Hancock Town Meeting Votes to Strike Meme Some Found 'Divisive'

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Hancock town meeting members Monday vote on a routine item early in the meeting.
HANCOCK, Mass. — By the narrowest of margins Monday, the annual town meeting voted to strike from the town report messaging that some residents described as, "inflammatory," "divisive" and unwelcoming to new residents.
 
On a vote of 50-48, the meeting voted to remove the inside cover of the report as it appeared on the town website and in printed versions distributed prior to the meeting and at the elementary school on Monday night.
 
The text, which appeared to be a reprinted version of an Internet meme, read, "You came here from there because you didn't like it there, and now you want to change here to be like there. You are welcome here, only don't try to make here like there. If you want to make here like there, you shouldn't have left there in the first place."
 
After the meeting breezed through the first 18 articles on the town meeting warrant agenda with hardly a dissenting vote, a member rose to ask if it would be unreasonable for the meeting to vote to remove the meme under Article 19, the "other business" article.
 
"No, you cannot remove it," Board of Selectmen Chair Sherman Derby answered immediately.
 
After it became clear that Moderator Brian Fairbank would entertain discussion about the meme, Derby took the floor to address the issue that has been discussed in town circles since the report was printed earlier this spring.
 
"Let me tell you about something that happened this year," Derby said. "The School Department got rid of Christmas. And they got rid of Columbus Day. Now it's Indigenous People's Day.
 
"And they tried to get rid of the Community Christmas.
 
"[The meme] isn't directed at any specific person. If the shoe fits, wear it."
 
Hancock's Community Christmas, a town celebration held at the elementary school, is funded, in part, by an allocation of town funds. Monday's meeting approved a $500 allotment for the December event on Monday as part of Article 10 on the warrant.
 
Resident Bruce Weiner rose on the floor of the meeting to respond to Derby's statement.
 
"I recommended to the School Committee that they call their event a Holiday Concert," Weiner said. "It's a very personal thing for me. I'm Jewish."
 
Weiner said his own children who went through Hancock Elementary School were uncomfortable participating in a school Christmas concert and that a holiday event would be more inclusive.
 
"It's the same with Columbus Day," Weiner said. "There are folks who don't feel comfortable with Columbus Day, like Native Americans. We want to be more inclusive."
 
Derby told the meeting that members of the three-person Board of Selectmen attended the School Committee meeting where the holiday names were discussed and told the School Committee that it could not change the name "Community Christmas" because it was a town event, not a school event.
 
School Committee Chair Alex Kastrinakas took the floor to tell the meeting that, in fact, it was the School Committee itself that made the point at its meeting that it had no authority over Community Christmas and changing its name was never a consideration.
 
Mustafa Deen moved to strike the "you shouldn't have left there" meme from the town report, saying at one point that it was "offensive to so many people unnecessarily."
 
Another member speaking in support of the motion said those who defend the meme might feel differently some day if a different Board of Selectmen inserted political statements they do not agree with into the town report.
 
A couple of residents spoke in opposition to the motion, one indicating that it would be "facist" for the meeting to squelch the First Amendment rights of the Board of Selectmen to include any language they want in the town report.
 
Town Clerk Linda Burdick, who said she moved to Hancock "from there" for its "caring people" and low taxes, pointed out that there was nothing illegal about including the meme in the report.
 
"Just because you can do it, doesn't mean you should," another resident retorted from the floor.
 
In response to a question from the floor, the Board of Selectmen, seated on the stage at the front of the auditorium, confirmed that the entire body had approved the contents of the town report, including the meme.
 
Don Leab asked from the floor whether a motion to amend the town report as suggested was legal because it was not specifically called out in the meeting warrant. Fairbank said that, in his opinion, the issue was a valid question for the meeting.
 
About 15 minutes into the meeting, Selectman Don Rancatti interrupted a speaker in support of the motion to ask Fairbank to call the question. And Fairbank called for a vote to close debate, which passed overwhelmingly.
 
It took two rounds of votes by a show of hands to verify the vote totals, but, in the end, Burdick confirmed a 50-48 vote in favor of removing the meme.
 
The meeting was attended by 115 of 572 registered voters in the town, about 20 percent.
 
After the decision was made, Burdick said in answer to questions from members that the meme would be removed from the PDF version of the report on the town's website and pulled from the official copy that is sent to the State Library in Boston.
 
The only other article on the warrant to generate significant discussion on Monday was Article 18, a home rule petition to exempt Hancock from a state law forcing districts, like Hancock, without a secondary school to be financially responsible for the middle and high school education of pupils who attend the district's elementary school under the state's School Choice program.
 
Hancock Superintendent Rebecca Phillips explained the issue to the meeting and said there are encouraging signs that the petition could succeed on Beacon Hill.
 
"We have a lot of support from our legislators but, also, the Department of Education is comfortable with this exemption," Phillips told the meeting.

Tags: town meeting 2024,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories