Man Found Guilty of Illegal Possession of a Firearm in Pittsfield

Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — On Friday, March 15, William Hennessey, 31 of West Springfield, was found guilty by a jury of his peers of illegal possession of a firearm. 
 
The jury found the Defendant not guilty of assault with a dangerous weapon. The trial took place in Berkshire Superior Court.
 
According to a report, On May 7, 2020, an incident of road rage took place between a truck and minivan in Pittsfield. The Defendant was a passenger in the minivan which included four adults and two children. The truck driver allegedly forced the van to the side of the road. The truck driver then exited his vehicle and began screaming at the minivan driver. After screaming at the van, the truck driver returned to his car and left the scene.  The minivan driver reported the incident to Pittsfield police. 
 
At approximately 10pm on the same day, the driver of the minivan, along with the Defendant who was still in the van, spotted the same truck parked in a convenience store lot. The driver of the van attempted to block the truck to get a picture of the license place. The truck was able to get by the van. The truck driver then immediately put the truck in reverse and rammed into the van. He then attempted to do this a second time. At this point, Hennessey exited the van and shot at the truck. A bullet shattered the back window; however, the driver of the truck was unharmed. The Defendant then abandoned his gun and fled. Pittsfield Police recovered the gun the following day.
 
 Upon the guilty verdict, Hennessey's bail was revoked. He will be sentenced in Berkshire Superior Court on Thursday, March 21 at 2pm.
 
Assistant District Attorney Joseph Yorlano represented the Commonwealth. Tara Jones-Nutting served as the victim witness advocate on behalf of the Berkshire District Attorney's Office. Pittsfield Police acted as the lead law enforcement agency.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Adopts Surveillance Tech Oversight Ordinance

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— After two years of preparation, the City Council has adopted a surveillance technology ordinance regarding police body cameras and other equipment.

On Tuesday, a petition from Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren amending the City Code by adding Chapter 18 ½, Surveillance Technology Oversight, was approved.  Warren has championed this effort since 2022— before a five-year contract with body and dash cams was approved.

The ordinance will take effect 180 days after its adoption.

It is based on the Town of Amherst's modified version of the City of Cambridge Ordinance that uses an American Civil Liberties Union model for community control surveillance technology.

"This has been an issue that lots of communities have been looking at, both in Massachusetts and outside of Massachusetts, dealing with software that has some surveillance capability that could possibly have some negative impact on our citizens," Warren said.

The purpose of the ordinance is to provide regulations for surveillance technology acquisition, use by the city, or the use of the surveillance data it provides to safeguard the right of individuals' privacy balanced with the need to promote and provide safety and security.  

It aims to avoid marginalized communities being disproportionately affected by the use of this technology.  Warren would not be surprised if this were encompassed in a statue for statewide standards.

"Police body cameras have the potential to serve as a much-needed police oversight tool at a time of a growing recognition that the United States has a real problem with police violence. But if the technology is to be effective at providing oversight, reducing police abuses, and increasing community trust, it is vital that they be deployed with good policies to ensure they accomplish those goals," the ACLU explains on its website.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories