image description
Voters will decide in December whether to authorize a borrowing to build a new fire station. The current estimate is just under $18 million.
Updated September 30, 2022 08:13AM

Williamstown Fire District Sets Dec. 7 Vote on New Station

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
Updated Friday morning to correct a reference to the vote threshold at the district meeting needed to approve the station.
 
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Five years after the fire district's voters approved purchasing a Main Street parcel for a new station, the Prudential Committee is ready to ask those voters to take the next step.
 
On Wednesday, the committee voted 5-0 to set a special district meeting for Dec. 7 at 7 p.m. when voters will be asked to approve borrowing to pay for construction of a new station.
 
The Prudential Committee accepted the recommendation of its Building Committee that now is the time to finalize the project so that shovels can go in the ground as early as next summer.
 
"I think it's worth repeating every time that it's a complicated project, and there are a lot of difficult decisions to make," the Building Committee's Jim Kolesar told the elected Prudential Committee members. "The later the vote is, the more information you have, the more refined your design and financial projections can be.
 
"The longer you wait, the more expensive the project becomes."
 
Kolesar and Building Committee Chair Elaine Neely told the Prudential Committee that the building panel believes two months is enough time for a vigorous voter information effort in advance of the Dec. 7 meeting, where the question will be decided by a floor vote, where it would require a two-thirds vote for passage.
 
It remains uncertain how much borrowing authority the Prudential Committee will seek from voters.
 
The initial estimate for building a 27,500 square foot station at the former Lehovec property on Main Street (Route 2) came in at just less than $18 million.
 
But the Building Committee hopes to refine that cost in the next few weeks. A big unknown for the architects who did the initial cost projection was the amount of site work that would be needed, and the missing piece of information was a geotechnical survey of the 3.7-acre site.
 
On Wednesday, Ken Romeo of owners' project manager Colliers Engineering and Design told the Prudential Committee that the geotech field work was done, and the consultant should have a report in "two and a half to three weeks" that will help the architects refine their cost estimate.
 
Another unknown is how much money aside from taxation the district can expect.
 
The Prudential Committee is aggressively seeking state and federal grant money to support construction, going so far as to hire a grant writer who, last year, helped the district successfully acquire a $400,000 state grant to pay for design work for the station.
 
And it is widely hoped that Williams College will contribute to the project. The college long has had a payment in lieu of taxes agreement with the district to provide annual support for the Fire Department, and, more recently, provided financial support when the town built a new police station on Simonds Road and gave a $5 million capital gift to Mount Greylock Regional School at the outset of the middle-high school addition/renovation project.
 
Kolesar, an emeritus vice president for public affairs at the college, told the Prudential Committee that Williams' board of trustees are scheduled to meet in October. The next scheduled meeting after that is in January, according to the school's website.
 
As for the voters, who will be asked to bear the bulk of the cost, district officials believe they have a compelling case that the aging, cramped and deficient station on Water Street needs to be replaced.
 
Neely said members of the Building Committee will be going to local civic groups to make the case for a new building, and the district is scheduling open houses at the current facility on Oct. 29 and Nov. 5 to show residents once again how inadequate it is for the district's needs.
 
"I think if you emphasize the health risks involved here, people will understand," Neely said. "As a health professional, I'm horrified by what we're subjecting volunteers to."
 
Officials say a new station would better and more safely serve the district's current staff of call-volunteer firefighters. The chief is the only full-time employee; the rest are compensated by stipend, mostly for hours at an incident.
 
A new station also, it is hoped, will attract new volunteers and, potentially, delay the time when the district might seriously need to look at additional full-time staffing in the face of national declines in volunteerism.
 
"If we're going to have this nice new modern facility, hopefully, it will help us attract volunteers, too," Prudential Committee Chair Dave Moresi said.

Tags: fire station,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories