Pittsfield Police Union Delays Body Camera Pilot

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Police Department's implementation of a body camera pilot program is being held up by concerns from the union.

On Tuesday, the City Council tabled a status update from the department on body-worn cameras, which have been requested by the council and community members since the police killing of Miguel Estrella in March.

In May, the council formally voted to endorse the use of surveillance technology.

"We're delayed at the moment but we've made quite a bit of progress on the program as a whole," Captain Gary Traversa said.  

He reported that progress had been delayed for the prior 10 days due to issues with the police union but could not disclose any further information.

The panel expects an update on the pilot and a cost estimate for the procurement of body cameras in two weeks.  

"The community has waited a long time for this. We've heard cries for this. The fact that there's a delay, I've got to say, I'm disappointed, " Councilor at Large Earl Persip III said.

"I thought we had all of our ducks in a row trying to do anything we can do to speed this back up. I don't want to delay. I think we should table this and have an update in two weeks. I think the community would want an update in two weeks at our next meeting."

The department met with three vendors, Axon, BodyWorn, and WatchGuard, and dropped WatchGuard from consideration due to a lack of responsiveness and other factors.

After issues with the union are settled, the next step is to deploy the cameras into the field for a six to eight-week period. The department is looking at deploying about 90 cameras and is impressed with aspects of both vendors' technology.

A temporary pilot policy was issued earlier this month.



The hope was to have a vendor chosen by the end of the year.

Traversa described it as a "complex process" with an involved piece of technology that has a lot of features and additional capabilities.

"There are a lot of moving parts and we're trying to work through them one step at a time as best we can,' he added.

Mayor Linda Tyer also could not provide any additional details.

"I think that there were some issues raised this week that the union needs to work through and we won't be able to move forward until those are settled," she said. "I can't speak to it in any greater detail than that."

Persip pressed Tyer for a cost estimate to purchase the cameras but she did not have one. So far, there have been no known conversations with the finance department about it.

Traversa said the department has not "taken much of a dive into the procurement process."

Persip prefers that Tyer asks for the money at the next council meeting to prevent any more delays.


Tags: Pittsfield Police,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories