Williams College Activists 'Disappointed' in Decision not to Divest

iBerkshires.com StaffPrint Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN. Mass. – Williams College students pressuring the school to divest from companies that sell weapons to the Israeli Defense Forces say they will continue those calls in the wake of a June vote by the school’s trustees.
 
“We want to express that we are deeply disappointed in President [Maud] Mandel and the Board of Trustees over this decision, but we are not surprised by the college’s continued tendency towards inaction,” a member of the college’s chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine wrote in an email this week.
 
The student group was responding to a 1,200-word open letter from Mandel and the chair of Williams’ Board of Trustees that the college posted on Tuesday.
 
In it, the college president said the board voted to follow the recommendations of the college’s Advisory Committee on Shareholder Responsibility and not divest from the weapons manufacturers.
 
Two student groups, Students for Justice in Palestine and Jews for Justice, had asked the college to take the step in the wake of Israel’s months-long military campaign in Gaza following the October 2023 attack on Israel by the militant Hamas group.
 
The college president and board cited several reasons not to divest or to adopt a new strategy for the college’s investments based on “environmental, social and governance” or ESG principles, as the student groups recommended.
 
The school’s administration did agree it should be more transparent about its investment strategies and would work in that area starting this summer.
 
But divestment would run contrary to the purpose of those investments, according to the letter.
 
“The Board does not believe that the endowment should be used to advocate positions on world affairs,” Mandel and Board Chair Liz Robinson wrote. “And because our investment strategy consists solely of investing through third-party investment managers and funds, what might otherwise seem to be small, exclusionary changes in the composition of our investments would actually compromise our access to key investment managers, undermining the Board’s fiduciary obligation to manage the endowment in ways that fully fund the college.”
 
The letter called divestment, an action pushed on college campuses nationwide, a “symbolic gesture,” and repeatedly pointed to the benefit of strong returns on the college’s endowment.
 
“Subordinating overall investment strategy, in which performance and impact are assessed over many decades, to the volatility of geopolitical events and shifting ESG assessments would introduce significant new risk,” Mandel’s and Robinson’s letter reads. “The Board is unwilling to accept increased risk, given that we rely on the endowment to provide 55 percent of our annual operating budget, including funding for academic and co-curricular programs, faculty and staff salaries and benefits, facilities and financial aid offerings.
 
“By investing alumni donations into global markets in ways that magnify their power, we create educational opportunities beyond what many students and their families could afford otherwise, and beyond what almost any other school can offer.”
 
The letter from the college said that the Board of Trustees made its decision after consulting the school’s Advisory Committee on Shareholder Responsibility and Investment Committee as well as members of Jews for Justice and Students for Justice in Palestine, who organized an encampment in the heart of campus in May.
 
On Wednesday, the student groups said they will continue to have conversations with the administration and promised a full statement on the group’s social media account.
 
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories