Little New Growth Leads to Tough Budget Choices in Williamstown

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Rising costs plus flat revenues add up to a tricky budget season for Williamstown Town Manager Robert Menicocci this winter.
 
"Out of the gates, we have a match problem," Menicocci told the Select Board at its Nov. 13 meeting.
 
"Property taxes always have the 2.5 percent levy limit on them from Proposition 2 1/2. And unless you have significant property growth in terms of coming on the [tax] rolls, like we did with Cable Mills last year, that's our only source of additional growth to help fund either new requests or fund gaps like we have now with what we're facing with inflation."
 
Against that potential 2.5 percent increase in the levy on existing property value is a 3 percent salary increase for town employees and inflation running around 4 percent "maybe slightly higher," Menicocci said.
 
And all of these budget constraints happen against the backdrop of a looming capital expense for property taxpayers in the town.
 
"We know we're going to have a little bit of a taxation shock when the Fire District liability comes online through the borrowing for the new firehouse," Menicocci said. "With that in mind, we want to be very mindful of what we can do this year to keep costs very contained, keep the budget very contained."
 
In answer to a question from the board, Menicocci said he did not believe that the fire station borrowing would hit local taxpayers until after fiscal year 2025, the budget he currently is developing.
 
Board member Stephanie Boyd said the Prudential Committee, which governs the Fire District, plans to use a $5 million gift from Williams College toward the new Main Street station before raising money for the bond through taxation.
 
In February, a special meeting of the Fire District overwhelmingly approved borrowing up to $22.5 million for the new station; district officials plan to use the $5 million from the college to reduce the overall amount that needs to be borrowed.
 
In terms of the town budget for FY25, Menicocci expects a negligible increase in the tax base.
 
For FY24, the current fiscal year that ends next June 30, the town budgeted $650,000 in revenue from "new growth," including, as Menicocci mentioned, the Cable Mills housing development on Water Street.
 
"If we get $50,000 or $60,000 in additional revenues in growth this year, that would be a pretty good situation," he said last week. "There's not a lot of buffer to absorb the financial impacts we're going to see strictly from inflation.
 
"In terms of growth, new properties coming online to add to our property tax base, it looks to be very limited this year. There's a lot of activity in the community in terms of projects and things of that nature, but a lot of that is on the more modest side — a bathroom renovation, a kitchen renovation, things like that, which don't really affect your tax rolls as much as a new development would or a significant addition on a home."
 
Menicocci said he currently is in conversation with the town's department heads about their budgetary needs for FY25, but he is operating on the premise that the coming spending plan will be a "maintenance budget."
 
His comments came shortly after a previously scheduled board discussion of the individual members' requests for items that could be included in the FY25 budget.
 
Randal Fippinger, who occupies the Select Board's seat on the Diversity, Inclusion and Racial Equity Advisory Committee, said that body would like to have its own line item in the town budget. The FY24 budget includes a $1,500 line item for "DIRE programs."
 
It was agreed that Fippinger and/or DIRE Committee Chair Shana Dixon should meet with Menicocci to talk about what level of funding might be reasonable in next year's budget.
 
Andrew Hogeland said that when thinking about new spending priorities, he started by going through the action items that came out of the Williamstown CARES study, the new comprehensive plan and the town's grassroots climate action group, the COOL (Carbon Dioxide Lowering) Committee.
 
"It's 150 things in a two-month period — all legitimate concerns, valid ideas, thoughtful people," Hogeland said. "No shade on anything, but it's a lot of them."
 
He said he narrowed down the list of items to two the he would like to see addressed in the FY25 budget: improving town communications, including a revamp of the town's website, and an assessment of townwide infrastructure, "with an eye specifically toward looking at energy conservation matters."
 
Stephanie Boyd agreed with Hogeland's suggestions and noted that the ad hoc Debt Study Committee also has highlighted the need for a town-wide capital plan.
 
Boyd also said her list of budget priorities. She and Jeffrey Johnson talked about a need for the town to financially support "townwide celebrations." Johnson specifically recalled last summer's Select Board conversation about using taxpayer funds to help pay for July Fourth fireworks.
 
"Maybe it's fireworks one year and something else another year," Boyd said. "If we set aside some money for town celebrations, be it Pride Day or July 4 or Juneteenth — I'd love to hear from our community what kinds of activities they would like to support. But I definitely think that's a role for our town."
 
Fippinger said the idea of municipal celebrations dovetails with the CARES report's recommendations on community building.
 
Menicocci indicated that some of the board's priorities already were on his radar.
 
"There's no lack of need," he said. "We know we have a lot of infrastructure things we want to keep pace with. At the same time, we know we have gaps in the things that we need to deliver. We talk about communications and things like that — those are resource heavy things to do, to communicate well and do that on a daily basis really takes dedicated focus and personnel to do a lot of that work. We have to balance some of that out.
 
"We definitely have needs, not necessarily the money to do that. And that's why we'll step out of the gates with a maintenance budget from our department heads, see where that takes us and then start the work on whether we can maintain or whether we have to actually cut back a little bit."

Tags: fiscal 2025,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories