image description
Parks Manager James McGrath explains how a 'low tech' boat wash would operate at Onota Lake to prevent zebra mussel contamination.

Lower Tech Onota Lake Boat Wash Proposal Seeks CPA Funds

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Plans for an Onota Lake boat wash station were made lower-tech after the original proposal became too expensive. This iteration cuts costs while warding off zebra mussels. 

The new design includes on-site water storage — rather than sewage and plumbing — and is priced at around $75,000. 
 
Park, Open Space, and Natural Resource Program Manager James McGrath explained the revision to the Parks Commission on Tuesday while presenting Pittsfield's fiscal 2023 Community Preservation Act applications. 
 
In collaboration with the Lake Onota Preservation Association, the city is requesting $74,500 in CPA funds for a decontamination boat wash station to protect the lake from zebra mussels. The aquatic invasive species was found in Laurel Lake in 2009 and has been established in bordering states. 
 
Once a body of water is infested, there is no current remedy to remove them. High-pressure hot water treatments at a temperature of 140 degrees Fahrenheit or higher are used on boats to prevent contamination. 
 
Originally, the design included a low-impact structure on the northeastern end of the turnaround off Lakeway Drive with the ability to connect to municipal water and sewer.  
 
This was estimated to cost around $250,000. 
 
Because only 10 to 20 boats are turned away by ramp monitors and need decontamination services per year, the planners made cost-saving adjustments that simplify the design while keeping it effective. 
 
"It's a different kind of system, it's not permanently plumbed and sewer," McGrath explained. 
 
"This is one where we bring water in and we fill a water tank because the reality is we're not going to have a lot of boats at this boat wash station." 
 
The new design includes a 500-gallon, above-ground water storage tank and a 1,000-gallon underground waste tank that will be emptied periodically. 
 
Users will pull onto a concrete pad with draining grates to use the diesel-powered hot water system. 
 
The hope is to have the state share some of the operating costs. 
 
McGrath said the infrastructure has a local benefit and a further reaching benefit, as it mitigates the spread of invasive species. 
 
"We've been talking to the state for a number of years about what we're doing to keep Onota Lake free of zebra mussels and this is one more tool in our toolbox," he said. 
 
"So I certainly hope that there's support from the state." 
 
If funding is secured, boaters could see the station implemented as early as the 2024 season. 
 
McGrath said the city's zebra mussel monitoring is largely based on trust, as keeping the lake free of them is in sportsmen and lakeside property owners' best interest. 
 
"It makes sense for us to be looking at this as a preventative option," he said. 
 
The city's other CPA applications for parks include: 
  • $8,000 for tree plantings in Park Square
  • $45,000 to support the replacement of two playground structures and swing frames at Egremont Elementary School. 
  • $24,000 for the restoration of two historic stone piers at the southwest pedestrian entrance at Springside Park near the intersection of North Street and Weller Avenue.

Tags: CPA,   parks commission,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories