Letter: Save Notch Forest

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

I am writing to express deep concern over the proposed logging project near Notch Reservoir and the Bellows Pipe Trailhead. This plan poses a significant threat to both the environment and our community's well-being.

Notch Road has already seen the effects of large logging projects. A private logging project from a few years ago (approved by the City) causes flooding during heavy rains, pouring into driveways and basements. Our area regularly faces power outages and property damage due to increasing wind gusts. Without the forests as a buffer, I fear these issues will worsen.

While the city proposes installing culverts as part of the "reconstruction" of the forest. With wetter seasons due to climate change, how will they address future challenges? How many culverts are planned, and how is their effectiveness measured? How will the city manage the wind? Are they prepared for more power outages? Will road and electricity maintenance end up costing the city more?

 As a resident of Notch Road, I'm also worried about noise, air pollution, and increased traffic from logging trucks. The constant noise will disrupt the peaceful environment and harm local wildlife. Animals that depend on these forests for food and shelter will be displaced, pushing them into our backyards and upsetting the balance of our ecosystem. The forest is their home.

Lastly, there were misleading statements at last week's town meeting. Mass Audubon's Andrew Randazzo claimed that younger trees sequester more carbon. This idea is based on comparisons between old tropical forests and young temperate or boreal forests, which are very different. Temperate forests, in fact, have some of the highest CO2 removal rates. The idea that young trees growing rapidly sequester more carbon does not account for the 100-plus years of carbon already stored in a mature tree. Cutting down the tree releases that carbon that then has to be sequestered again. Many studies show that old-growth forests sequester more carbon over their lifetimes.



The Adirondack Council's Robert T. Leverett, chair of the Forest Reserves Science Advisory Committee, noted that "[d]uring this crucial period of getting our carbon emissions under control, the public forests should basically be left alone to accumulate carbon as rapidly as possible. Where management in public forests is continued, the priority should be to increase the rate of carbon storage beyond what would happen through natural processes. There are management strategies to increase sequestration in forests, but they do not include removing the star performers, the big trees."

I find it shameful that experts, not tied to logging companies, have not been consulted. North Adams deserves more than to be considered an "experiment." We should respect ourselves enough to remember that.

For the sake of our future, let's reject this plan and work toward solutions that preserve our forests, environment, and quality of life.

A presentation will be held on Sept. 27 at Terra Nova Church in North Adams at 7 p.m. to address these concerns and more. See you there. 

Devin Raber
North Adams, Mass. 

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Save Brayton: Vote No on Oct. 8

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:
 

The city of North Adams wants to use state money to demolish and rebuild Greylock School, all because it has neglected to maintain the resources it already has.
 
A vote for a $65 million school is a vote for higher rent, groceries, and taxes — all for a district with a declining school-age population. The $65 million budget for the demolition and reconstruction of the Greylock School is just an initial estimate. While the opposing side notes that the state is paying for $45 million of the project, taxpayers will pay for cost overruns. 
 
North Adams has not had a single public building project on budget in the past 20 years. Even if a Ferrari is offered at 65 percent off, that doesn't mean it's not going to feel like a big expense — and let's not forget about vehicle excise taxes.
 
The opposition also claims that Brayton's repair costs will fall on taxpayers more than if the city demolishes Greylock and builds a new school. The only repair quote for Brayton came from the consultants who have an incentive to sell to us the much larger $65 million school project — a huge conflict of interest. The biggest profiteers from this new school will not be our city's future students — it will be building companies, consultants, and debt servicers from outside the Berkshires.
 
There are other ways to pay for much-needed renovations. The city has not investigated other state programs for repairing our existing schools, like the Massachusetts School Building Authority's Accelerated Repair Program. Further, when compared with renovating and repairing buildings that already exist, new construction increases greenhouse gas emissions by more than 50 percent, according to the World Economic Forum.
 
North Adams' population is declining so quickly that even Superintendent Barbara Malkas noted in a 2021 iBerkshires article that our school district "does not [even] need to operate with three schools." This year's Greylock School closure reinforces this. Why build a K–2 school for (remember, at least) $65 million in a city with a declining population?
 
With no plans for Brayton after Greylock's demolition, Brayton will likely become another Sullivan School — sitting vacant, wasting taxpayers' dollars. A vote no on Oct. 8 is a vote to save Brayton and all the resources we already have. In a city like ours with a significant low-income population, it's access to necessities like food, compassionate teachers, and a quality home life that translates to successful student outcomes — not a shiny building

Diane Morrissey
North Adams, Mass. 

 

 

View Full Story

More North Adams Stories