June, while the Producer Price Index was warmer. Equity traders responded by selling winners and buying losers.

 

CPI inflation fell further than most expected as easing prices for gasoline and other staples like food and new lease rents cooled dramatically. That information might help the level of anxiety people are feeling about inflation. It appears that the price points of most staples have finally flattened out year-over-year instead of constantly going up as they have for the last few years. 

 

Countering that good news, wholesale prices climbed 0.2 percent last month led by prices for services, which offset a decline in goods prices. The May PPI numbers were also revised upwards as well. However, the CPI news trumped the disappointing PPI data on the nation's trading desks.

 

Fed Chairman Jerome Powell's testimony before Congress this week paved the way for the inflation data. On Wednesday, in his testimony before the Senate Banking Committee, he said, "More good data would strengthen our confidence that inflation is moving sustainably toward 2 percent."

 

His semiannual congressional appearance at the House Financial Services Committee a day later was also encouraging. Powell hinted that the environment for rate cuts is approaching citing a jobs market that is slowing down. He also said that the Fed had been heavily focused on inflation but is now getting to a place where the labor market is drawing more of their attention.

 

Recently, the labor market data indicated that the number of jobs is declining. Powell clarified that he and his committee are increasingly aware of the risks posed by a cooling labor market. His comments kept the equity market well-bid for most of the week and the inflation data announcements were simply the cherry on the bull's cake.

 

Based on Powell's testimony and the cooler CPI data, the betting for a rate cut by September skyrocketed to more than 90 percent. Both the U.S. dollar and bond yields plummeted as a result. However, at the same time, a massive shift occurred as momentum and program traders sold down the ten or so large-cap stocks that have driven the averages higher, while buying hand-over-fist areas like precious metals, China, emerging markets, small-cap stocks, industrials, and real estate.

 

All the above areas benefit the most from a declining dollar, lower interest rates, or both. This could be good news for the health of the market if this trend were to continue. I have written about the concentration risk (too few stocks going up) that has gripped the market over the last few months. For the markets to continue to gain, we need to see a broadening out of stocks that are participating in the upturn.

 

If the market were to rotate out of some of its FANG/AI holdings into other equity and commodity areas, there likely would be a period of consolidation and volatility in the markets. I have been expecting higher highs into mid to late July followed by a period of consolidation. As of right now, I am on target and await further developments.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.