image description
Roots Rising is giving up on a farm at Springside Park because of arsenic-infected soils and invasive plants that would require years of preparation and maintenance.

Springside Park Not Viable for Roots Rising Farm

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Arsenic-infected soils and invasive plants have led Roots Rising to pull its farm project from Springside Park.

"Over the past several months we have been studying the site at Springside Park. We found levels of arsenic that require further investigation as well as a number of species of invasive plants," Executive Director Jess Vecchia wrote to the Parks Commission.

"One such plant, cypress spurge, is of particular concern because contact with the latex sap can cause serious burns on skin, as well as permanent corneal damage if it comes into contact with the eyes."

Earlier this year, the nonprofit farming organization came to the commission with plans for its Youth Farm that is an intersection of the organization's youth empowerment and food justice work.

Included in the roughly four-acre plans next to the Chestnut Seed Orchard were a tool shed, farm office, curing and drying shed, a wash and pack station, an open-air pavilion, and the build-out of a hoop house and prop house.

Roots Rising hired Regenerative Design Group to help create a report that outlines the methods for cypress spurge suppression, potential methods of cultivation, and future invasive control.


"While farming is certainly possible at Springside Park, we do not believe the park is a viable location for our Youth Farm," Vecchia wrote.

On Tuesday, commissioners said it was "unfortunate" that the site is not fit.  

The organization would need to spend up to three years tiling the soil every three weeks to get it ready for use, which would require special equipment and staff time. Planning could not begin until the fourth year and invasive control would need to be part of the farm management plan in perpetuity.  

There would even still be a high potential for exposure or injury from the cypress spurge to anyone who puts their hands in the soil.

"While this is disappointing news, a diligent land assessment ensures the greatest potential for success of our farm project," Vecchia wrote.

The organization has been looking for a place to call home for a couple of years and will continue conversations with city staff and private landowners to find an alternate site and the commission was thanked for its support.


Tags: agriculture,   Springside Park,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories