Letter: Letter to Williamstown Board of Selectmen

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

To the members of the Williamstown Board of Selectmen:

First of all, let us say thank you for your commitment to this community. Williamstown is a well-run town, and you should be proud of your contribution.

That being said, we are distressed to hear that you are planning to make a statement on behalf of the community regarding the Hamas/Israel war. In our opinion, this goes far beyond your mandate as selectpersons. You were elected because of your perceived qualifications to run the affairs of this small town.

You were not elected to pretend to represent the opinion of us or any other member of this community concerning international affairs, and it would be presumptuous on your part to do so. Williamstown is not a monolithic community. Opinions about this war differ widely depending on background, heritage, family history, knowledge of the facts and other factors.

For the town to take an official position on this conflict, no matter which side, will only serve to divide the community. Moreover, it would only be a "feel-good" action and do nothing to truly further world peace. Peace begins right here at home, with respect for the sensibilities of the entire community, and that is our responsibility.

If the members of the board want to make a difference, then they, like everyone else, can bombard their national representatives — those who can really make a difference — with messages stating their views, and if they are not happy with those representatives, they can vote them out. The threat of being voted out of office is a large-sized prod for any elected official.

In reading reports of the Select Board meetings, we can see how this issue already divides the town. Please do not be bullied into making statements on behalf of Williamstown concerning this or any other geo-political issue that clearly lies outside of your mandate as selectmen.

Respectfully yours,

Barbara Gallo, Gay Scarborough, Jane Peth, Jean Queen
Williamstown, Mass. 

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Fire District Developing Policy on Members Who Hit Retirement Age

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Prudential Committee on Wednesday discussed the need for a policy for all call-volunteer firefighters who reach the state's mandatory retirement age.
 
And the panel talked about how the Fire Department can continue to utilize the experience of members who have reached the age of 65.
 
The state's retirement age first came up in the context of Chief Craig Pedercini, who had asked the Prudential Committee to start the process of a home-rule petition to the Legislature to receive an exemption for the district when he has his 65th birthday next year.
 
The committee declined to take that route and instead is in the opening stages of a search process for the department's next chief, a task being coordinated by the Prudential Committee's Personnel subcommittee.
 
That subcommittee also has been asked to draft a policy for the department that reflects the state retirement age.
 
Prudential Committee member Joe Beverly, who serves on the subcommittee, told his colleagues that the panel had lengthy conversations on what to do about firefighters who reach age 65.
 
"A lot of [subcommittee] members felt it was beneficial to have members in other roles within the fire district [after 65]," Beverly said.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories