Dalton Zoning Board Approves Fence Variance

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Zoning Board of Appeals approved a variance to install a fence 26 feet off the center of the road at the residence located at 112 Kimberly Drive. 
 
The board said it approved this variance because the property's topography and shape makes it difficult to adhere to the town's bylaw. 
 
The bylaw requires that fences be installed 50 feet in from the center of the road and requires a 4-foot fence.
 
The installation of a 6-foot colonial style fence is an the effort to improve security, obtain more privacy, and lessen visibility of a lot that has become overgrown, Eric Pratt said. 
 
The fence will connect to the house to make the property safer for his children, he said. 
 
The installation of the fence will not affect drivers' visibility when turning onto Barton Hill Road from Kimberly Drive because it is 100 feet from the corner. 
 
Putting a fence 50 feet in from the center of the street makes the 6-foot fence meaningless from a privacy standpoint, Pratt said during the last meeting. 
 
In an email interaction between himself and Building Commissioner and Zoning Enforcement Officer Brian Duval, Pratt said planting trees closer to the street would block even more visibility than the 6-foot fence. 
 
Due to the "drastic slope" from the road the installation of the 6-foot fence would "be more like a 4-foot fence from the street level," he said during the previous meeting. 
 
During deliberations board members noted that if Pratt installed the fence in accordance with the bylaw it would be very close to the swing set on the side of the house. 
 
Zoning Board Chairman Anthony Doyle had member Caleb Darby run the public hearing to avoid a conflict of interest. Doyle is one of Pratt's neighbors. Doyle also abstained from the vote. 

Tags: ZBA,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Adopts Surveillance Tech Oversight Ordinance

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— After two years of preparation, the City Council has adopted a surveillance technology ordinance regarding police body cameras and other equipment.

On Tuesday, a petition from Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren amending the City Code by adding Chapter 18 ½, Surveillance Technology Oversight, was approved.  Warren has championed this effort since 2022— before a five-year contract with body and dash cams was approved.

The ordinance will take effect 180 days after its adoption.

It is based on the Town of Amherst's modified version of the City of Cambridge Ordinance that uses an American Civil Liberties Union model for community control surveillance technology.

"This has been an issue that lots of communities have been looking at, both in Massachusetts and outside of Massachusetts, dealing with software that has some surveillance capability that could possibly have some negative impact on our citizens," Warren said.

The purpose of the ordinance is to provide regulations for surveillance technology acquisition, use by the city, or the use of the surveillance data it provides to safeguard the right of individuals' privacy balanced with the need to promote and provide safety and security.  

It aims to avoid marginalized communities being disproportionately affected by the use of this technology.  Warren would not be surprised if this were encompassed in a statue for statewide standards.

"Police body cameras have the potential to serve as a much-needed police oversight tool at a time of a growing recognition that the United States has a real problem with police violence. But if the technology is to be effective at providing oversight, reducing police abuses, and increasing community trust, it is vital that they be deployed with good policies to ensure they accomplish those goals," the ACLU explains on its website.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories